@CO3
I live in the US and interact mostly with Americans. I would say that <3% have a serious, non-academically structured approach to nutrition. If you've ever downloaded and read a pop nutrition book, without it being for a class or physician-pushed dietary shift, then you're in a tiny minority(<10% of Americans). If you've downloaded and read a nutrition book that wasn't a pop nutrition book or for class or doctor diet, then you're an even tinier minority(<3%). If you're going to talk about nutrition, assume that the person you're speaking to knows no terminology, no chemistry, no historical literature, and certainly, no credulity about what you say. Beyond "do you have a peer-reviewed study?" most people take any printed word as 10x more legitimate than anything said out loud. Now, that is not to say that people will actually read that printed word and assess it's quality- many Americans "read" but do not read.
That being said, you also have to account for your audience. I find that conservatives are much easier to talk bioenergetics with due to pre-existing enjoyments of meat and skepticism about pharma/mainstream science. Milktoast liberals are open to discussions but will demand citations and will pester you with "I read a plant-based book written by a doctor, what do you think about it? Have you heard about Blue Zones?" More often that not, their questions are sincere and an answer that addresses the question clearly and fully will get you a positive response.
Leftists are often the most resistant to bioenergetic nutrition because you have to talk about the differences btwn animal and plant nutrition, which immediately gets walled-off with environmental and moral concerns. I rarely get a leftist argue against animal-based or bioenergetic diets on scientific grounds, but almost always get the response "cows cause climate change, you are killing the planet" or "I am plant-based because I don't like hurting animals." Leftists seek to make issues of nutrition and science into moral issues, without leniency on who's morality we're using. This is why I think Ray said he focused on nutrition, rather than politics because the radical movements are incapable of working together.
I would add that many American leftists crave a sense of moral worth, mostly because they are besieged by anti-Human propaganda. They can derive no positive moral feelings from being Human and alive, so they shift their moral feelings towards the animal, the plant, and the inanimate. Humanity and human institutions become lightning rods for a hodgepodge of apathy, (un)controlled outbursts, and catharsis. I think to how many leftists in my life were going to anti-police protests every single day for an entire summer and are now constantly complaining that "nothing has changed, we accomplished nothing, come to our reading group and mutual aid meeting on Thursday plz."
I'm getting off topic. My top three steps for simplifying bioenergetic discussions are these:
- Give positive encouragement regularly for someone asking questions or sharing information with you. Even if they're sending you a link to some tired vegan argument, say "I appreciate you sharing this with me, I have seen this argument before and I understand its roots, let's talk more about it." Americans need positive encouragement and replying "no, that's wrong and those people are wrong" is a great way to have people dismiss you, even if what you say is correct. For many Americans, they are raised with an idea that "you have to give someone a chance to explain themselves before you lecture them."
Positive encouragement, positive encouragement, positive encouragement. Encouraging questions makes it easier to let ideas and themes seem more like the person is coming up with them, rather than you imposing questions and themes. People who feel like you're listening to them will volunteer information, open up about skepticisms, and ultimately make it easy to say "y'know, you were saying earlier that your dad had heart disease but was a really healthy guy and didn't eat much fat. That's actually a really good observation that others have had and it's kind of a crazy story about the situation behind that. Want to hear it?" Never impose information on someone, give them the opportunity to say "yes, I would like to know more."
-
Emphasize that a bioenergetic diet is tasty. When people see on a forum some long list of "approved" foods, they check out. The food is not a plate with taste and smell, but rather a list. This goes for bioenergetics and many other diets. Most people don't conjure a delicious chickpea tikka masala when they see "chickpeas," they think about some grainy shit from a can that they only buy when a roommate wants to make the worst hummus ever. This is why Danny and others emphasize having tasty food pictures on social media, as a major part of the Peat propaganda effort.
-
Do not expect to win someone over in one conversation. My biggest Peat pillings have happened when someone and myself run into each other at our bar hangout over the course of a few weeks. Most people know they are unhealthy, their families are unhealthy, and the future is unhealthy. If you seem sincere about health and you're not pushing products on them, then people can be very receptive.
As an aside, I don't like encouraging people to "stop stressing so much." This isn't good advice and it ignores that many people's stresses are outside of their control. I encourage people to take steps to improve their quality of life, quality of job, etc. but never "don't stress so much."