Why is the Ray Peat community so far right?
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe Western societies are only industrial societies for a bit more than 100 years. Except for the UK, real industrialization started with World war 1.
Since then Western societies have been firmly on the left, looking for the state as the provider. Even the so called right wing states (e.g. Germany and Italy of the 1930ies) where left-wing, with maybe some ideological ideas that pretended otherwise.
As we are now in the fifth generation or so of people relying physically and mentally on a big state, the possibility for a real right wing change seems very remote. -
Everyone in this thread is retarded. I suggest checking out this guy Ray Peat, whose work is founded on materalist principles. you guys are adventurists
-
@Andreas I do not agree. You can have a left-leaning libertarian society and a right-wing socialist society. Nazi germany was fiscally left-wing, but spiritually right-wing. Almost everyone rightly considers facisim to be right-wing.
-
@CO3 Who's Ray Peat? Never heard of that guy.
-
@Andreas the left worships doctors, hospitals, masks, vaccines, and they resent nonfearful rats. they live in a fantasy world and can't think or perceive properly.
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe The problem in that discussion is that the terminology right or left is unclear, and we probably have very different ideas what it means, and we talk past each other.
For me "right" tends to be conservative, family as societal focus , not a big state, economical freedom (capitalism)
The Nazis were the polar opposite to that, as were the Soviets.§Left" is progressive in the sense of destroying the old and ushering in the new, individual or family ar subordinated to the state, the big state, state directed economy (socialism).
This describes the Nazis and the Soviets.The rest is just nuance and aesthetics. The Nazis had snazzy uniforms and did everything with typical German bureaucracy (just as now).
-
@boats This is the modern left. The definition of left now has totally changed, and cannot really be compared to the left of the 1930s.
Today's left are mainly NPCs, who would gladly run with the Nazis or the Communists, whoever is in power. -
@CO3 either that or spooks, it's too insane what they're saying... I guess it's the so called screen damage and meme-mind. Yeah read Ray Peat and talk to anyone irl, you will be cured. If you're spooks let me say "you won't be sparred by the rulers you're helping".
-
@Andreas sure but that's the left we live with now. if they're scared off by peat that's a bonus. if in their minds, peating is a nazi antivax conspiracy diet, that's awesome, funny even. They can go eat their impossible burgers and worship their therapists. Pump themselves full of estrogen, lol ok have fun.
-
@boats Yes, they will die out via natural selection. Or more probably, there kids will rebel against them.
-
What yall are referring to as a typical leftists is a mirage. It's a caricature from a meme. Like the analysis never went past some random right wing click bait and there wasn't even enough effort to read a Wikipedia page (the bare minimum).
The west is not left. The west is right wing. The crisis of the west is the crisis of capitalism. The overtone window has gone so far right that folks think someone is left wing if they drink Starbucks and don't hate gay people. Basic social services is not left-wing, its guillotine insurance. There was no left wing economics in nazi germany, there was no democratization of the workplace, the ruling class still owned the means of production. Capitalism is the dictatorship of the rich and fascism is capitalism with the gloves off.
The right wing won in the west. There is a reason crushing left wing movements was priority #1 for military-industrial complex. The far right should be dancing, yall got yr utopia. This is it.
"People need to start understanding that the system is systematically murdering them, and understanding that the situation is desperate, they need to see that solidarity with life, against capital, is their hope." RP
-
@Aryan_Racist Ray Peat radicalized many people during COVID Pandemic in a way that literally transcends the antiquated left-right political spectrum. The global geopolitical situation in the 21st century is obviously not the same as it was in the early 20th century, and hence the terms as they used to be applied are not at all relevant.
The situation now is largely about the 'wise' implementation of technology, who should control it, who decides what will be researched, to what ends will it be put, and what are the criteria that will be used in deciding all of the above. The globe is now slowly moving away from an 'open society' dominated by a monopoly of Gates-Soros invested enterprises towards inter-regional, nationalist BRICS+ type of initiatives. This impacts Peat's work because it involves a diversity of "scientific perspectives", if you will, coming from different languages, ideologies, cultures and even spiritual backgrounds which participate with greater influence internationally than when they were impoverished colonies (whatever opinion you may have about that).
-
The far right section of RP world consists entirely of Charlie's idiot friends/sockpuppet accounts. So basically just one guy.
-
@buckminster Wise words... We are living in neoliberal or even techno-feudal times...
It may be that people think that the West is "left" because of the current Woke influence...
-
I don’t believe saying the original Rap Peat Forum attracting people on the right is fully correct. I believe it more accurate to say it attracts people who are anti-establishment. Ray Peat’s writings display a clear disdain for the medical establishment and provides for the reader an alternative to what it means to be healthy. Anyone who then believes that the current political/medical/social institutions are bad will be attracted to that, and thus it draws them in.
I disagree that healthy people veer to the right. The meme of a liberal being weak, beta, and a snowflake while the conservative is this strong macho character is a fantasy that lives in peoples heads. If we take a look at the average person who ascribes to either side of the political isle, we are probably going to see an obese diabetic, given the typical profile of your average American.
I do believe however that veganism does attract many people from the left, in that people in the left tend to think more so about the suffering of lower class, oppressed, disabled, weak, etc… and since our domestic animals could be considered in that category, many vegans will be leftist. Conservatives tend to take a more libertarian, might makes right view of things, so they will care very little for the fact that we breed, keep, and cull animals for food.
Consuming animals is very important for optimal health, and so a way of eating that promotes eating animals will be rejected by those on the left who are also vegan, and a bioenergétics way of eating will not attract those people.
Anti-establishment can be either a left or right wing trait, right? For instance, leftist anti-establishment person will veer towards anarch, and, a right anti-establishment will veer towards strong libertarianism.
Ultimately, I do feel as if the truly “healthy” person understands that their conditions for good health is inescapably tied with the environment and society around them, and thus will not seek to destroy or isolate themselves from it, but sustain, nourish, and improve it.
-
@Runenight201 I agree with the first paragraph.
@Runenight201 said in Why is the Ray Peat community so far right?:
If we take a look at the average person who ascribes to either side of the political isle, we are probably going to see an obese diabetic, given the typical profile of your average American.
Yes, but this is an answer to the wrong question. The right question is "are healthy people predominantly right-wing?" and not "are unhealthy people on both sides?". To this we can suggest that healthy people tend to be right wing as testosterone therapy cause red shift in liberal men; and weightlifting and self-improvement, nowadays, is usually associated with right wing. So, it is pretty safe to say that healthy people are generally not left wing (either right or center).
The meme about beta males being left wing has a lot of truth in it, and your example of diabetic on either side of political spectrum does not contradict that.
@Runenight201 said in Why is the Ray Peat community so far right?:
Anti-establishment can be either a left or right wing trait, right?
Technically, yes, that is why "the old" left had a lot of strong anti-establishment views, but the general movement is now more occupied with gender, equality, etc. which is inherently pro-establishment. So, the answer is: mainstream left, no; niche left, yes.
One could say that the old left has waned from public view because it fulfilled its purpose of rebellion against racism, etc. and now moved to rebel against new topics like gender, as Uncle Ted has talked about. And so, the change is a natural progression rather than a political hijacking or neutering, as the leftist continue to "rebel".
If we consider left wing as anti-hierarchical and right wing as pro-hierarchical then Peatism can be appealing to both although inherently anti-hierarchical and thus left wing.
-
I don’t think you can look at testosterone levels and then draw conclusions about overall health status from that. It’s a factor of health certainly, but there are many other things that factor into good health. Is the steroid blasting body builder healthy?
To properly assess this claim, of whether healthy people are predominately conservative, we’d have to agree on all the biomarkers of what it means to be healthy, and then take a statistical representative random sample from both sides of the political isle and run an analysis.
Anything short of that is pure speculation imo.
-
@Runenight201 Ok, if so then, what you said before:
@Runenight201 said in Why is the Ray Peat community so far right?:
I disagree that healthy people veer to the right. The meme of a liberal being weak, beta, and a snowflake while the conservative is this strong macho character is a fantasy that lives in peoples heads.
is also a pure speculation.
I think that it is stupid to expected unbiased statistically-representative double blind peer reviewed studies for everything and it's clear to anyone caring to look that left wingers, nowadays, tend to be effeminate and women tend to be fat, ugly and drinking too much soy which definitely does not fit under the umbrella of "healthy" however you would like to define it.
-
I can understand the frustration with needing studies to confirm everything, but it is far too easy to paint broad stroke generalizations based on biases of what we want to believe rather than an accurate reflection of reality. No one is free from bias, and science is the tool through which we can get objective answers to things.
My characterization of left/right is based on empirical fact of the percentage of obese and diabetic people in the United States, so I don’t believe it to be speculation.
-
@Runenight201 said in Why is the Ray Peat community so far right?:
My characterization of left/right is based on empirical fact of the percentage of obese and diabetic people in the United States, so I don’t believe it to be speculation.
No, it is not. You said that you "disagree that healthy people veer to the right" which is a claim about the healthy people group. Your point about the percentage of obese and diabetic people in the United States is about an average right or left winger:
@Runenight201 said in Why is the Ray Peat community so far right?:
If we take a look at the average person who ascribes to either side of the political isle, we are probably going to see an obese diabetic, given the typical profile of your average American.
Your claim is about an average person, mine about the distribution of the groups. The former does not imply the latter. My claim is that only considering healthy people of either political side, on average, more of them are right wing. And vice versa, considering just unhealthy people, on average, more of them are left wing. Still, both groups can be distributed with mean at the average american diabetic.
So, according to your terms both our claims are just "speculation", although mine is better because its logical and validated by your observations of vegans being leftist and rightist being more individualistic.
