Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?
-
lol not you corngold. Not noticeably anyway. But it's a pathology. I have been and probably will be again, goblin afflicted.
-
This post is deleted! -
@Dedeluded said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
downstream
afik
It's entirely possible our views are inverted.
@ThinPicking said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
What if your condition has a reference range, and what if indication is all around and behind you.
@Dedeluded said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
that reflects his mindset as the poster suggested
The poster asked a question. He's on a journey or something.
@wester130 said in The ‘Fall’ of man from a new perspective.:
what is a "man"?
-
This post is deleted! -
@Dedeluded said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
t4 converts to t3. That would be downstream no?
@Dedeluded said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
Thyroid is farther downstream than testosterone in the sense that it's the final active form
I'm a little confused. But that's ok.
@Dedeluded said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
manly stuff
Apparently he doesn't know what a "man" is.
@Dedeluded said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
Being cryptic doesn't help anyone in any way.
Welcome to earth. If you know the way we're all ears.
-
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
@Dedeluded said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
Don't be confused
t3 is downstream of t4
Pregnenolone is not downstream bc it's the first
Testosterone continues converting but is downstream of pregnenolone.
Ok but you asked if thyroid and preg are cop outs in comparison to testosterone. I described them further upstream and more fundamental. You're free to differ.
On earth you work with actual information to reach rational conclusions. We should all aspire to get there
I'll stick with my original answer to OPs question. But thank you for your thoughts on testosterone recommendations and what constitutes manly things.
-
I would make the case for a sense of humour. Definite sarcasm as you didn't ask.
-
This post is deleted! -
I'm not talking about synthesis. Only that if you're not cooking ATP then the golden goose isn't much use. There is crosstalk between those systems, but still. If you're metabolically well, eating plenty of sat lipids and the other goods, testosterone ought to be where it needs to be.
-
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
@Alomongerpete Obviously
In time there is life but no knowledge; outside time there is knowledge but no life
-
@wester130 said in Peat did not believe in the androgenic man?:
His love of painting, art and poetry
His recommendation of progesterone
A preference for an introspective, reflective thoughtful life
Your title question is about what he believed
But
Your text above is about who he was
So im unsure of what you are askingI comment to point out
Have you seen his subjects of a majority of his artwork?
Naked womenHe was a man who found beauty in women
Extremely “androgenic” although nothing to do with mass or hair etc
-
Well I guess Jacob was preferred by God to Esau. So there's that.
-
-
I envisioned Peat as a mythical autistic hermit. I kind of Yoda
I found out he was married for decades when he died and the image shattered. Still hard to imagine
