New "Mission" of RPF
-
I think it has to do with the Cloudflare service.
-
@C-Mex Interesting that the registry was JUST updated on Jan. 11, 2024. Maybe that is when he transferred ownership to whatever entity is in the UK.
-
@ilovethesea said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Mulloch94 said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@ilovethesea He probably hosting the site on a server stationed in the UK. It's not a uncommon thing to see for people hosting a web site. Maybe that's why he's also charging people money now. He might have gotten tired paying for it after all these years.
The server is Cloudflare which is US based.
https://iplocation.io/website-server-software/raypeatforum.comThis is bombshell info if we are reading this right. The RPF has been a fraud from the beginning.
-
Was the registry address changed?
-
@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I think it has to do with the Cloudflare service.
The Iceland thing is Namecheap which is where he originally registered the domain - talks about it here https://www.namecheap.com/blog/domain-privacy-is-changing-at-namecheap/
-
Oh, I see where you are getting that. Actually I think that is just like a renewal for the domain name. A similar search for raypeat.com shows it was updated (extended I think) until 2026, but that doesn't imply any address change I don't think.
-
@ilovethesea said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Tennis Ct Rd, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 1PD, United Kingdom”
This address is associated with Cambridge University
-
Makes me think of the great work by Mike Benz, where the now mature censorship industry has taken root in gov't cutouts within academia like Stanford's Internet 'Observatory' and think tanks like the Atlantic Council, doing the work the gov't is prohibited doing by law. I feel like the RPF is some kind of 'counter-misinformation' project funded by the Uniparty on both sides of the pond.
-
@C-Mex Oh okay that makes sense. There is an archived version of that page on SimilarWeb but it won’t give access https://web.archive.org/web/20230301174108/https://www.similarweb.com/website/raypeatforum.com/
For what it’s worth I just looked up my own projects on SimilarWeb and the address is 100% accurate. Not sure how it knows.
Edit - I guess Cambridge is some kind of spook university?? It says here it has links to British intelligence. https://consortiumnews.com/2022/12/21/cambridge-universitys-course-for-spooks/
-
@ilovethesea said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Edit - I guess Cambridge is some kind of spook university?? It says here it has links to British intelligence. https://consortiumnews.com/2022/12/21/cambridge-universitys-course-for-spooks/
Plus the CIA, French Security Services and others I don't recognize offhand. -
These people don't suddenly take over an online forum from some dude in Florida.
-
@ilovethesea
Yes, Cambridge, and Oxford too I imagine. I follow somewhat Alex Thomson, who was with the UKcolumn.org for years, and is now on Telegram. He graduated from Cambridge and said that one either went into Finance or Gov't. Read as Mi6 (spy or whatever). He went to GCHQ himself and was an officer there. He got out, and moved to Holland. He is a polyglot/interpreter, and super brilliant. Worth checking out. -
@ilovethesea Makes sense to me.
I think Charlie is long gone. He took the offer he could not refuse. Now the agents are demolishing all legacy.
-
@ilovethesea said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Tennis Ct Rd, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 1PD, United Kingdom”If you do a search on CB2 1PD the first results that come up are for the Deparment of Pharmacology.
-
@Regina said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@ilovethesea Makes sense to me.
I think Charlie is long gone. He took the offer he could not refuse. Now the agents are demolishing all legacy.
IMO, it's much worse than that. I think it was a front from the beginning.
-
@C-Mex Wow I think we’ve just found the smoking gun
Before that Zoominfo page gets erased here are the screenshots of the address
-
@C-Mex Maybe.
-
Just a quick look at Wikipedia shows that a number of measures for controlling internet content were proposed around 2011 and didn't pass. Didn't the RFP start in 2012? Later on Obama authorized some of these measures in 2015. It seems the gov't was quite concerned with internet content (and the names of these things sometimes belie their true intent) around the time or just before the RPF was established by an unknown individual or entity.
Edit: At the time the RPF was started, there were already a number of FB groups discussing Ray Peat's work, and likely others elsewhere.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_United_States
*Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act (PCNAA)
The Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act was introduced in 2010 but did not become law.[67]The proposed Act caused controversy for what critics perceived as its authorization for the U.S. president to apply a full block of the Internet in the U.S.[68]
A new bill, the Executive Cyberspace Coordination Act of 2011, was under consideration by the U.S. Congress in 2011.[69] The new bill addresses many of the same issues as, but takes quite a different approach from the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act.*
*Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA)
The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) was a proposed law introduced in November 2011, with the stated goal of giving the U.S. government additional options and resources to ensure the security of networks against attacks.[76] It was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in April 2012 but was not passed by the U.S. Senate. The bill was reintroduced in the House in February 2013[77] and again in January 2015. While this bill never became law, a similar bill from the U.S. Senate, the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA), was incorporated by amendment into a consolidated spending bill in the U.S. House on December 15, 2015,[44] and was signed into law by President Barack Obama on December 18, 2015.[78]*
-
@ilovethesea said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@C-Mex Wow I think we’ve just found the smoking gun
You found it. Great work.
-
@Regina said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@C-Mex Maybe.
The reason I think so is because big pharma is undeniably part of the military-industrial-complex and the CIA's job is to keep all of them in business and recognize and neutralize threats. First they needed to infiltrate then begin to seed the truth with disinformation. After Ray Peat's death, they went full on with the election coming. Still, you think they could have come up with something better than 'toxic vitamin a', lol. Maybe that's just a testament to how solid Ray Peat's work is.