New "Mission" of RPF
-
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
Alright everyone, some wag beat me to my RPF username. I am in the A-curious camp but it's unequivocally not up for discussion...so there we go.
-
@Verdad said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Make no mistake Charlie is heading in the direction of banning everyone who even suggests that Vitamin A is not a toxin.
Well called. Just 12 hours later it happened.
-
@TheSir Hi, he potentially wants to do the same thing about vitamin D supplementation, potentially he doesn't only because he's afraid of the potential consequences if he bans Georgi "haidut"
-
If I was close to Katherine
Say a Danny Roddy closeness
I would like to see if she is aware of this connection to his nameThis feels not only unwell
Not only dirty
But possibly illegalMy FIL is a lawyer
Not his specialty
But I think I’d like to see what he thinksGrieving with you all….
-
@Peatful
Is Danny aware of the degeneration of RPF? He had an account there but wasn't active. I don't use any social media and don't know how to contact him.Maybe he could talk to Katherine about it. It's an utter disgrace that his name is being dragged through the mud with that forum named after him. I can't imagine that his widow is pleased by that.
-
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/the-official-state-of-the-forum-address-unprecedented-strength-and-unwavering-vision.52617/post-985247This is all so wild. I'd say I can scarcely believe my own eyes, but I can. This is the depth now. The Mariana Trench of "leadership".
-
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,
Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs
Charlie who potentially tries to act and make people believe that he shares Raymond Peat's ideas with some "Ray peat right again" label to potentially try to damage control his previous post on pro vitamin A studies not being allowed
-
@Truth I knew he was eventually going there. Cults and dogmatics always end at this point. They know they cannot fully defend their position so they just shut it down.
The RPF is officially dead @Charlie you are an absolute disgrace! I can't believe i supported you all these years and gave you money. No doubt the forum will now collapse into oblivion as everyone is essentially walking on eggshells afraid of getting banned. Free discussions of ideas are now gone.
I see he still has the motto "perceive, think, act" on the head of the website what hilarious irony.
-
Yes
CorrectThe Ray Peat Right Again triteness was a CYA move imo
Thx for the updates
-
@Verdad said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Truth I knew he was eventually going there. Cults and dogmatics always end at this point. They know they cannot fully defend their position so they just shut it down.
The RPF is officially dead @Charlie you are an absolute disgrace! I can't believe i supported you all these years and gave you money. No doubt the forum will now collapse into oblivion as everyone is essentially walking on eggshells afraid of getting banned. Free discussions of ideas are now gone.
I see he still has the motto "perceive, think, act" on the head of the website what hilarious irony.
Instead of "perceive, think, act," it's more like "observe, follow, obey."
-
@Verdad said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I see he still has the motto "perceive, think, act" on the head of the website what hilarious irony.
George Orwell would be proud.
-
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,
Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs
Charlie who is potentially trying to make people believe that Raymond Peat's perspective on receptors implies that if there are no receptors for a certain element/nutrient, then that element is not essential, Raymond absolutely never said that(from what i have Seen), Raymond said that even without receptors various elements/nutrients have positive effects
-
@Truth I hope I'm wrong but I think there is nothing that will change his mind. By the way before long it will be you can no longer post positive posts about Vitamin D, Calcium, Dairy etc. Everyone will be walking on eggshells afraid of getting banned and no one fully knows what the rules are so people will just stop contributing. It's complete forum suicide.
-
@S-Holmes I don't even glance at that forum any more, slowly working my way through https://wiki.chadnet.org/ray-peat
Should Charlie see this, unlikely, I'll just leave this;
A mind is like a parachute it only works when it is open. -
@Verdad the forum is dead, he will potentially change the name
-
@Luke said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Peatful
Is Danny aware of the degeneration of RPF? He had an account there but wasn't active. I don't use any social media and don't know how to contact him.Maybe he could talk to Katherine about it. It's an utter disgrace that his name is being dragged through the mud with that forum named after him. I can't imagine that his widow is pleased by that.
He's certainly aware, but I'm not sure if anything can be done about it.
-
@Truth I think that he likely will change the name to I don't know, "the great awakening forum" or some other equally cult like nonsense. I just hope he doesn't purge all the great info there is on there. He is in full paranoia mode from what I've read. He thinks everyone is about to attack him and bring him down. These are all symptoms of biological stress.
-
Spoke with my FIL briefly
Yes
This is why they have Copyright, Trademark and Patent specialty lawyersFrom what I understand from my conversation
Charlie is breaking the law under a copyright law
He needs to either change the forum name-
Or
Take down all of Ray’s articles and newslettersIf Ray was incorporated
That would also be a second offenseI honestly wish Charlie the best
He really has himself in a bad positionHealth to all….
-
@Peatful what are the specific laws being broken? Do they have to do with misrepresenting someone's views, or something else?
-
@TheSir hey, I’m at work, and this is voice recognition. My father-in-law said a lot, but it’s lawyer speak. Something I’m not well-versed in.
I’m a big idea person not a detail person but I am sure a simple Google search would be able to clarify or define what you’re asking.
