@peater Try shrimp, oysters, and scallops. I like those better than red meat

@hwisdom The miswak I tried had a gross chemical smell to it. Have you found one that seems natural?

@insufferable Nice!

Love your testosterone charts btw.

@insufferable said in Metabolism: sloth to a dopaminergic child:

I have a Dasung Paperlike. It pretty much looks like old time black and white newspapers I guess. 99% of the time I feel no desire to turn on my LCD monitor.

Can you watch videos on it?

What kind of thermometer do you use? I'd like to start tracking temps too.

My guess is that you're running out of glycogen by morning. I think that would decrease your temps, until you get enough sugar to burn. Have you tried consuming simple sugars closer to bed? How is your sleep?

Not worth it, look for a different car

I can get close to no starch by drinking pineapple juice and lots of coke. I get the organic pineapple from lakewood organics. I do eat croissants and cookies every so often though.

@brad Can you edit posts?

@jwayne said in Ray Peat's Age Of Death:

https://u.demog.berkeley.edu/~andrew/1918/figure2.html

These life expectancies look like they address the issue that @haidut_retard was worried about, since more recent years would have comically low life expectancies if they were averages of everyone who had died, as opposed to some sort of forecast.

@jwayne said in Ray Peat's Age Of Death:

https://www.ssa.gov/oact/TR/2012/lr5a3.html

I think the "At age 65" column here is the most informative piece to look at. It removes the downward bias of infant mortality, early deaths from infection, etc. You can see that the the average additional years lived after 65 for men increases slowly over time. The typical 65 yr old from 1940 would live till about 77. So Peat certainly lived longer than the average man from his generation, by quite a bit. If we add legitimate under 65 (i.e. fatal heart attack at 50, stroke at 60, etc.) it would be even more apparent.