Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.

    Bioenergetic Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    moggy chicken log

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Experimental Logs
    86 Posts 10 Posters 1.7k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • sunsunsunS Offline
      sunsunsun @alfredoolivas
      last edited by

      https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0600457

      found the study referencing the study suggesting tren reduces both muscle synthesis as well as breakdown but reduces breakdown more ∴ it is anabolic to muscle

      also says something about glucocorticoids

      but main part of study says muscle put on with dianabol is different than normal muscle (i think) in that it is more contractile tissue and less water but im lazily reading it rn

      alfredoolivasA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • alfredoolivasA Offline
        alfredoolivas @sunsunsun
        last edited by alfredoolivas

        @sunsunsun Great find sushi

        I think it was reffering to this study

        It used a HED of 70mg a week for an 80kg man, which is a very low dose. They measured protein synthesis by measuring the concentration of RNA in muscle, which usually increases during AAS administration, but fell during trenbolone treatment. The tren rats had less amino acids in their muscle, indicating less muscle breakdown and more nitrogen per kg of bodyweights and normal organ sizes (actually less as a percent of bodyweight) it's interesting. to see its' unique effects

        sunsunsunS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • engineerE Offline
          engineer @alfredoolivas
          last edited by engineer

          unfortunately it looks like if you want to lose fat not super slowly, you need to endure some FAO

          https://substack.com/home/post/p-189515524

          the trick is, though, to limit FAO to short periods like at night or between meals during the day in order to not rely on cortisol and instead just stored glycogen and fat

          this seems to be working for me super well

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • alfredoolivasA Offline
            alfredoolivas
            last edited by

            😨 😨 😨 😨 😨 😨 😨 😨
            Gemini_Generated_Image_db278xdb278xdb27.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • sunsunsunS Offline
              sunsunsun @alfredoolivas
              last edited by sunsunsun

              @alfredoolivas do you think the phopshate deficient muscle that dbol puts on in that study is basically meaning that while gaining lean massthat ca:p ratio being lower is actually ok? on some bodybuilder diets phosphate can be 7.5g per day and i dont know if it is ok to have calcium come up even near that high.

              i guess the only way to know is to do blood work to see serum levels

              alfredoolivasA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • alfredoolivasA Offline
                alfredoolivas @sunsunsun
                last edited by

                @sunsunsun possible that dianabol, 17a estradiol or 17a methyl 1 testosterone or any of it's metabolites are diuretics... authors say it could be pottasium counteracting the phosphorus
                369c66a1-e983-429d-9857-328fc33548b1-image.png

                sunsunsunS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • alfredoolivasA Offline
                  alfredoolivas
                  last edited by alfredoolivas

                  Week 2: Down from 81kg to 79.5kg

                  Did my first hill climb. I don't even know how long it took but it was a hard climb. at least 15 minutes. felt like 30.
                  Gonna see how I recover. Durian Rider says hill climbs are the best exercise to lose fat, and I believe it kinda, because as soon as I got home after biking 40km including the hill climb, I felt really hot when I are dried mangoes.

                  engineerE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • engineerE Offline
                    engineer @alfredoolivas
                    last edited by

                    @alfredoolivas be careful, because once again hard exercise depletes glycogen -> low blood sugar -> high cortisol, or you do anaerobic oxidation which lactic acidmaxxes your cells

                    alfredoolivasA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • alfredoolivasA Offline
                      alfredoolivas @engineer
                      last edited by

                      @engineer Yeah I consumed 300g of sugar during my ride, and took aspirin and vitamin E.

                      engineerE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • engineerE Offline
                        engineer @alfredoolivas
                        last edited by

                        @alfredoolivas yeah, but now you're supplying all the energy you need to complete the hill climb. Once you get back home what is your metabolism doing now? Your glycogen is still full or marginally depleted and now you're doing the same thing as before when you weren't biking up that hill. So the net energy gain/loss is a wash. Plus you're not burning much more energy passively because cardio doesn't build muscle very well.

                        alfredoolivasA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • alfredoolivasA Offline
                          alfredoolivas @engineer
                          last edited by

                          @engineer Practice always beats theory, let's see how this goes. 1.5kg lost in two weeks is pretty good...

                          engineerE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • engineerE Offline
                            engineer @alfredoolivas
                            last edited by

                            @alfredoolivas weight on its own means absolute bumpkus, what you want instead is a body fat % or waist measurement

                            https://x.com/BerbarianWizard/status/2038909593217040435

                            "BTW, the most reliable and accessible way to track fat loss is your waist measurement.

                            Body weight fluctuates constantly due to changes in water retention, glycogen levels, digestion, minerals balance, and stress, which can easily mask real fat loss.

                            You can be losing fat while the scale stays the same or even increases, especially during recomposition, where you lose fat and gain muscle at the same time (muscle is denser than fat).

                            Your waist measurement reflects actual fat loss much more directly."

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • sunsunsunS Offline
                              sunsunsun @alfredoolivas
                              last edited by sunsunsun

                              @alfredoolivas I've read and re-read this study and fed it to Claude and I've come to the conclusion that it is strongly suggesting a potential dietary phosphate deficiency in phases of rapid muscle growth with anabolics, therefore the Ca:P ratio during bodybuilding where lots of lean mass is put on quickly, doesn't have to be 1:1, ∴ 'high' phosphate diet is actually ok and still peaty in this context because the phosphate is needed to incorporate into weight gain otherwise we get 'abnormal' phosphate deficient muscle and intracellular fluid.

                              The study is implying (we don't know for sure because phosphate wasn't measured, only a deficiency of it inferred via measurement of total body nitrogen and potassium, and even then not differentiated between these things in tissue vs. intercellular fluid) that the weight gained (either or both lean tissue and intercellular fluid) is phosphate deficient, which one is it lean tissue or fluid, I don't think they know, but in any case the weight gained is lacking in phosphate.

                              I think overall this means that there is some type of gains (strength or looks or both) left on the table for the typical steroid user with a relative phosphate deficient diet.

                              alfredoolivasA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • alfredoolivasA Offline
                                alfredoolivas @sunsunsun
                                last edited by

                                @sunsunsun Sushi you are right you genius.

                                "the phosphorus content of lean tissue is assumed to be 0.23 percent based on known composition of muscle (Pennington, 1994)"
                                They gained 3.13kg of lean tissue.
                                3130*0.0023 = 7.1999g of phosphurus

                                "The overall estimated mean value for both sexes combined is 54 mg (1.74 mmol) phosphorus accreted per day."
                                7200/54 = 133.33 days to sequester that phosphurus

                                This study was for 6 weeks, 42 days.

                                42*54 = 2268mg of phosphurus

                                That leaves us a "phosphurus debt" of 4931mg

                                @sunsunsun said in moggy chicken log:

                                I think overall this means that there is some type of gains (strength or looks or both) left on the table for the typical steroid user with a relative phosphate deficient diet.

                                @jamezb46 I think sushi is cooking with this one, the question of how important is phosphurus when it comes to building muscle mass. Is it required and does this debt hinder results? I don't think you can come to conclusions based off this study

                                alfredoolivasA sunsunsunS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • alfredoolivasA Offline
                                  alfredoolivas @alfredoolivas
                                  last edited by

                                  though, this whole hypothesis assumes that phosphurus uptake remains the same during AAS...

                                  alfredoolivasA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • alfredoolivasA Offline
                                    alfredoolivas @alfredoolivas
                                    last edited by

                                    All I could hypothesis from looking at the effects of androgens, their estrogen metabolites and their supression of glucorticoid receptor expression and translocation, was that the Pit1 ( type III sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter-1) is upregulated by glucocorticoid-induced kinase 3 (SGK3), which glucocorticoids upregule, so blocking cortisol from dianabol could decrease SGK3, decreasing Pit1, making sushi's argument even stronger

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • sunsunsunS Offline
                                      sunsunsun @alfredoolivas
                                      last edited by sunsunsun

                                      @alfredoolivas Youtube Video

                                      alfredoolivasA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • alfredoolivasA Offline
                                        alfredoolivas @sunsunsun
                                        last edited by

                                        @sunsunsun have you seen this study bro?
                                        ede9cbcc-2bef-4a1d-b910-8845a2f46e46-image.png

                                        https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5188456/#sec3-nutrients-08-00801

                                        sunsunsunS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • sunsunsunS Offline
                                          sunsunsun @alfredoolivas
                                          last edited by sunsunsun

                                          @alfredoolivas interdasting....

                                          other than switching to whole grains and seafoods (scallops have the most phosphorus of any not-organ meat I've found, and for the apparently most polluted Chinese scallops, up to 1.7kg [not nearly enough to make these scallops a significant protein source, 1.7kg is like 275g of protein] per week is 'safe', so it is probably higher for scallops from better water sources) the only reasonable way to get more phosphorus seems to be raw pumpkin seeds, which are quite significantly high in pufa. im not sure high uncooked natural food pufa intake is bad though, especially in context of high muscle mass.

                                          for some reason I was under the impression low fat white fish was significantly high in phosphorus compared to chicken breast but it's not significantly different for haddock vs chicken breast according to usda. it really seems like the only way to make up this theorized deficit is pufa foods like seeds and nuts.

                                          engineerE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • engineerE Offline
                                            engineer @sunsunsun
                                            last edited by

                                            @sunsunsun doesn't plain old milk have a lot of phosphorus

                                            sunsunsunS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 4 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post