New "Mission" of RPF
-
I would think that Smith appearing before the medical examiners board would be using the process as intended.
-
@Jaffe said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Lol since when do we trust the Board to make a just decision?
I watched Dr. Paul Thomas in real time get his license suspended, lose his practice, and ultimately forced into retirement by the Board over his vaccine beliefs. Something we all align with. He wasn’t even anti-vaccine. Didn’t matter. The Board made his life hell. It’s all documented on his YouTube channel.
We all know Board investigations are just making sure you’re inline with their status quo.
Sending complaints of Garret to the Board has nothing to do with patient safety concern, but some vendetta stemming from the RPF drama earlier in the year.
Your attempt to conflate the Arizona Naturopathic Physicians Medical Board with the Oregon Medical Board in different contexts is spurious at best. "The board" will apply due process and reveal its own faults on record. Which is one of the reasons "mainstream" medicine is in a state of utter disarray right now.
The specifics in process are a democratic issue. And "certified" "professionals" bear some responsibility to shape or dismantle it in both directions for their proximity to institutions. Whether they like it or not. Whether they're engaged in conversation or being made an example.
As do you. And I (different country, similar paradigm). Even if your metabolic rate is too low to think it through in context. Assuming there aren't other reasons you're being obtuse.
Have a great day Jaffe.
-
@Peatful I think the solution there is for the parents to stop following the dictates of authority figures and fad trends rather than haul Dr Dipshit before the board.
-
America will probably be needing another temporary Elysium to deal with the consequences of this notion. A "Metaverse" is unlikely to cut the mustard.
It is of course entirely possible I'm simply missing Shaolin wisdom. I certainly wouldn't mess with a practitioner of such things.
-
Idealistically, of course
Again, this is my corner of the world,
and realistically, we need principled and “egoless” practitioners
Among many other things….This is one of the primary reasons I paid attention to Peat
Compare these men…
-
All this pro Smith or Smith is the victim (simplifying this because im at work) is shocking to me and quite misguided
-
@Peatful I feel like Smith's time in the sun ended already
-
@Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Peatful I feel like Smith's time in the sun ended already
Well
Wouldn’t that be grandIf you ever want to explain why you think that-
Im all ears -
@Peatful because we're the only idiots talking about him
-
Your inner and outer voice may be a touch more significant than you realise. But don't let it go to your head (hold it in your heart).
-
OK
Thx
not the angle I was expectingThey changed a whole website -
threw a genius of a man under the bus and has called his life’s work toxic because of their stupidity and lack of understandingIn principle alone- yes- I will talk about that
For me, ultimately, this is about the integrity of Peat’s name, work and legacy
It’s not about these unfuckable idiotsOne act of obedience is better than one hundred sermons.
-DB
-
Well said @Peatful, even the sweary bit
-
@Peatly appreciate it
-
-
Amazing, thanks.
I'll watch through properly tomorrow but...
"That's quite an interesting statement from this individual."
Yes sir Mr Fave. Yes sir. A lot going on there.
-
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
A Jennifer... Wild horses? (A reference to a quotation that landed.)
Couldn't drag me away?
-
Ah sorry that was probably confusing.
I recalled an Isadora Duncan quote from RPF, my brain had folded in to a meta-meme with the Rolling Stones. From the other side, with memory and (probably) an unhealthy degree of humour.
-
@Peatful said in New "Mission" of RPF:
OK
Thx
not the angle I was expectingThey changed a whole website -
threw a genius of a man under the bus and has called his life’s work toxic because of their stupidity and lack of understandingIn principle alone- yes- I will talk about that
For me, ultimately, this is about the integrity of Peat’s name, work and legacy
It’s not about these unfuckable idiots'they' is perhaps ten incorrigible religious maniacs and maybe another ten people on twitter following this low vitamin A thing
I don't think it has the momentum to fully obscure Ray, self-implosion is probably more likely.
Maybe what bothers me the most is that place was always doing damage to Ray's name and his work and we're acting like it's new. It's just more insane and overt now thanks to Chuck's midlife meltdown.
-
@Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I don't think it has the momentum to fully obscure Ray, self-implosion is probably more likely.
Now, maybe.
Some months ago I had a chilling and hilarious vision where that crap found its way to the capstone and low Vitamin A GMO slop became a focus of biotech beside the deleterious behavioural trends.
(Not riding your conversation to be rude here Hando or expecting response. You two would have your piece IRL before I said a word and assuming there was any interest in listening to another.)
@Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Maybe what bothers me the most is that place was always doing damage to Ray's name and his work and we're acting like it's new. It's just more insane and overt now thanks to Chuck's midlife meltdown.
Dialogue beside publication or other dialogue is probably inevitable. Interruption probably the same. And some will always have the wrong of the stick. A daily self inquisition for me, which stick and which end. If I can't figure it out, someone else has or does.
-
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I don't think it has the momentum to fully obscure Ray, self-implosion is probably more likely.
Now, maybe.
Some months ago I had a chilling and hilarious vision where that crap found its way to the capstone and low Vitamin A GMO slop became a focus of biotech beside the deleterious behavioural trends.
haha
(Not riding your conversation to be rude here Hando or expecting response. You two would have your piece IRL before I said a word and assuming there was any interest in listening to another.)
all good
peace be upon all of you
