Most bioenergetic country to move to
-
Why Warsaw? I think high altitude living in the Tatras would be nice if you like lots of snow. In my dreamscapes, I would summer in Poland and winter in Italy.
-
@coffee Warsaw is not an attractive place. The Tatra Mountains mentioned by the previous speaker are much better.
As for me, I would like to live in the tropics or high in the mountains. I am Polish and I often visit the Tatra Mountains.
I could live in the Alps, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, or Russia; Dagestan or Ichkeria.
Dagestan seems very interesting. They have many nutritional connections to the classic Peat diet.
-
I don't think the Russian climate is ideal but they certainly have a much better medical system and very interesting OTC medications. Also better food.
-
You can choose the live anywhere and live a Peaty lifestyle despite the limits that you may perceive.
I used to believe that urban centres with dense populations, multiethnic people, and other general unpleasantries were horrible, but I tried the more quieter suburban places and they are horrible in their own ways, I actually prefer the energy of cities, and since moving back to city I feel this cloud I had over my head dissipate from living in the suburbs.
I guess for you it’s just simply about perceiving thinking and acting, don’t let preconceived notions of what you think might be Peaty decide where you ought to live. -
I have a theory that west virginia suffers from endemic hypothyroidism.
-
Ray mentioned the Peruvian highlands, near the equator when he was asked this, I think in a kmud episode.
He also owned property in Bayard, New Mexico, near silver city and the Gila forest. There is a Benedictine monastery there too where the monks roast coffee.
in Mexico he lived in Coeneo de libertad but i heard that is cartel territory and you have to be fluent in Spanish. patzquaro is nearby which he liked a lot.
I agree with TopicalsOnBalls though. Ray said he only lived in Eugene because he could walk to the library from his house -
@insufferable From toxins? Don't they have a bit of elevation though...
-
This post is deleted! -
Tropical highlands seem the best. High desert seems good as well. Never lived in either. Only hot and humid, of se usa and ne usa. Sicily had a pretty good climate when I lived there along with decently high land.
-
Northern California Mountain range if it weren't so expensive
-
@Dakota I don't know what causes it. But the form of decline that region stereotypically has suggests bioenergetic problems to me. That kind of "can't summon the energy to repair the shed when a tree falls on it, just let it sit there half broken" kind of thing. That "what's the use" feeling. I'm pretty familiar with a "who cares" despair in myself, it's a vicious cycle of low energy.
(no offense WV bros. To be honest I haven't spent a lot of time there. And I'm picking WV as the most representative, but sadly I think a lot of the rural parts of the country have some of this going on.)
With that in mind I'd say the Peatiest place to live would be a place where there's a feedback loop of good energy, cultural structure: people doing things, caring about things, being positive, enterprising, having good energy. That energy is infectious.
-
@insufferable When I hear WV my mind goes to the DuPont scandal with PFAS, I think that something like that could have had a lasting impact on those community's in ways that we still don't understand. I'm sure there were higher rates of cretinism, etc. But I think the most bioenergetic country to move to would be somewhere with high elevation in Russia/Bulgaria since they already understand most of these ideas and have for decades and decades before many in the U.S. Carbon dioxide baths, man made pyramids, brain wave testing, orgone principles, etc. https://youtube.com/@bosanske.piramide?si=qHOOVVMy4TlYOwkc
