New "Mission" of RPF
-
@C-Mex they probably can scan the user content and their automated system is pulling that address and assuming it’s related to the forum’s ownership due to the link between the forum’s content type and that address.
Don’t get me wrong I do think there is some kind of conspiracy going on here but I think that connection to Cambridge is tenuous at best.
-
I agree that it needs more looking into, but it is just too much of a coincidence, and it would explain the absolutely bizarre circumstances surrounding the RPF. However, I am doubtful that it would pick up one address from the user content and ascribe that to the address for the forum. Why wouldn't it pick up the Life Giving Store address or any other address that might be contained in the content if it were looking there? Ray Peat's PO box address is in there. My understanding it that the algorithms search business records and possibly business-associated e-mail addresses among other data, but not user content.
-
@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
it would explain the absolutely bizarre circumstances surrounding the RPF
No, it would explain nothing. Why would a supposed malicious actor use address of pharmacology dept.? I know that you posted loads of supposed connections to the place but the person who would be setting up the honeypot would not be working in pharmacology dept. and, if as you insinuated he would be a state funded actor, he would know better than to use real address connected to him. Most likely he would make sure that any address used for registration is private, for example by using cloudflare... just like "Charlie" did which is why you have to resort to terrible services like Zoominfo.
To summarize, you are implying that the malevolent actor is at the same time connected to the best founded organizations (or government 3-letter agencies) with long tract record of censorship etc and at the same time he is completely incompetent to a point where Zoominfo can find out his true address.
@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
My understanding it that the algorithms search business records and possibly business-associated e-mail addresses among other data, but not user content.
Your understanding is incorrect as I said before. If only you would have cared to read the article I sent, you would know that it compiles data in two ways:
- Scraping the web for company and contact information through their proprietary web crawler called NextGenSearchBot.
- Through email plugins that collect email signature information such as name, title, company, phone numbers and email addresses.
"Scraping the web" means that they are scraping everything in the forum including user content.
-
Looks like Gates Cambridge is very interested in "prebunking". Too bad they couldn't 'prebunk' the discovery of that UK address, lol.
-
Looks like they are trying to convince the public that it is a good thing. I don't watch MSM anymore so I missed this:
-
@Peatly said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I read this article about the Wellcome when it was first published in 2021 - worth reading again
A “Leap” toward Humanity’s Destruction
Very disturbing.
-
@C-Mex
-
@Peatly
Yeah, I remember that article. That was when I trusted (some) Whitney Webb. Anyhow, it is basically ALL to do with Control: of people's thoughts, potential movements, and of course plate/argent/money spending. Think 'Malthusian', the oldworld becomes the WELLCOME TRUST LEAP = WorldWide DARPA. "Fingerprinting" w Digi/ ID is about as trustworthy as arming your enemies. How much 'Trust' do you have in the Government? Not only USA, but France, Argentina, UK, Japan, etc. . When money is not anonymous, and your internet searches become classified as 'not productive' for the goals of the State, where you gonna run to then?I do agree with the sentiment that Charlie is basically a tool for the disinfo. Think need to know basis. Therefore one of the other 'more famous' personalities is advising him. l don't know much about the technical server side. Just check the tax info of the biz if possible, that is always a good angle. (From the movies I hear).
-
@Peatly said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Charlie owns lifegivingstore which is not registered under the name Charles Mathers
Charlie acknowledges here that "Debra" runs Life Giving Store which matches the female name in the LLC registration data for both companies mentioned previously.
Charlie says Debra is "part of my family"
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/cholesterol-powder-steroid-hormone-precursor-available-for-lab-research-use.19436/Where is the thread where Charlie says he owns Life Giving Store? All I see is these 2017-2019 posts where he "pretends" to be a customer praising their products in the forum threads.
-
This post is deleted! -
@ilovethesea What's very, very odd is that the attachment in the "Carbon Dioxide, Glycation" thread by user "frustrated" was added by edit years later. Because the attachment is date stamped October 15, 2014 and the comment in the thread is Feb 14 2013.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/organic-whole-bean-coffee-suggestions-and-grinder.1090/
Also, the comment in the "Organic Whole Bean Coffee" thread was also edited later by user "sctb" because his comment was even earlier on Jan 13, 2013 and the attachment is dated August 16 2014. Why go and add this "doxxing" image 1+ year later to different threads by different users?
-
@jwayne said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@ilovethesea What's very, very odd is that the attachment in the "Carbon Dioxide, Glycation" thread by user "frustrated" was added by edit years later. Because the attachment is date stamped August 16 2014 and the comment in the thread is Feb 14 2013. Also, the comment in the "Organic Whole Bean Coffee" thread (which seems to be the original) was also edited later by user "sctb" because his comment was even earlier on Jan 13, 2013. But at least the context matches as the image appears to be coffee related. But why go and add this "doxxing" image 1+ year later to different threads by different users?
The same attachment of the box with Charlie Mathers on the shipping label was also posted by "Charlie" himself! This time with no context whatsoever. And the date is totally wrong again with the comment appearing Feb 23, 2013. The attachment is date-stamped November 17, 2014 in that one.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/progesterone.227/page-7
The same image appears out of context everywhere in different threads of a box from Thailand by "PimPomProduct.com" (lots of references to PimPom on the forum) addressed the Charlie Mathers on the receipt.
Thyroid order- Posted by "Charlie" https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/matt-stone-on-peat.893/page-2
By user "Beebop", no context https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/robert-lustig-on-bbc-radio-4-pm.1358/
By user "jaguar43", no context https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/ray-peat-diet-two-weeks-in-signs-not-good.1308/
-
@jwayne The only person who would have an unboxxing photo would be the receiver after getting the package. But how did these come to be uploaded to the forum? I don't know why you would photograph all of them to begin with. It looks like some kind of mistake that these were posted but I don't know how that would happen except by a moderator. And he has no reason to do that.
-
This is worth a listen for the first eighteen minutes or so (toward the end it jumps to something else), I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons). It's huge motivation to do what some of us suspect they have done with the RPF and for the phony theories being propagated. He's written well-cited books covering these subjects if you require further reference.
https://x.com/BryceMLipscomb/status/1776324251848458379
-
@C-Mex
The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.
P.s. I'm sorry about some on this island. To be continued.
-
That's horrible, why would they change something that already works???
-
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@C-Mex
The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.
Not the same topic though.
-
@C-Mex
It absolutely is the same topic C-Mex. But you're absolutely entitled to conclude I have the wrong end of the stick.
"I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons)"
All of it is done under corporate labels. Which is why you can't touch any of the humans beings responsible for it.
-
It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.
-
@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.
Keep your alans on C-Mex (that's London humour). I offered the fundamental part of the pitch from the person you brought in to the thread. He's right.
Just have a think about how you intend to change those things. If you propose to lobby representatives to legislate. Does it not stand to reason that existing legislation should be examined in the process. What exactly is it that makes a man untouchable. And how can they learn when they are so.
A talking head on Twitter or YouTube is unlikely to be popular in attempt to point this out.
