Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.

    Bioenergetic Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    New "Mission" of RPF

    Bioenergetics Discussion
    118
    1.8k
    321.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User @bot-mod
      last edited by

      @ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:

      @C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

      d7a124a9-0e1e-435e-abc0-6d17c398a9e0-image.png

      Sorry I can't help myself. I'm only here to vomit a bit of technically minded rationality. We're all on a road, I'm authentically liberal and democratic. I don't want to derail or stop a discussion.

      His statement about fingerprinting there is fair. It's practically an art and no one should be under any illusion. The internet is not and has never been an anonymous environment. Only one where identity can be obfuscated and misattributed. But depending on severity that too can be unwound. Where there's a will there's a way. The only question that matters is whether it would stand up in court. I'm a law abiding citizen, so this is just an intellectual exercise for me.

      The method in the article below peaks my nerd for using execution characteristics beneath the abstractions we're used to. And it's by no means the only way.

      https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02/now-sites-can-fingerprint-you-online-even-when-you-use-multiple-browsers/

      I also have two words: Corporate Personhood.

      If the inhabitants of a "progressive" form of civilisation want to have their cake and eat it. We probably will have digital ID. And it will be the responsibility of the population to keep the implications of that in check. At all times.

      The more we can understand how we arrived here and keep a cool head about it. The less likely things will be done in the midst of "crisis".

      In many ways a "surveillance state" exists to deal with psychological aberrations that can arise from misunderstanding complexity. I'm not sympathising, it's just True. So help me God.

      I think you are rationalizating abuse and potential government overreach of the technology. Of course I know that capabilities are there and have been there for some time, but many people don't. Until people start calling out the misuse of surveillance and tracking capabilities and bringing attention to the issue we will continue to see more infringements on our liberties.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        saturnuscv @zawisza
        last edited by

        @zawisza said in New "Mission" of RPF:

        @ilovethesea said in New "Mission" of RPF:

        Looks like @zawisza may be on their payroll.

        Of all the addresses in the world for ZoomInfo to get wrong, it somehow links Ray Peat Forum supposedly founded by a guy in Florida to Cambridge University Pharmacology, Wellcome Trust and the World Health Organization?

        Sure Jan.

        @C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

        They scanned some data that linked it to that address in Cambridge, UK. The complaint is about getting one address wrong, 400 miles away.

        If you had some desire to actually understand what's going on instead of jumping on the bandwagon and piling as much shit as possible on a guy you hate, you would maybe have easier time understanding this. ICANN has redacted organization's address for privacy since they used cloudflare for hosting so there's no way of actually knowing the true addrss. Zoominfo can only "guess" their address by maliciously scanning users' emails and scraping the web. It's enough for the address to be mentioned on the website; it doesn't have to be associated actually with the website (just like in the article I sent). If you had read the article I posted you would know how wrong they can be, how they refuse to change, and that it's not just one address as you try to imply.

        Knowing how zoominfo works, we should expected the Cambridge address to be present somewhere in the forum. And it is:
        IP3 Receptors: Toward Understanding Their Activation
        Colin W. Taylor and Stephen C. Tovey
        Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1PD, United Kingdom
        Correspondence:Email: ku.ca.mac@0001twc
        2010

        Zoominfo found this address and assigned it to the website even though it's completely unrelated. Other "services" showing website info probably copied this from zoominfo since most of them scrape each other.

        Everyone is getting caught up in the minutiae of this post’s tone or whatever, but he’s basically proved that the Cambridge connection is a “glitch” in zoominfo

        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          Peatly @A Former User
          last edited by

          @C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

          @Peatly said in New "Mission" of RPF:

          No surprise there. This is serious.

          Also the Wellcome trust is based on Tennis Court Road in Cambridge

          What a coincidence.

          https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2015/03/opp1128295

          243fabea-975f-4c18-a074-a8d454a4101d-image.png

          I read this article about the Wellcome when it was first published in 2021 - worth reading again

          A “Leap” toward Humanity’s Destruction

          A successful depopulation agenda requires high excess death rates, lower birth rates and for the majority to vilify those that question it.

          ? A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            Peatly
            last edited by

            Charlie owns lifegivingstore which is not registered under the name Charles Mathers

            A successful depopulation agenda requires high excess death rates, lower birth rates and for the majority to vilify those that question it.

            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User @saturnuscv
              last edited by A Former User

              @saturnuscv

              So you are saying that one citation within one post with that address prompted Zoominfo to presume that to be address of the RPF? Doesn't seem likely to me. It clearly states The Deparment of Phamacology before that address, and I don't think they scan the acutal user content of forums for that kind of information.

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                saturnuscv @A Former User
                last edited by

                @C-Mex they probably can scan the user content and their automated system is pulling that address and assuming it’s related to the forum’s ownership due to the link between the forum’s content type and that address.

                Don’t get me wrong I do think there is some kind of conspiracy going on here but I think that connection to Cambridge is tenuous at best.

                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @saturnuscv
                  last edited by

                  @saturnuscv

                  I agree that it needs more looking into, but it is just too much of a coincidence, and it would explain the absolutely bizarre circumstances surrounding the RPF. However, I am doubtful that it would pick up one address from the user content and ascribe that to the address for the forum. Why wouldn't it pick up the Life Giving Store address or any other address that might be contained in the content if it were looking there? Ray Peat's PO box address is in there. My understanding it that the algorithms search business records and possibly business-associated e-mail addresses among other data, but not user content.

                  Z S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Z
                    zawisza @A Former User
                    last edited by

                    @C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                    it would explain the absolutely bizarre circumstances surrounding the RPF

                    No, it would explain nothing. Why would a supposed malicious actor use address of pharmacology dept.? I know that you posted loads of supposed connections to the place but the person who would be setting up the honeypot would not be working in pharmacology dept. and, if as you insinuated he would be a state funded actor, he would know better than to use real address connected to him. Most likely he would make sure that any address used for registration is private, for example by using cloudflare... just like "Charlie" did which is why you have to resort to terrible services like Zoominfo.

                    To summarize, you are implying that the malevolent actor is at the same time connected to the best founded organizations (or government 3-letter agencies) with long tract record of censorship etc and at the same time he is completely incompetent to a point where Zoominfo can find out his true address.

                    @C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                    My understanding it that the algorithms search business records and possibly business-associated e-mail addresses among other data, but not user content.

                    Your understanding is incorrect as I said before. If only you would have cared to read the article I sent, you would know that it compiles data in two ways:

                    • Scraping the web for company and contact information through their proprietary web crawler called NextGenSearchBot.
                    • Through email plugins that collect email signature information such as name, title, company, phone numbers and email addresses.

                    "Scraping the web" means that they are scraping everything in the forum including user content.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      A Former User
                      last edited by

                      Looks like Gates Cambridge is very interested in "prebunking". Too bad they couldn't 'prebunk' the discovery of that UK address, lol.

                      78cf7aa9-68b8-4457-91d7-9c3e137cbe0b-image.png

                      a4347d32-56a2-431d-b379-ba3012ee1e3b-image.png

                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User @A Former User
                        last edited by

                        Looks like they are trying to convince the public that it is a good thing. I don't watch MSM anymore so I missed this:

                        2e6cdb2e-7094-4ff5-93db-2a977f19b2bc-image.png

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User @Peatly
                          last edited by

                          @Peatly said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                          I read this article about the Wellcome when it was first published in 2021 - worth reading again

                          A “Leap” toward Humanity’s Destruction

                          Very disturbing.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            saturnuscv @A Former User
                            last edited by saturnuscv

                            @C-Mex 🤦

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              AkJono @Peatly
                              last edited by

                              @Peatly
                              Yeah, I remember that article. That was when I trusted (some) Whitney Webb. Anyhow, it is basically ALL to do with Control: of people's thoughts, potential movements, and of course plate/argent/money spending. Think 'Malthusian', the oldworld becomes the WELLCOME TRUST LEAP = WorldWide DARPA. "Fingerprinting" w Digi/ ID is about as trustworthy as arming your enemies. How much 'Trust' do you have in the Government? Not only USA, but France, Argentina, UK, Japan, etc. . When money is not anonymous, and your internet searches become classified as 'not productive' for the goals of the State, where you gonna run to then?

                              I do agree with the sentiment that Charlie is basically a tool for the disinfo. Think need to know basis. Therefore one of the other 'more famous' personalities is advising him. l don't know much about the technical server side. Just check the tax info of the biz if possible, that is always a good angle. (From the movies I hear).

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User @Peatly
                                last edited by A Former User

                                @Peatly said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                                Charlie owns lifegivingstore which is not registered under the name Charles Mathers

                                Charlie acknowledges here that "Debra" runs Life Giving Store which matches the female name in the LLC registration data for both companies mentioned previously.

                                https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/lgs1-orange-red-light-therapy-handheld-device-610nm-630nm-670nm.20659/

                                https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/cascara-sagrada-powder-ray-peat-recommended-cascara-from-farmalabor-in-italy.20311/page-2

                                Charlie says Debra is "part of my family"
                                https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/cholesterol-powder-steroid-hormone-precursor-available-for-lab-research-use.19436/

                                Where is the thread where Charlie says he owns Life Giving Store? All I see is these 2017-2019 posts where he "pretends" to be a customer praising their products in the forum threads.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User @ilovethesea
                                  last edited by

                                  This post is deleted!
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User @ilovethesea
                                    last edited by A Former User

                                    @ilovethesea What's very, very odd is that the attachment in the "Carbon Dioxide, Glycation" thread by user "frustrated" was added by edit years later. Because the attachment is date stamped October 15, 2014 and the comment in the thread is Feb 14 2013.

                                    https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/organic-whole-bean-coffee-suggestions-and-grinder.1090/

                                    Also, the comment in the "Organic Whole Bean Coffee" thread was also edited later by user "sctb" because his comment was even earlier on Jan 13, 2013 and the attachment is dated August 16 2014. Why go and add this "doxxing" image 1+ year later to different threads by different users?

                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User @A Former User
                                      last edited by A Former User

                                      @jwayne said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                                      @ilovethesea What's very, very odd is that the attachment in the "Carbon Dioxide, Glycation" thread by user "frustrated" was added by edit years later. Because the attachment is date stamped August 16 2014 and the comment in the thread is Feb 14 2013. Also, the comment in the "Organic Whole Bean Coffee" thread (which seems to be the original) was also edited later by user "sctb" because his comment was even earlier on Jan 13, 2013. But at least the context matches as the image appears to be coffee related. But why go and add this "doxxing" image 1+ year later to different threads by different users?

                                      The same attachment of the box with Charlie Mathers on the shipping label was also posted by "Charlie" himself! This time with no context whatsoever. And the date is totally wrong again with the comment appearing Feb 23, 2013. The attachment is date-stamped November 17, 2014 in that one.

                                      https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/progesterone.227/page-7

                                      The same image appears out of context everywhere in different threads of a box from Thailand by "PimPomProduct.com" (lots of references to PimPom on the forum) addressed the Charlie Mathers on the receipt.

                                      Thyroid order- Posted by "Charlie" https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/matt-stone-on-peat.893/page-2

                                      By user "Beebop", no context https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/robert-lustig-on-bbc-radio-4-pm.1358/

                                      By user "jaguar43", no context https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/ray-peat-diet-two-weeks-in-signs-not-good.1308/

                                      ? I 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ?
                                        A Former User @A Former User
                                        last edited by A Former User

                                        @jwayne The only person who would have an unboxxing photo would be the receiver after getting the package. But how did these come to be uploaded to the forum? I don't know why you would photograph all of them to begin with. It looks like some kind of mistake that these were posted but I don't know how that would happen except by a moderator. And he has no reason to do that.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ?
                                          A Former User
                                          last edited by A Former User

                                          This is worth a listen for the first eighteen minutes or so (toward the end it jumps to something else), I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons). It's huge motivation to do what some of us suspect they have done with the RPF and for the phony theories being propagated. He's written well-cited books covering these subjects if you require further reference.

                                          https://x.com/BryceMLipscomb/status/1776324251848458379

                                          3550d461-0437-4bc5-a70a-44b8ce4f6638-image.png

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • B
                                            bot-mod @A Former User
                                            last edited by

                                            @C-Mex

                                            The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.

                                            Youtube Video

                                            P.s. I'm sorry about some on this island. To be continued.

                                            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 63
                                            • 64
                                            • 65
                                            • 66
                                            • 67
                                            • 87
                                            • 88
                                            • 65 / 88
                                            • First post
                                              Last post