New "Mission" of RPF
-
@Peatly said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Charlie owns lifegivingstore which is not registered under the name Charles Mathers
Charlie acknowledges here that "Debra" runs Life Giving Store which matches the female name in the LLC registration data for both companies mentioned previously.
Charlie says Debra is "part of my family"
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/cholesterol-powder-steroid-hormone-precursor-available-for-lab-research-use.19436/Where is the thread where Charlie says he owns Life Giving Store? All I see is these 2017-2019 posts where he "pretends" to be a customer praising their products in the forum threads.
-
This post is deleted! -
@ilovethesea What's very, very odd is that the attachment in the "Carbon Dioxide, Glycation" thread by user "frustrated" was added by edit years later. Because the attachment is date stamped October 15, 2014 and the comment in the thread is Feb 14 2013.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/organic-whole-bean-coffee-suggestions-and-grinder.1090/
Also, the comment in the "Organic Whole Bean Coffee" thread was also edited later by user "sctb" because his comment was even earlier on Jan 13, 2013 and the attachment is dated August 16 2014. Why go and add this "doxxing" image 1+ year later to different threads by different users?
-
@jwayne said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@ilovethesea What's very, very odd is that the attachment in the "Carbon Dioxide, Glycation" thread by user "frustrated" was added by edit years later. Because the attachment is date stamped August 16 2014 and the comment in the thread is Feb 14 2013. Also, the comment in the "Organic Whole Bean Coffee" thread (which seems to be the original) was also edited later by user "sctb" because his comment was even earlier on Jan 13, 2013. But at least the context matches as the image appears to be coffee related. But why go and add this "doxxing" image 1+ year later to different threads by different users?
The same attachment of the box with Charlie Mathers on the shipping label was also posted by "Charlie" himself! This time with no context whatsoever. And the date is totally wrong again with the comment appearing Feb 23, 2013. The attachment is date-stamped November 17, 2014 in that one.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/progesterone.227/page-7
The same image appears out of context everywhere in different threads of a box from Thailand by "PimPomProduct.com" (lots of references to PimPom on the forum) addressed the Charlie Mathers on the receipt.
Thyroid order- Posted by "Charlie" https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/matt-stone-on-peat.893/page-2
By user "Beebop", no context https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/robert-lustig-on-bbc-radio-4-pm.1358/
By user "jaguar43", no context https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/ray-peat-diet-two-weeks-in-signs-not-good.1308/
-
@jwayne The only person who would have an unboxxing photo would be the receiver after getting the package. But how did these come to be uploaded to the forum? I don't know why you would photograph all of them to begin with. It looks like some kind of mistake that these were posted but I don't know how that would happen except by a moderator. And he has no reason to do that.
-
This is worth a listen for the first eighteen minutes or so (toward the end it jumps to something else), I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons). It's huge motivation to do what some of us suspect they have done with the RPF and for the phony theories being propagated. He's written well-cited books covering these subjects if you require further reference.
https://x.com/BryceMLipscomb/status/1776324251848458379
-
@C-Mex
The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsuLBPjdt-w
P.s. I'm sorry about some on this island. To be continued.
-
That's horrible, why would they change something that already works???
-
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@C-Mex
The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.
Not the same topic though.
-
@C-Mex
It absolutely is the same topic C-Mex. But you're absolutely entitled to conclude I have the wrong end of the stick.
"I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons)"
All of it is done under corporate labels. Which is why you can't touch any of the humans beings responsible for it.
-
It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.
-
@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.
Keep your alans on C-Mex (that's London humour). I offered the fundamental part of the pitch from the person you brought in to the thread. He's right.
Just have a think about how you intend to change those things. If you propose to lobby representatives to legislate. Does it not stand to reason that existing legislation should be examined in the process. What exactly is it that makes a man untouchable. And how can they learn when they are so.
A talking head on Twitter or YouTube is unlikely to be popular in attempt to point this out.
-
RFK Jr is not a talking head on Twitter, which is the video I posted. I have no interest in engaging you on other topics.
Watch the video folks. They don't want you to see it.
-
@C-Mex
I didn't say he was. A video of a man at a podium is not that.
You need to calm down in order to think.
-
No, I've decided to just ignore your stupid little diversions and riddles while contributing absolutely nothing to the conversation. Confuse and distract.
-
@C-Mex
Your visceral reaction doesn't indicate you're ignoring anything. And I'm not here to win a popularity contest.
Over to your sleep and subconscious. God be with you.
-
If that was what you were looking for with your psych profiles, you didn't get it. You're an annoying little moth that I finally decided to take a swat at.
-
@C-Mex
Love you too C-Mex.
-
OK that got a laugh out of me, but I'm not backing down. This is total distraction.
-
@jwayne I’ve ordered from Thai thyroid sellers in the past (can’t remember if it was Pim Pom) and that is standard for them to take a photo of the package before sending it to you. I did notice the date stamp was off - that may just be a matter of messed up camera settings.
But it doesn’t explain why the photo was shared so many times out of context and posted by other people who aren’t “Charlie”.
