New "Mission" of RPF
-
This post is deleted! -
@ilovethesea What's very, very odd is that the attachment in the "Carbon Dioxide, Glycation" thread by user "frustrated" was added by edit years later. Because the attachment is date stamped October 15, 2014 and the comment in the thread is Feb 14 2013.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/organic-whole-bean-coffee-suggestions-and-grinder.1090/
Also, the comment in the "Organic Whole Bean Coffee" thread was also edited later by user "sctb" because his comment was even earlier on Jan 13, 2013 and the attachment is dated August 16 2014. Why go and add this "doxxing" image 1+ year later to different threads by different users?
-
@jwayne said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@ilovethesea What's very, very odd is that the attachment in the "Carbon Dioxide, Glycation" thread by user "frustrated" was added by edit years later. Because the attachment is date stamped August 16 2014 and the comment in the thread is Feb 14 2013. Also, the comment in the "Organic Whole Bean Coffee" thread (which seems to be the original) was also edited later by user "sctb" because his comment was even earlier on Jan 13, 2013. But at least the context matches as the image appears to be coffee related. But why go and add this "doxxing" image 1+ year later to different threads by different users?
The same attachment of the box with Charlie Mathers on the shipping label was also posted by "Charlie" himself! This time with no context whatsoever. And the date is totally wrong again with the comment appearing Feb 23, 2013. The attachment is date-stamped November 17, 2014 in that one.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/progesterone.227/page-7
The same image appears out of context everywhere in different threads of a box from Thailand by "PimPomProduct.com" (lots of references to PimPom on the forum) addressed the Charlie Mathers on the receipt.
Thyroid order- Posted by "Charlie" https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/matt-stone-on-peat.893/page-2
By user "Beebop", no context https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/robert-lustig-on-bbc-radio-4-pm.1358/
By user "jaguar43", no context https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/ray-peat-diet-two-weeks-in-signs-not-good.1308/
-
@jwayne The only person who would have an unboxxing photo would be the receiver after getting the package. But how did these come to be uploaded to the forum? I don't know why you would photograph all of them to begin with. It looks like some kind of mistake that these were posted but I don't know how that would happen except by a moderator. And he has no reason to do that.
-
This is worth a listen for the first eighteen minutes or so (toward the end it jumps to something else), I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons). It's huge motivation to do what some of us suspect they have done with the RPF and for the phony theories being propagated. He's written well-cited books covering these subjects if you require further reference.
https://x.com/BryceMLipscomb/status/1776324251848458379
-
@C-Mex
The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsuLBPjdt-w
P.s. I'm sorry about some on this island. To be continued.
-
That's horrible, why would they change something that already works???
-
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@C-Mex
The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.
Not the same topic though.
-
@C-Mex
It absolutely is the same topic C-Mex. But you're absolutely entitled to conclude I have the wrong end of the stick.
"I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons)"
All of it is done under corporate labels. Which is why you can't touch any of the humans beings responsible for it.
-
It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.
-
@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.
Keep your alans on C-Mex (that's London humour). I offered the fundamental part of the pitch from the person you brought in to the thread. He's right.
Just have a think about how you intend to change those things. If you propose to lobby representatives to legislate. Does it not stand to reason that existing legislation should be examined in the process. What exactly is it that makes a man untouchable. And how can they learn when they are so.
A talking head on Twitter or YouTube is unlikely to be popular in attempt to point this out.
-
RFK Jr is not a talking head on Twitter, which is the video I posted. I have no interest in engaging you on other topics.
Watch the video folks. They don't want you to see it.
-
@C-Mex
I didn't say he was. A video of a man at a podium is not that.
You need to calm down in order to think.
-
No, I've decided to just ignore your stupid little diversions and riddles while contributing absolutely nothing to the conversation. Confuse and distract.
-
@C-Mex
Your visceral reaction doesn't indicate you're ignoring anything. And I'm not here to win a popularity contest.
Over to your sleep and subconscious. God be with you.
-
If that was what you were looking for with your psych profiles, you didn't get it. You're an annoying little moth that I finally decided to take a swat at.
-
@C-Mex
Love you too C-Mex.
-
OK that got a laugh out of me, but I'm not backing down. This is total distraction.
-
@jwayne I’ve ordered from Thai thyroid sellers in the past (can’t remember if it was Pim Pom) and that is standard for them to take a photo of the package before sending it to you. I did notice the date stamp was off - that may just be a matter of messed up camera settings.
But it doesn’t explain why the photo was shared so many times out of context and posted by other people who aren’t “Charlie”.
-
Dropping back in for a spot of low effort analysis.
Seems likely to me "Charlie Mathers" is a pseudonym he adopted somewhere between supply chain management and trust issues. If I were in business and drop shipping I might consider doing the same thing. Although personally I'd rather get chummy with a supplier and actually Trust them.
His "FTC mandated disclosure of material connection" reads reasonably (for anyone still able to see it, which everyone should as it's supposed to be "clear and conspicuous", but that's a minor really). It alludes to "my company" and names it. And the agents of that are in the public domain as they should be. I have to give a man props for obeying the law, just about.
I really don't think there's much untoward going on with this guy, beyond stupidity, obstinance and a spot of pride (no offence "Charlie", we all get there and we all have to escape, again and again probably).
I can't explain the schizo appearances of those images and don't care enough to speculate. Meh.
As for the ZoomInfo thing. Potential sources have been have been painted. The "Cancer Research" thing pinched me in particular. But for all I know, someone in Cambridge has simply been paying attention to that place, and stored it in an Outlook contact entry with their address. I have no idea really. But if it's that, good. Let them read it. And weep. For you can't hold the tide with a broom.
And the Garrett fandom, I think he's just a bit of an opportunist himself. Garrett's "popular", he's a "believer", he has a "new" "way" and he's "alive". So "Charlie" jumps on the bandwagon, convinces himself he's feeling better and thinks he can shift some product around it. "Peating" wasn't working for him but made a buck or two. He couldn't separate the noise in discussions or simply ask for help. To be fair to him there, I'd rather figure it out myself most of the time. But I'm careful to correct my cardiac tone before I try and use my brain, and I have no idea the extent to which that human's been failed in life. It matters.
