New "Mission" of RPF
-
@S-Holmes Not the same person. Their writing styles and intelligence levels are totally different.
-
Anyone else?
-
@S-Holmes Agree with Light. Mosaic01 has written posts Charlie couldn't write even with the help of an AI.
-
@TheSir I'm hoping others who were in the discussion about this a few days ago will also chime in. If this isn't Mr LK I stand corrected.
-
i donät believe it's him, there are several incongruent points in post history if you look back far enough.
i joked in another thread that at this rate that board is going to be admin and his 3-4 alts, and while creating alt accounts years in advance and leaving contradictory information to hide your trail is not outside the scope of anyone with a reasonable level of cognition, it is outside the scope of the admin of that board.
the better question is where these people even came from, suddenly out of nowhere. i was thinking earlier as well, the reason so many people on that board seem utterly incapable of using rays ideas as a framework in which they are highly adaptable is because many of them only discovered peat from that matt stone fella or some other fad blogger. these fellas are doomed to toil hopping from one pole to another looking for the solution, suffice to say anyone providing a holistic framework (ray) will just be distilled to "just tell me how much food and what food to stuff in my stupid mouth".
i will say in terms of being used as an archive, that board is second to none. of course, you have the early posters to thank for the high quality of information, and some have switched over to this board, thankfully. hopefully more soon.
-
@CO3 said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@yerrag Mind your manners, boy!
If only you can stop and think and look at yourself in the mirror once in a while, you would start healing your own tendency to inflate yourself to lofty heights and keep looking down on people whose ideas and experiences do not conform to yours, and you could even be wrong.
Stop to think your own context is not everybody's.
Stop saying your one experience is that of the majority.
Not all are fooled by your pomposity though many would because your air of confidence makes up for your lack of understanding.
With all due respect, your highness!
-
Has this guy always been a complete loon or is there a possibility of outside interference? Perhaps some of the older RPF members who were somewhat closer to the 'lion' would care to speculate. As an outsider, it seems that his behaviour has changed radically in the past months.
-
@skylark said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Has this guy always been a complete loon or is there a possibility of outside interference? Perhaps some of the older RPF members who were somewhat closer to the 'lion' would care to speculate. As an outsider, it seems that his behaviour has changed radically in the past months.
Without judging one way or another I can say until recently it was one of the most stable, constant forums I ever visited.
-
@TheRealPeater said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@skylark said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Has this guy always been a complete loon or is there a possibility of outside interference? Perhaps some of the older RPF members who were somewhat closer to the 'lion' would care to speculate. As an outsider, it seems that his behaviour has changed radically in the past months.
Without judging one way or another I can say until recently it was one of the most stable, constant forums I ever visited.
I second that. Charlie WAS always a good moderator. Something changed drastically.
-
@S-Holmes @TheRealPeater He's been a very bad admin since at least early 2021, banning people without declaring it just because they bring up things Charlie doesn't like or that upset his beliefs, per exemple, banned once for bringing up the report of hundreds of thousands of child abuse within the church, published by the church
Allegedly he told some people he started eating muscle meat and rice 3 years ago
-
a few years ago he was touting the "grape diet" or the "morse diet" claiming it turned all his problems around. said it was "God's diet" (sound familiar?). as i said before: doomed to toil hopping from one pole to another, these people are the concentrated "success" of the cluster who discovered peat through that disgusting pig Matt Stone, whose only interest was finding diet modalities that allow him to eat like a disgusting pig.
i got the impression the board thrived because for the most part the admin and that woman moderator puppet of his were effectively "absentee landlords" for the most part.
member @Truth is correct in that admin has always been a shitty admin, he is just more active now it seems due to euphoria from finding the answer to all his problems once again for the 10th time in the past decade. board was good in spite of the staff, this is very important.
-
I somehow missed all that drama...probably busy with new grandbabies. Lol
-
a woman in one of the low toxin groups (Betsy) just successfully reversed a hysterectomy that was performed in 2002 by using a witches brew of granny smith rinds and black beans (but NOT green beans!!!!).
thank you Dr Smith.
-
@oldchem 🤯
-
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,
Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs
after he was exposed, charlie backtracked his claims and says he now agrees again that people can share pro vitamin A studies on the forum
Thrive for the highest degree of energy
-
@Truth Shame. The forum would look much more like a cult that way, and the traffic would die down quicker. Being reasonable is going to keep sick people showing up to the RPF instead of other, more well-rounded places.
-
The avalanche had already snowballed. Charlie running for his life. And acting now like a gentleman. Praising realneat for being gentlemanly.
While before he wasn't praising the gentlemen whom he banned.
Saving face and acting too late and doing too little.
Realneat- nice try for a purple heart award from charlie!
-
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,
Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs
after he was exposed, charlie backtracked his claims and says he now agrees again that people can share pro vitamin A studies on the forum
When we search for "Ray peat" forum on the search engine, charlie has changed the description to:
"Ray Peat Forum: Interweaving Low-Toxin Lifestyle Approaches, Toxic Bile Theory Insights, and Ray Peat's Research Contributions." (Charlie has claimed recently that Raymond's ideas are mostly toxic and harmfull)
While intentionally linking in second just below the "Ray peat" forum name, the second page of a thread speculating on Raymond Peat's death, absolutely no links to articles, interviews, research or contributions from Raymond Peat. Vicious
Thrive for the highest degree of energy
-
@Truth
This is just so evil to put Ray Peat death thread there, crazy, from a guy with "god".
Like my grandmother said "god is in your heart" "in your behaviour". -
This post is deleted!
