New "Mission" of RPF
-
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@C-Mex
The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.
Not the same topic though.
-
@C-Mex
It absolutely is the same topic C-Mex. But you're absolutely entitled to conclude I have the wrong end of the stick.
"I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons)"
All of it is done under corporate labels. Which is why you can't touch any of the humans beings responsible for it.
-
It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.
-
@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.
Keep your alans on C-Mex (that's London humour). I offered the fundamental part of the pitch from the person you brought in to the thread. He's right.
Just have a think about how you intend to change those things. If you propose to lobby representatives to legislate. Does it not stand to reason that existing legislation should be examined in the process. What exactly is it that makes a man untouchable. And how can they learn when they are so.
A talking head on Twitter or YouTube is unlikely to be popular in attempt to point this out.
-
RFK Jr is not a talking head on Twitter, which is the video I posted. I have no interest in engaging you on other topics.
Watch the video folks. They don't want you to see it.
-
@C-Mex
I didn't say he was. A video of a man at a podium is not that.
You need to calm down in order to think.
-
No, I've decided to just ignore your stupid little diversions and riddles while contributing absolutely nothing to the conversation. Confuse and distract.
-
@C-Mex
Your visceral reaction doesn't indicate you're ignoring anything. And I'm not here to win a popularity contest.
Over to your sleep and subconscious. God be with you.
-
If that was what you were looking for with your psych profiles, you didn't get it. You're an annoying little moth that I finally decided to take a swat at.
-
@C-Mex
Love you too C-Mex.
-
OK that got a laugh out of me, but I'm not backing down. This is total distraction.
-
@jwayne I’ve ordered from Thai thyroid sellers in the past (can’t remember if it was Pim Pom) and that is standard for them to take a photo of the package before sending it to you. I did notice the date stamp was off - that may just be a matter of messed up camera settings.
But it doesn’t explain why the photo was shared so many times out of context and posted by other people who aren’t “Charlie”.
-
Dropping back in for a spot of low effort analysis.
Seems likely to me "Charlie Mathers" is a pseudonym he adopted somewhere between supply chain management and trust issues. If I were in business and drop shipping I might consider doing the same thing. Although personally I'd rather get chummy with a supplier and actually Trust them.
His "FTC mandated disclosure of material connection" reads reasonably (for anyone still able to see it, which everyone should as it's supposed to be "clear and conspicuous", but that's a minor really). It alludes to "my company" and names it. And the agents of that are in the public domain as they should be. I have to give a man props for obeying the law, just about.
I really don't think there's much untoward going on with this guy, beyond stupidity, obstinance and a spot of pride (no offence "Charlie", we all get there and we all have to escape, again and again probably).
I can't explain the schizo appearances of those images and don't care enough to speculate. Meh.
As for the ZoomInfo thing. Potential sources have been have been painted. The "Cancer Research" thing pinched me in particular. But for all I know, someone in Cambridge has simply been paying attention to that place, and stored it in an Outlook contact entry with their address. I have no idea really. But if it's that, good. Let them read it. And weep. For you can't hold the tide with a broom.
And the Garrett fandom, I think he's just a bit of an opportunist himself. Garrett's "popular", he's a "believer", he has a "new" "way" and he's "alive". So "Charlie" jumps on the bandwagon, convinces himself he's feeling better and thinks he can shift some product around it. "Peating" wasn't working for him but made a buck or two. He couldn't separate the noise in discussions or simply ask for help. To be fair to him there, I'd rather figure it out myself most of the time. But I'm careful to correct my cardiac tone before I try and use my brain, and I have no idea the extent to which that human's been failed in life. It matters.
-
In case anyone else is inclined to imply I'm here for "distraction". Budding investigative journalists. Crack on if you want to.
-
@jwayne said in New "Mission" of RPF:
"This forum will never be private"
Read the whole thread.
Good catch!
@ilovethesea said in Charlie's Motivation? His New Avatar Is Holding A Gun In It's Mouth! Savior Complex? Businessman? Or Has The raypeatforum Owner Lost His Mind?:
Both Garrett and Charlie now have guns in their avatars BTW...
Also a good one.
On the left, we have the first lion that needs to resort to guns to intimidate. On the right, a naturopath holding an atypical stethoscope in the avatar of a private account reserved for friends.
-
Looking around, it is hard to find any independent reporting on the Wellcome Trust at Cambridge. Is there any, or is it just being buried by the search engines?
Who provides any oversight on the influence and activites of 'philanthropists' like Gates in academia? Universites are the perfect place to recruit and indoctrinate people and then send them out in the world credentialed to spread your 'vision'. The already captured mainstream media appears to also have been bought by Gates.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-media-objectively/
-
-
This website has some interesting articles covering sweeping topics under Gang Stalking, Mind Control, and Cults, but from a brief review there's some clues as to how 'domestic terrorists' (Trump supporters?) are being used to justify gov't-sponsored info warfare against civilians.
https://gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/cognitive-warfare-june-november-2020-francois-du-cluzel/
-
The Wellcome Trust in Africa. These people haven’t got a clue that this is all about eugenics.
-
Wellcome is just a big pharma operation under the name of philanthropy. It is self-supporting and advances the 'research' that supports its interests.
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2017/1/12/wellcome-trust-grants-gates
