Race and IQ
-
@NiggerBasher
-
Ray's critique of genetics is a central thesis of his work. So much of his ideas are downstream of that conclusion. I'm not sure how folks who disagree can honestly read his work and not get a brain aneurism. The cognitive dissonance must gnaw from your insides.
-
@buckminster I just want to eat ice cream and drink coffee.
-
@buckminster The cognitive dissonance is RAMPANT because I claim that Bushmen and Aboriginals don't have the phenotypical mental capacity to allow for three-dimensional spacial reasoning and foresight into the future.
-
If you have such disparate views from Dr. Peat why pretend you like his work? He's an anti-nazi who made it his life work to expose genetics as a racist psuedo-science. Yall are literally in the polar opposite school of thought.
-
I believe there are distinct differences in current general intellect between races, both on a qualitative and quantitative level. However, it may be possible to raise intelligence to reduce the differential between races. Whether it's worth doing so on a wide scale is unclear yet.
-
@Sugar Water is wet
-
Environmental temperature is inversely correlated with IQ, so makes sense that places like Africa is lower IQ. But even when all factors are controlled blacks still have lower IQ, indicating that they indeed are genetically predisposed to lower IQ. But obviously there are people who are outliers.
-
@buckminster if we feed amoebas milk and aspirin, they will create advanced civilization?
-
@buckminster Ray Peats views are completely compatible with racial science. Why is racial science psuedo-science again? Because you don't like the conclusions?
-
@gugenmungus for your own sake you should hope so
-
The only conclusion I can make from such grotesque comments is that you don't give a fuck about the work of dr. peat, and are only hear to destroy it and tarnish his name. Possibly paid for by big pharma as a cointelpro style operation, or just a deranged sociopath with nothing better to do than fling shit and destroy beauty.
-
@buckminster I was paid millions of dollars by big pharma to make racist comments on bioenergetic.forum
-
@gugenmungus
"John Ioannidis’ article 'Why most research findings are false' is worth reading. Things discussed on 'forums' aren’t. Ordinary corporate advertising has been supplemented by the much more economical practice of hiring product reviewers to slander competing products, joining multiple forums with their 'unhappy experiences.'" RP (2021) -
claim racial differences are real
"ERM YOU ARE ANTI-PEAT AND PAID BY BIG PHARMA, YOU ARE AN AGENT"
You still haven't told me why it's wrong. It's not incompatible with Ray Peat's work. You have just called me a sociopath to try and evade the claims.
-
I'm not sure how you can't pick up by context that I was obviously talking to the person typing vulgar obscenities at me.
-
I believe IQ changes depending on the race, and i also think the complexity of the your mother tongue will have crucial effects on the development of your IQ.
-
@buckminster point still stands, I would like to know why its incompatible with Ray Peats work.
-
Wait, you literally don't realize racist genetics is incompatible with peat's work? Have you read the work of Dr. Peat? Did you find your way here from memes? I shouldn't have to explain it to you. Read 'Mind and Tissue' and 'Adaptive substance, creative regeneration: Mainstream science, repression, and creativity'
-
@buckminster I've read plenty of his work. I've read his takes on IQ. His work is compatible with the claim that race is a real and valid concept.
Please, explain to me why this is not the case so I can better understand his work.