New "Mission" of RPF
-
i am personally waiting for that smith fella to start claiming he can now cure cancer with low vitamin a. he already claimed the diet was responsible for a woman giving a miraculous birth or something.
any day now....
-
@brad Yessiree!!!
-
@risingfire not gonna lie either. I hate to disappoint but all there is - pipsqueak
-
Testing... 1... 2... 3
Edit: Oh hi @yerrag !
-
@Jam Nice to see you here, have you also given up on that other forum?
Still taking the Potassium Iodide???? -
@Jam I knew you would pop up one of these days. Welcome!
-
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,
Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs
Thrive for the highest degree of energy
-
@risingfire said in New "Mission" of RPF:
It's becoming beyond obvious that Charlie and InChristAlone are the same person. Every time Charlie posts so does ICA
I don't think so. She has been on the forum a long time (as sugarbabe, and before as Janelle) and the deterioration can be clearly observed if you read her posts over the years. I don't even think she's Charlie's real life associate or one of his wives. She just has really strong parasocial relationship to him and the forum, and clearly has suffered a lot of life stresses of the kind that cannot be mitigated by any diet, supplement or pharmaceutical. I feel bad for her.
-
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
Alright everyone, some wag beat me to my RPF username. I am in the A-curious camp but it's unequivocally not up for discussion...so there we go.
-
@Verdad said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Make no mistake Charlie is heading in the direction of banning everyone who even suggests that Vitamin A is not a toxin.
Well called. Just 12 hours later it happened.
-
@TheSir Hi, he potentially wants to do the same thing about vitamin D supplementation, potentially he doesn't only because he's afraid of the potential consequences if he bans Georgi "haidut"
-
If I was close to Katherine
Say a Danny Roddy closeness
I would like to see if she is aware of this connection to his nameThis feels not only unwell
Not only dirty
But possibly illegalMy FIL is a lawyer
Not his specialty
But I think I’d like to see what he thinksGrieving with you all….
-
@Peatful
Is Danny aware of the degeneration of RPF? He had an account there but wasn't active. I don't use any social media and don't know how to contact him.Maybe he could talk to Katherine about it. It's an utter disgrace that his name is being dragged through the mud with that forum named after him. I can't imagine that his widow is pleased by that.
-
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/the-official-state-of-the-forum-address-unprecedented-strength-and-unwavering-vision.52617/post-985247This is all so wild. I'd say I can scarcely believe my own eyes, but I can. This is the depth now. The Mariana Trench of "leadership".
-
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,
Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs
Charlie who potentially tries to act and make people believe that he shares Raymond Peat's ideas with some "Ray peat right again" label to potentially try to damage control his previous post on pro vitamin A studies not being allowed
-
@Truth I knew he was eventually going there. Cults and dogmatics always end at this point. They know they cannot fully defend their position so they just shut it down.
The RPF is officially dead @Charlie you are an absolute disgrace! I can't believe i supported you all these years and gave you money. No doubt the forum will now collapse into oblivion as everyone is essentially walking on eggshells afraid of getting banned. Free discussions of ideas are now gone.
I see he still has the motto "perceive, think, act" on the head of the website what hilarious irony.
-
Yes
CorrectThe Ray Peat Right Again triteness was a CYA move imo
Thx for the updates
-
@Verdad said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Truth I knew he was eventually going there. Cults and dogmatics always end at this point. They know they cannot fully defend their position so they just shut it down.
The RPF is officially dead @Charlie you are an absolute disgrace! I can't believe i supported you all these years and gave you money. No doubt the forum will now collapse into oblivion as everyone is essentially walking on eggshells afraid of getting banned. Free discussions of ideas are now gone.
I see he still has the motto "perceive, think, act" on the head of the website what hilarious irony.
Instead of "perceive, think, act," it's more like "observe, follow, obey."
-
@Verdad said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I see he still has the motto "perceive, think, act" on the head of the website what hilarious irony.
George Orwell would be proud.
-
@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."
To then say it's an essential nutrient
This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,
Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs
Charlie who is potentially trying to make people believe that Raymond Peat's perspective on receptors implies that if there are no receptors for a certain element/nutrient, then that element is not essential, Raymond absolutely never said that(from what i have Seen), Raymond said that even without receptors various elements/nutrients have positive effects
