Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.

  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Register
  • Login
Bioenergetic Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Register
  • Login

Ray Peat - quack or genius?

Bioenergetics Discussion
14
38
2.2k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F
    Fructose @newmexico
    last edited by Jan 30, 2024, 12:07 AM

    @newmexico said in Ray Peat - quack or genius?:

    @Fructose that is probably due to a poor diet and genetics/genetic mutation in the family, unfortunately. I was fine when I ate normal NHS-approved food, but when I tried the RPD it destroyed me quite badly (previously mentioned)

    Me the same. Simply "Perceive, Think, Act".

    I don't have a typical Peat diet myself, I'm experimenting. I observe my body and its reaction. I am currently on a low-fat liquid diet.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • N
      newmexico @Fructose
      last edited by Jan 30, 2024, 12:14 AM

      @Fructose When I ate a diet by the best guidelines it actually made me feel great! I was a longdistance runner and got high positions in marathons, even winning some. I eat salads on the regular and was never deficient! I had my bloodwork done by my doc he told me I was in the 94th percentile of men my age!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        chudlord @newmexico
        last edited by Jan 30, 2024, 9:52 AM

        @newmexico it seems to me like you haven’t read any article of Ray nor have read any of the studies he cited and referenced

        “Resuscitating the cloromydorphins to add a pep into your step”

        -Rizzenhouse

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          paradox
          last edited by Jan 30, 2024, 10:07 AM

          It's not about the empiricism, it's his methodological philosophy. In that, I believe he was being clear that the uniqueness of an individual must be taken into account instead of relying on aggregate research with questionable controls.

          K 1 Reply Last reply Jan 30, 2024, 1:08 PM Reply Quote 0
          • K
            Kvirion @paradox
            last edited by Kvirion Jan 30, 2024, 1:09 PM Jan 30, 2024, 1:08 PM

            @paradox Well said, Ray was all about the good method and understanding the individual context.

            @chudlord Exacly, to understand Ray, one must read most of his articles thoroughly. Moreover, to understand his philosophical approaches based on for example Heraclitus or William Blake 🙂

            @newmexico Something for you Youtube Video

            A little learning is a dangerous thing ;
            Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring :
            There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
            And drinking largely sobers us again.
            ~Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              toiletking @newmexico
              last edited by Jan 30, 2024, 2:09 PM

              @newmexico you can try everything he suggested and see for yourself.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                TexugoDoMel
                last edited by Feb 1, 2024, 2:07 AM

                Just a reminder for those who are interested, since I think this person is joking

                7a93a5e0-2e71-43b3-a93b-dae8fc6d6a43-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  brad
                  last edited by brad Feb 1, 2024, 4:04 AM Feb 1, 2024, 3:50 AM

                  I find that most people who dismiss Ray out of hand based on socially conditioned "scientific" consensus rely upon un-empirical heuristics such as "posts are not peer-reviewed and are outdated." That notwithstanding, reading this post style sounds an awfully lot like ChatGPT3.5. That could either be because the author couldn't generate their own arguments or because their ideas are so clichéd that they closely resemble statistically "average" sentences.

                  K 1 Reply Last reply Feb 2, 2024, 10:42 AM Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    Kvirion @brad
                    last edited by Feb 2, 2024, 10:42 AM

                    @brad Yep, Unfortunately, most normies are conditioned to be afraid/avoid everything outside the mainstream's narrow Overton Window...

                    Some say that people can even have a mental immune system for that https://www.prosocial.world/posts/bad-ideas-recruit-the-minds-immune-system-to-protect-themselves

                    A little learning is a dangerous thing ;
                    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring :
                    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
                    And drinking largely sobers us again.
                    ~Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V
                      VirtueAgonist
                      last edited by Feb 2, 2024, 10:57 AM

                      Read the Milk Manifesto

                      Regenerative milk is more environmentally friendly than vegetable harvests.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • 1
                      • 2
                      • 2 / 2
                      2 / 2
                      • First post
                        38/38
                        Last post