Songs you like
-
-
-
-
-
-
@NoeticJuice said in Songs you like:
Your Molecular Structure 2:11 Mose Allison The Best of Mose Allison Jazz 0 12
-
-
-
-
I really enjoy the album Urlo by Paolo Fresu and Furio Di Castri. Some tracks are more experimental than others - sometimes I skip them - but the rest are very nice atmospheric tracks. I really enjoy walking through the streets of Riga at night with this playing in the background as it makes me feel very in tune with the beautiful, bohemic city.
I also recommend Jimmy Guiffre's album Night Dance. Less experimental.
-
-
-
Anybody notice that the more a song correlates with a message, the less attractive and enjoyable it sounds? The more attractive music, is simply normal…
-
@LetTheRedeemed it's been a few days... if you're still interested, could you elaborate? Maybe give a few examples of "with a message" and "simply normal"?
I don't like most normal music, if normal is interpreted as meaning popular. But you might mean something else.
-
-
@NoeticJuice ehh… i’m tryna be nice:
The artsy fartsy stuff like This one, and some of your stuff
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XkFyAUyQ89s&list=RDXkFyAUyQ89s&start_radio=1
The “normal” songs are more broadly what Jennifer posts. I think mine have a good emphasis on good qualities of affability.
“Normal” art is a precarious position in the consumer world. It can be junk, but it has to appeal to the broadest market, so it necessarily takes the bare minimum steps to at least be attractive if not addictive in it’s music theory gaming and hamfisting.
-
@LetTheRedeemed said in Songs you like:
Anybody notice that the more a song correlates with a message, the less attractive and enjoyable it sounds?
I'd say that the songs you and Jennifer shared on this thread also have a message. Or, to use a different word, a meaning.
When it comes to lyrics, I don't think it's generally about having a message or not having one, but about what that message/meaning is and how it's conveyed. Different people relate to and experience them differently.
Preferences about how songs sounds like probably depend on some of the same things as the preference for meaning and way of conveying meaning, but with some differences.
A musician has a personality and a certain way their mind works (obviously. Maybe). If they start making music with an intent behind it, then that, along with the other aspects of the musician, shape the entire piece, including the lyrics and instrumentals. This could extend to a larger collection of humans, where they act as a unit with its own personality and cognition.
Thinking of it this way, it makes sense that meaning would correlate with sound. But since musical preference and preference for meaning don't depend on exactly the same things to exactly the same degree, not all good sounding songs also have a good meaning, and vice versa.
Just a possible explanation I came up with while thinking about your observation.
@LetTheRedeemed said in Songs you like:
ehh… i’m tryna be nice
You don't need to worry about offending me, but I appreciate the thought. Idk about peatolish though.
-
Culture and tradition also play a part here, but it might be included in the "larger collection of humans" category. There are also limiting/modifying factors, both mental (like knowledge of theory) and physical (like environment and available instruments).
This just turned into a general theory for how different types of music formed, didn't it
