Banned from RP forum : Can you do better than this.
-
@sphenoid Haha. Sure.
Dropping vitamin A fixes global warming.Dropping Vitamin A increased my bitcoin. Dropping Vitamin A got me a new car. -
@S-Holmes Welcome!!
-
@Regina
Thank you! -
@Regina said in Banned from RP forum : Can you do better than this.:
Haha. Sure.
Dropping vitamin A fixes global warming.Dropping Vitamin A increased my bitcoin. Dropping Vitamin A got me a new car.Excellent!
-
@Regina said in Banned from RP forum : Can you do better than this.:
Dropping Vitamin A increased my bitcoin.
*dogecoin
-
@Gaston Do you post under the same name? I donāt want to get you banned but it would be great if someone could send DMs to some of the remaining members to tell them weāre here. Iām sure Iām not the only one who lost private messages and no way of contacting those people
-
@S-Holmes He talks like a complete wingnut. Get the fuck out of here telling us to step aside while he turns Ray Peat forum into Grant Genereaux forum but doesnāt change the name and saying this is what Ray would have wanted. The audacity!!!!
-
@S-Holmes Were you banned for that comment?
-
@ilovethesea I'm shocked that I haven't been banned yet. No idea why.
-
@ilovethesea I post at RPF under a different name. I have personal info in my DM history, so I don't want to get too wild just in case Micropenis Charlie decides to go Third Revelation on me.
Perhaps someone else can help you with the DM campaign.
-
The dude is absolutely insane. Got banned a few hours ago. š«”
-
I like how he says he will "not be disrespected in his own house" ... a house that has someone else's name on it?
-
@max said in Banned from RP forum : Can you do better than this.:
I like how he says he will "not be disrespected in his own house" ... a house that has someone else's name on it?
I followed your story and I am not supprised. There is already a blog with Grant idea of low vit A where people are posting sinces years : No one is really interrested. He could also have proposed to sell the RPF to someone and make a new one with "Low Toxic Bile theory forum" but he knows that it will never interrest people. Using Ray's name is his only chance to have some trafic because people will still come and read about Ray. There was an active desire to destroy Ray's work but it won't work. Ray interviews are decentralized now and in every computer. It takes 24 hours to open a new forum and previews forum was saved in many computers around the world. Garret Smith has 24k supposed follower and has 3 to 10 likes every post with probably 2/3 false accounts he makes testimonials with to give some credit to his theory. But at the end of the day, once you get done with 2 hours Ray interview you're like "wow.... are all datas coming from his memory ?". When you come out of 2 hours garret smith you it's full of supposition, and research articles out of there context and global learning is poor. Ray will live eternaly and its work will just keep propagating.
-
@Regina said in Banned from RP forum : Can you do better than this.:
@sphenoid Haha. Sure.
Dropping vitamin A fixes global warming.Dropping Vitamin A increased my bitcoin. Dropping Vitamin A got me a new car.AHHAHAHAAHA
-
@Gaston No problem. Wouldnāt put it past him to read the DMs.
@max Iām glad you pushed him the way you did. He keeps trying to ignore and dodge that question of renaming the forum. (I asked the same thing myself and when he didnāt answer I said it was suspicious... that got me banned for ādisrespectā in āhis houseā hahaha)
At least now we know that asking to change the name is a bannable offense in RPF clown world.
@Harlock Spot on!
-
@max A house of cards though, just you wait, it's all going to come crashing down!
I hope RPF donators are cancelling their subscription/s, it all started going 'South' when that happened, the Lion sees it more as a business venture than principle/s -
@Not_James_Bond I am surprised from the start of Charlie's plan to transition to a subscriptions based model that there are people who believed in supporting charlie in subscribing to a forum already losing membership quality. Charlie knows it. The early members that provided much of the momentum and credibility to the forum have gone save for a few that still cling to the hope that the quality may yet be infused with new quality members. If there was some remaining value to the forum, it is in the quality of its trove of posts from early years. Very little quality remains from posts in the recent past. Newbies go through the wringer of bad advices from fellow members who can only give short advice often so banal you can get simply by googling, simply defeating the role a knowledgeable forum plays in countering the filtered results in Google where the intent is to lead people down rabbit holes and wild goose chases. With no third rail existing to stop bad advice from dominating the forum. No one is able and willing enough to arrest the downtrend in quality and the increase in garbage material coming in the form of thoughtlessly opinionated advice. The forum has turned into a cesspool I would no longer recommend friends to.
And all of what I just said is before Charlie began to shout as loudly to increase the destruction in the avalanche. I feel so bad this happened, as many unwitting and impressionable and credulous people are going to get trapped in the avalanche. I believe there would still be many trusting souls out there who do not know they are on a sinking ship and do not know the concept of cutting their losses, throwing good money after bad. I know one when I see one as I have a sister just like that. And it is a lost cause. The more I explain, the more she digs in. Doing the same thing that hasn't worked in the hope it will work the next time.
The subscription model of Charlie may still work for him unfortunately. There are plenty of morons who perceive value in paying for bad advice and very few sharp people who knows how to get good advice for free. There are enough morons around to contribute to charlie's grandiose plans to build his empire.
-
@yerrag hi, why do you call them morons? A good part of these people are not in optimal health, and some probably have health problems
-
@Truth Sorry if I should use that word liberally. But I still have to use that word because while it is not their fault they cannot think for themselves and have a need for a messiah to guide them, they are just like the voters in a democracy that continually get fooled into voting the wrong leaders.
What term would you use when you make an intelligent decision but accept it doesn't make a difference because you have to abide by the majority vote composed of morons?
If there are less morons, would there be less Charlies, and if there are less Charlies, would there be more hope in making the world better? Yet more and more morons exist in the US than at any time in history, not just in absolute terms, but in percentage. Let's just call a spade a spade and not soft-pedal it.
-
@yerrag If someone behaves unintelligently according to you on just one thing, does that make him a moron?
You don't think you've done anything that isn't/hasn't been "intelligent" this year? Do you see yourself as a moron?