<![CDATA[North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health]]>Outside of really rich areas like some suburbs around the major cities, I find much of North America's built environment to be almost intolerably bad, visually. It's very ugly. I am thinking of starting a demolition company to bulldoze and blow up and re-design everything.

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/9406/north-america-urban-areas-might-be-too-ugly-for-optimal-healthRSS for NodeTue, 16 Jun 2026 14:51:27 GMTTue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:46 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health on Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:31:55 GMT]]>@Milk-Destroyer xD

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64959https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64959Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:31:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health on Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:02:05 GMT]]>@sunsunsun lol I was just thinking earlier that the title seemed too negative for yourself

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64951https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64951Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:02:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health on Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:21:31 GMT]]>I changed my mind, the premise of this thread is incorrect. It should be titled "North American urban areas are beautiful for optimal health"

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64939https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64939Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:21:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health on Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:15:11 GMT]]>@alfredoolivas oh

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64938https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64938Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:15:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health on Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:34:45 GMT]]>@sunsunsun No one lives in those parts lol...
86b37348-457b-42a9-8eaf-f97755ee38bc-image.jpeg

This is where 80% live.

ee2aa312-de5b-4ba8-90c6-299446ea2133-image.jpeg

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64937https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64937Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:34:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health on Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:49:09 GMT]]>@alfredoolivas mainland England is objectively more beautiful in many areas due to lush greenery lining roads and more antique walls and buildings, as well as narrower roads. I notice Netherlands is also pretty nice too, especially where they grow big trees alongside roads.

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64935https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64935Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:49:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health on Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:24:35 GMT]]>@sunsunsun

True. I think it is due to automobile infrastructure. Not saying everything was beautiful pre-1950s, but much of the historic fabric and architecture was demolished and blown out as if a bomb went off when the Interstate system was implemented.

Buffalo is one of the ugliest cities in the US now, though it still has the fabric and geometry laid out by Olmstead > 100 years ago. DC is beautiful in part because of building height restrictions and road networks inspired by Paris.

Despite extensive railroad and public rail / streetcars of the past, most places are built for the automobile, not for people.

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64931https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64931Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:24:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to North America urban areas might be too ugly for optimal health on Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:34:53 GMT]]>@sunsunsun it's like that everywhere in the world sushi lol

]]>https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64929https://bioenergetic.forum/post/64929Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:34:53 GMT