New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User
-
Yes. (I'm late though--voicing my opinion anyways)
User should be reinstated if rules do not specify that racial slurs are cause for banning. Otherwise, you are banning them based on a whim. Change official rules to be updated to new standard if user base agrees.
-
What’s this Jovan mean?
I take it you have some Jewish heritage, enough that when I make basic factual statements it triggers you.
-
A reference to the subject of your previous avatar. Also alluded to in your merc thread.
No associated ethnicity. And Judaism is a religion, I am not religious.
You should probably get up Mr T.
-
Jews are also a distinct ethnic group, with distinct genetics and racial characteristics, if you were unaware.
Hence why you have atheistic Jews, Christian Jews, etc.
Are you aware of what your ancestry is?
-
Associated ethnic groups. Plural. As you appear unaware.
Yes Mr T. Way, way back when.
-
They cluster together nonetheless, whether you speak of Ashkenazim or Sephardim.
They are a distinct race, clustering between Europeans and Middle Easterners.
Quite different from a “religious group”.
-
I'd like to take a moment and thank you, for your tentative search break and muttering idiocy ongoing. The entertainment continues.
There are more than two.
And Judaism is a religion to which you are free to convert if you wish.
You have the floor. And for the foreseeable by the looks of it. Eat up.
-
I’m well read on the topic, thanks, just citing the 2 most prevalent to keep things simple for you.
Converting to Judaism is not as easy as you may think, at least not orthodox, some reform synagogues might accept you, but you would just be a shabbos goy. Just like most prevalent political figures who marry into powerful Jewish families (Trump, Biden). All of Trumps children are married to Jews.
I think your snarky passive aggressive writing style is indicative of your estrogen dominance sir… or ma’m whichever you prefer.
-
@ThinPicking said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
The purity of your projection is entertaining, NoLongerJovan.
Thank you.
Mr T, there are a few ways to read the advisories in (KJV) Revelation. You are here because you are sick. While I remain, in part, to understand and assist your malady. Another day.
-
Is English your second language?
I can’t tell if you’re just trying to be pretentious or if you genuinely don’t know how to form a clear sentence.
-
-
Another day. M’lady tips fedora
-
@RawGoatMilk88
You’ve made lots a sweeping statements about Jews, just curious how much reading you’ve actually done on Jewish history and practices.
Again, even if these things were 100% true, it’s not germane to the topic of calling out a forum owner as Jewish, like that’s any sort of warranted thing to do, which is what zoomerdoomer and a few others did, which is all I care to address.
-
It is important to know who’s who and who’s Jew….
-
@RawGoatMilk88 when you turn 30, and if you begin attracting normal girls for marriage, you’ll realize how retarded that is ️
-
Just my two cents...
I.
Things like racial/woke/gender slurs usually indicate that someone is unfortunately still under the control of the system (you can call it matrix, memeplex, perverse assemblage, or just false narratives).https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonizing_the_enemyThose above are just smoke and mirrors to keep one from fighting/escaping a (rigged) system...
II.
Regarding moderation and forum rules: according to the theory and praxis of complex systems (AKA Chaos Theory) a system (like a forum) without constraints and attractors will always be in permanent high chaos.Therefore, It would be good to conceive some enabling constraints (guidelines) and emphasize that the main attractor is an educational exchange about bioenergetics as a medicine and philosophy...
That can be done with the help of pinned posts, FAQs, and proper moderation.
Examples of enabling constraints:
Forum entries should be- substantive and respectful
- with minimal or no personal name-calling
- without informal fallacies like a straw man, etc...
I hope this helps...
-
Thank you for bringing Nick Hiebert and surrounding incidents to my attention
-
When I looked up Nick Hiebert this came up:
https://youtu.be/cX5KJJEF0t8?si=qzigbDAUmIh_pR6d -
@doomerzoomer3, 4 or 5. You should come back for further analysis.
-
@ThinPicking said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
@doomerzoomer3, 4 or 5. You should come back for further analysis.
What did you do to him? I really wanted him to deconstruct errors in the video on seed oils. It was a short video…
I begin to doubt his analysis of Kyle Mamounis’ twitter “debate.”