The future is dysgenic
-
@JulofEnoch said in The future is dysgenic:
I don't have time or energy for Twitch
I have never understood how anybody can actually spend time watching livestreamers. Never spent a minute watching that stuff.
-
They aren't watching them, that's the worst part of it. The biggest demographic for many streamers is "second monitor" viewers who open a stream, put it on their second monitor, and just listen to the streamer while doing other things. The result is you've got a streamer with 3k viewers but maybe 100 are actually paying attention. This is why I've seen streamers increasingly moving into podcast content(either as a separate gig or as a stream), because they're already podcasters for 95% of their audience.
-
They may also be watching because they are horny, this is especially true for "Vutber" streamers.
-
@JulofEnoch said in The future is dysgenic:
just listen to the streamer while doing other things.
Big sign of low IQ for a person is claiming they can be productive while listening to shit like this in the background.
-
@Kilgore The ones you meet irl have halo just because they are 3 D. It’s the case everywhere ppl just delude themselves into thinking that mid tier becky in their classroom is Stacy, meanwhile go to her insta account and browse she’ll look plain ah . It’s why normies can get laid irl easier than apps cos even for them men look better irl, height frame halo etc but if chad had his way he’ll use apps cos that’s where the best looking frisky women are and only chad can make them leave their basement
-
@JulofEnoch Yeah this sounds more accurate than this elite celeb getting vaxxed to the max like a normie
-
@thyroidchor27 I don’t think the issue is chads losing the “edge” I think that as metabolism improves, men seek out different qualities in women in an attempt to make more “fit” children. For example an incel probably has low interpersonal experience with women and doesn’t understand that high degrees of physical beauty, especially pertaining to absolute thinness, tend to correlate highly to neuroticism - especially in a world that tells women the only way to be thin is to not eat.
In other words, incel = sexual drought. His fantasy is just “have sex,” so he naturally seeks out the ideal woman for one night of sex. Agreeableness and other long-term beneficial traits do not factor into this. Chad on the other hand does not have any issues getting sex so he’s more concerned with other factors when choosing a long-term partner.
-
@Sugar it could also be that Justin is a fag who was raped as a kid by music industry joos and who now has a wife and kid as a “beard.” Bad example I think.
Also I swear I’m not stalking your posts on this forum you just happen to be in 90% of the threads I find interesting.
-
-
@saturnuscv Funny enough in his situation he, just like female young celebrities like Miley Cyrus, made an attempt to destroy his look and accelerate twink death. Who knows what all he's been through. He's a good example of a high progesterone pretty boy at least in his prime. Someone that would've had a statue in ancient greece times, or today if the world wasn't so cringe.
-
@saturnuscv thin women look worse than fat women tho. And ive seen giga fat women look very lean on the faces with defined submentals and jawline. Nature is very forgiving on women, while men can put on 4 kg and lose all bone defiintion
-
@thyroidchor27 said in The future is dysgenic:
The ones you meet irl have halo just because they are 3 D. It’s the case everywhere ppl just delude themselves into thinking that mid tier becky in their classroom is Stacy, meanwhile go to her insta account and browse she’ll look plain ah . It’s why normies can get laid irl easier than apps cos even for them men look better irl, height frame halo etc but if chad had his way he’ll use apps cos that’s where the best looking frisky women are and only chad can make them leave their basement
I have completely lost you here now. What is exactly your problem?
My take: Women on apps are less good looking and the good looking women are less likely to be on the apps.
Then you say: Women are better looking on apps than IRL. (Obviously taking photos and using filters/Photoshop will make them improve their looks I agree)Then you say:
you just tend to overrate women irl cause they are 3d. Go home and look at their pics and then go on app. Apps have bigger subhumans but also better looking
They are better looking on apps because of the filter/photoshop editing. "bigger subhumans" so you agree with me.
The ones you meet irl have halo just because they are 3 D. It’s the case everywhere ppl just delude themselves into thinking that mid tier becky in their classroom is Stacy, meanwhile go to her insta account and browse she’ll look plain ah . It’s why normies can get laid irl easier than apps cos even for them men look better irl, height frame halo etc but if chad had his way he’ll use apps cos that’s where the best looking frisky women are and only chad can make them leave their basement
I am so confused lol.
thin women look worse than fat women tho.
No. But I agree that fatties can have beautiful faces aswell. I like big apple cheeks on women. You can always tell a womans weight by her upper arm anyway.
Nature is very forgiving on women, while men can put on 4 kg and lose all bone defiintion
Agree on that.
-
@Kilgore it’s basic distribution. Apps have a higher percentage of subhumans and the top tier women. Irl you don’t see so many subhumans not as many top tier ( fixing for how many people you’re exposed to). No they’re better looking on apps because they’re better looking Jfl. That cute girl in class you sat next to wouldn’t look as good if you went on her Facebook and saw an unedited group picture. The top tier woman on dating apps don’t fraud and are top tier full stop, you can easily tell who’s frauding and who’s not from the lighting conditions, skin texture, angle and posing , number of pictures. You overrate the looks of people you meet irl( the girls anyway)