Conditional problems with vitamin A: a place for sane discussions
-
Thank you for this. I wonder if i would get banned for posting this in ray peat forum now.
-
@Verdad I doubt it. None of the people left there would even understand half of what A. wrote.
-
@Kvothe He has terrific word play, Calcium = Kilcium, love that Guy
-
@Not_James_Bond we all do
-
You guys should look into the RXR. Its a very interesting nuclear receptor.
-
@Kvothe I would not be surprised he seems to be basically banning anyone who disagrees with him. He sounds like a deranged cult leader i think it will not be long till he bans anyone posting anything that goes against his theories.
Soon it will be if you post a positive study about Vitamin A or calcium it will be a banning ofense.
-
On niacin for NAD
Nicotinamide is now regarded as toxic and nicotinic acid is being favored. It's supplemented intending to increase the synthesis of NAD to detoxify poisons.
They're not using pharmacological amounts of niacin that would lead to marked differences in how each form is eliminated. The moderate doses in use should be readily converted to nicotinamide. This is how forms are metabolized in mice:
The Management of Nicotinamide and Nicotinic Acid in the Mouse
DPN = NAD
desDPN = NaAD (immediate precursor to NAD)
↳ 'des' here stands for 'desamidated' NAD.
Nicotinamide as yield happens with nicotinamide riboside or mononucleotide too:
"NR and NMN were administered by i.v. bolus or oral gavage at 50 mg/kg, which is equivalent to 290 mg in a 70-kg human on a body surface area basis, in the range of common nutraceuticals."
"Unlike in cell culture, where NR and NMN are readily incorporated into NAD (Ratajczak et al., 2016; Frederick et al., 2016), oral administration fails to deliver NR or NMN to tissues without breaking the nicotinamide-ribose bond."
"Irrespective of the route of delivery, the main circulating product of the administered NR or NMN was NAM, which increased by ~20⨯ within 5 min of i.v. NR or NMN; oral NR or NMN administration led to a more modest rise in circulating NAM (Figure 7C)."
I wonder how they justify their aversion to nicotinamide in moderate doses.
-
@thyroidchor27 said in Conditional problems with vitamin A: a place for sane discussions:
Vitamin A increases SCD1 7x. That alone is reason to take it easy
Retinoic acids levels are kept relatively stable. What are the conditions for it to occur?
Guys, it was member 'schultz' who started the kill- term trend.
I now have a support page!
-
@Amazoniac in the plasma or in the liver????
-
They pride themselves on the fact that it's possible to put psoriasis into remission through poison A deprivation, but what about Coimbra's experiment who accomplished the same with "vitamin" D3 (875 mcg/d) and minor dietary modifications?
These approaches work, but are rudimentary. They manipulate upstream processes rather favoring targeting downstream specifics, that minimize the risk of having to compromise other functions to reach the therapeutic dose (for low or for high).
Psoriasis and beyond: targeting the IL-17 pathway | Nature
Even though targeting what's downstream is more sophisticated, the best thing to do is to try to address the pathogen above it all.
I now have a support page!
-
@thyroidchor27 said in Conditional problems with vitamin A: a place for sane discussions:
@Amazoniac in the plasma or in the liver????
That claim is based on what?
-
By the way, you can find various reports of 'undetectable' vitamin D levels; some because of analysis error (it can be challenging to quantify toxins that occur in modest amounts), but others not.
Controlling the availability of the precursor molecule can be a means to make up for an overactive pathway:
Undetectable serum calcidiol: not everything that glitters is gold
"Granulomatous hypercalcaemia is particularly sensitive to vitamin D administration even though toxic 25(OH) vitamin D levels are not reached [5]. This has been attributed to avid 25(OH) vitamin D metabolism into 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D by macrophage 1α-hydroxylase. Availability of 25(OH) vitamin D becomes the main regulator of 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D synthesis. Under these circumstances, treatment of vitamin D deficiency will increase the availability of 25(OH) vitamin D and lead to high 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D levels and hypercalcaemia [8, 9]."
-
@Amazoniac said in Conditional problems with vitamin A: a place for sane discussions:
They pride themselves on the fact that it's possible to put psoriasis into remission through poison A deprivation, but what about Coimbra's experiment who accomplished the same with "vitamin" D3 (875 mcg/d) and minor dietary modifications?
Have they presented any evidence regarding vitamin A deprivation and psiorasis, except tweets from good guy Garret Smith and the bible?
-
@Kvothe, I'm going by trust in the accounts of reliable people.
I now have a support page!
-
@Amazoniac Are there any in that crowd, and have they controlled their conclusions for other variables? The highly restrictive diets they eat exclude a huge lists of potential irritants that might cause auto-immune conditions and symptoms.
-
@Kvothe said in Conditional problems with vitamin A: a place for sane discussions:
@Amazoniac Are there any in that crowd, and have they controlled their conclusions for other variables? The highly restrictive diets they eat exclude a huge lists of potential irritants that might cause auto-immune conditions and symptoms.
'Maybe' to both questions. However, the accounts would be founded.
The Effect of Restricted Intake of Carotene and Vitamin A on Psoriasis Vulgaris
The exclusion of other toxins can contribute to the remission, but I don't think that the addition of isolated poisons to their current diets would lead to positive outcomes.
I now have a support page!
-
@Amazoniac Several people have shown me that paper when I asked for evidence that restriction of vitamin A improves psoriasis. I am sceptical. The authors note that most of the improvements and even complete clearing occured as early as 4/16 weeks after the start of the intervention. That's not nearly enough to significantly deplete retinol stores, especially on a diet that was low, but not insignificant in vitamin A, and it points to something more immediate.
Psoriasis is obviously not caused by excess vitamin A. People with psoriasis, in fact, tend to have lower levels of serum and hepatic retinol, and do not consume excess quantities of it. The underlying cause is found in other processes, and disturbances in the local retinol metabolites are an effect but not the cause of the problem. -
@Kvothe, a diet low in poisons leads to remission and returning with the normal diet results in relapse. Their supplementation without a change in diet does the same. Unless we assume that carotene metabolites are interfering with the action of poisonoic acids or it's disturbing the cell after being incorporated in fatty regions, we have to entertain the other options.
It wouldn't take a minimum of a month to notice the first positive effects from the exclusion of other irritants from the diet, but would match the decrease in circulating carotenes.
-
Cyclosporine is also an effective treatment for psoriasis. Given the extensive evidence of vitamin A’s role in immune function, I think it is more likely that psoriasis improvement with a depleting diet is a side effect of immune suppression instead of a root cause being discovered.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11375434
“Vitamin A deficiency impairs innate immunity by impeding normal regeneration of mucosal barriers damaged by infection, and by diminishing the function of neutrophils, macrophages, and natural killer cells. Vitamin A is also required for adaptive immunity and plays a role in the development of T both-helper (Th) cells and B-cells. In particular, vitamin A deficiency diminishes antibody-mediated responses directed by Th2 cells, although some aspects of Th1-mediated immunity are also diminished.”
-
It directs to..
a) Professor Smith:
"If a person takes in more toxic "vit" A than they excrete on a regular basis, then they are ACCUMULATING it in their liver and bodyfat
If 306 mcg beta-carotene (that's 1020 IU, one carrot has 6000 IU!) took 58 DAYS to turn over...do you realize just how fast you are filling up with this toxin?
1 beta-carotene eventually has to split into 2 retinaldehydes"
b) Disciple:
"Wow.
And this is also a great study for showing how much beta-carotene is actually converted to retinol. They write a minimum of 62% is turned into retinol. So a lot will eventually go the retinol route.
"What is clear is that, by our estimates, a minimum of 62% of the absorbed β-carotene was cleaved to vitamin A and by this reasoning the vitamin A value of β-carotene dose was 0.53. [The calculation is as follows: Assuming central cleavage, 1 mol of β-carotene yields 2 mol of vitamin A. If 62% of the absorbed β-carotene were cleaved to vitamin A, 1 mol of β-carotene would yield 1.24 mol of vitamin A. Thus, the vitamin A value of the absorbed dose is 1.24. Yet, the dose was 42.6% absorbed. So, the actual vitamin A value is (1.24) (0.426) or 0.53.]"
1 molecule of beta-carotene turns into 2 molecules of "active vitamin A".
The 0.53 value means that 1mg of ingested beta-carotene will turn into 0.5mg retinol. In other words, one medium carrot (eaten with lots of fat) can be equivalent to 27g beef liver.
Due to the time-delayed conversion, an acute poisoning is not possible, but a chronic poisoning is."
Their claims:
- a) "[..]one carrot has 6000 IU!" (1,800 mcg)
- b) "[..]one medium carrot (eaten with lots of fat) can be equivalent to 27g beef liver."
Beef liver:
- Poisonol 10,000 mcg/100 g
Carrot:
- Alpha-carotene: 2,000 mcg/carrot
- Beta-carotene: 5,000 mcg/carrot
We can disconsider half of the alpha-carotene amount and treat the other half as beta-carotene:
Beef liver:
- Poisonol 10,000 mcg/100 g
Carrot:
- Beta-carotene: 6,000 mcg/carrot
The author of the second post seems to be into the topic of poison A for a while, yet for some reason acts as if the information presented in the mentioned experiment was novel. These equivalences are found in almost all textbooks, even the main sections of the dedicated Wikipedia page have them, suggesting that pure b-macabrotene has half of the activity of poisonol:
- 1 µg RAE = 1 µg retinol from food or supplements
- 1 µg RAE = 2 µg all-trans-β-carotene from supplements
Now the equivalences from their claims:
- a) 1 µg RAE = 3.3 µg of all-trans-β-carotene from carrots
- b) 1 µg RAE = 2 µg of all-trans-β-carotene from carrots
The disciple is basing his equivalence on the following values from the linked experiment:
- Absorption: 42.6%
- Conversion: 62%
- Total (42.6% × 62%): 26%
This is close to a quarter, that results in a mass equivalence of about poison 1:4 b-mac, not 1:2 as he's arguing.
The source of confusion is because he's applying a molar to a mass ratio. B-carotene can yield two poisonols, but the mass is going to remain similar after cleavage and metabolism, with minor gains from the incorporation of new elements (that I'm going to disregard).
To arrive on his value:
- 26% × 2 = 53% (0.53)
It would've been preferable for the disciple to state:
"The 0.53 value means that 1 mg of ingested beta-carotene will turn into
0.5mg~0.25 mg retinol." The factor accounted for the potential of b-carotene to yield two poisonols, so it has to be applied after we halve the amount.At this stage, we can already discard the idea that a carrot will poison you as an ounce beef liver.
The spinach used in the quoted experiment served to tag macabrotene, the plant assimilated the labeled carbon of CO2 from the environment, allowing them to track the poison. But when it was time to contaminate the victim, the macabrotene was isolated and given in purified form at a low dose.
The food matrix lowers the availability of toxins, making them more difficult to be extracted, which is why researchers define a marked drop in efficiency when the b-macabrotene is derived from foods:
- 1 µg RAE = 1 µg retinol from food or supplements
- 1 µg RAE = 2 µg all-trans-β-carotene from supplements
- 1 µg RAE = 12 µg of all-trans-β-carotene from food
If we ignore this factor and pretend that fibrous carrots are an oil, the amount used in the experiment was modest (300 mcg) and we know that the rate of absorption and conversion tends to decrease as the dose gets high.
But let's reject this too and assume that it remains uninhibited up to 6 mg or so. However, the adjustment is beyond the meal content, the degree of body contamination with the poison is another factor that determines its fate. It's why the purity of the victim matters to interpret the dosing response to carotenoids: contaminated and decontaminated persons will metabolize it differently. When the body is overloaded, the rate of conversion to retinoids is reduced. To a lesser extent, the same goes for their absorption. Yet, carotenoids can be excreted intact.
"1 beta-carotene eventually has to split into 2 retinaldehydes"
It doesn't. His own equivalence conflicts with this claim, even if we discount the unabsorbed fraction (and he probably didn't):
"1 beta-carotene eventually has to split into 2 retinaldehydes":
- 6,000 mcg b-carotene → about 6,000 mcg PAE
"1 [absorbed] beta-carotene eventually has to split into 2 retinaldehydes":
- 6,000 mcg b-carotene → about 2,500 mcg PAE
"[..]one carrot has 6000 IU!":
- 6,000 mcg b-carotene → about 1,800 mcg PAE
Which is it?
"If you take something more than you can excrete, you accumulate"
Of course.
"If 306 mcg beta-carotene (that's 1020 IU, one carrot has 6000 IU!) took 58 DAYS to turn over...do you realize just how fast you are filling up with this toxin?"
A long half-life doesn't result in an indefinite accumulation, only until a steady state is reached, when poisoning for profits should plateau with regular consumption. Something like this in dosing more often:
Source: the internet.Some accumulation is normal and healthy; or should we treat macabrotenoids as toxins to be nuked from the body at all costs? "Vitamin" E is a toxin too (Smith, 2023), but is it harmful when it's not detoxified fast enough to avoid a detectable level, leading to 'accumulation' to be associated with problems?
Consider this: you consume a meal, whose elimination would take 24 hours. Instead of waiting for this period to eat the next, you consume multiple meals in between (may be 4 in a day), that result in accumulation of matter, but without issues. The accumulation is temporary, purposeful and the body is adapted to it. It's not immediate, but the matter eventually leaves the body to the extent that it's consumed: no stuffing until explosion occurs because the input matches the output despite the delay.
Excess carotenoids or calories should come with signs. The early stages are benign, will indicate that the person has to cut back or improve the capacity to handle them. Yet, carotenemia isn't reliable to diagnose poison A toxicity because it can be caused for different reasons (such as lack of nutrients or poor protein synthesis). As an example, if a person needs to take supplemental thyroid hormones and suddenly stops the treatment, it can be followed by carotenemia.
The rate of storage and mobilization is adaptable as well. In case someone discontinues the consumption of poisons altogether, it can signal conservation and a longer persistence in the body. Therefore, the length is variable.
All in all, while we have people debating whether an inability to convert macabrotenes is common or a real concern for persons who don't consume preformed poisons, we have the poison A crowd alarming you that regular carrot consumption is a ticket to the hospital over time, for having the same potential of destruction as liver in the diet, neglecting the multiple steps that regulate these toxins as drugs. #toxicbileapocalypse
