New "Mission" of RPF

[S.Holmes]

@CO2 said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Peatful charlie banned you on the rpf for something you said here?

I too was banned from the RPF for comments made here. I was informed that we were being "watched." Not creepy at all.

[CO2]

That's crazy. When I went to sign up here someone had already taken my rpf name and has been posting, not sure if people are impersonating accounts from the other forum here but I probably wouldn't have used the same name anyway considering that lunatic charlie would be monitoring this forum.

[chosroes]

@Kvothe said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Yeah, Charles definitely doesn't have any alt accounts
Quite amazing how he seems to be unable to even slightly alter his writting style/choice of words.

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/i-was-skeptical-at-first-too-but-the-changes-really-are-astounding.52699/

While dumping toxins is of course generally awesome, avoiding carrots and eating beans does have the unfortunate side-effect of introducing particular spelling errors in the writings of the newly converted

Feel like I've been seeing the similarly peculiar "low and behold" used a bit too much in the RPF posts since this weird stuff has been going on

[risingfire]

Funny how the times have changed - Dr. Garret Smith right again

Charlie sounds unhinged in "the toxins always win."

[ilovethesea]

@Barghest yes and Dave Asprey mentioned Ray the other day too!

They’re now calling us paranoid haters... of course vitamin A causes that too! We’re “toxic and deficient”
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/i-was-skeptical-at-first-too-but-the-changes-really-are-astounding.52699/page-3

Shocked that Memphisto didn’t get banned yet, he got away with saying much more than any of us were allowed to. Meanwhile Christ lady insisting that she hasn’t seen anyone disrespecting Ray... you have to laugh.

@C-Mex your post disappeared for some reason but I had the same thought, it’s very convenient for the ruling class to be able to blame “genetics” to cover up environmental poisoning. So maybe this vitamin A idea is the same thing.

@risingfire it was only a matter of time before he’d make a Garrett banner. I hate his boomer hat tip emoji as well 🤮

[A Former User]

@ilovethesea

Yes, I deleted my post this morning after reading the article you posted and realized I had posted something that was way down in the comments section but not the article, and wanted to recompose my thoughts. I've just seen more of this over on RPF though. Apparently the claim is that Vitamin A and copper make you an 'antenna' for EMF (and glyphosate damage, and vaccine injury and [fill in the inconvenient research topic]. I think it is a way to obfuscate and confuse and cast doubt on research that Ray Peat talked about early on that is now gaining a wider acceptance. They've studied our posts on RPF for years, IMO, and know the language and how to throw in a thing or two about Bill Gates, controlled opposition or a global agenda to make it sound like they're right in there with us, but talk as though they're uncovering the real truth that Ray Peat and the rest of us failed to see and now we're so vitamin A and copper-toxic that we're downright paranoid and really should be minding our own business.

[Kvothe]

@chosroes The "per say" is a nice one. His lies are as well crafted as those of 6 year old.

[Peatly]

@chosroes Well spotted

[A Former User]

@C-Mex

Here is the comment from 2019. I expect to see more along these lines as Vitamin A gets demonized and becomes the scapegoat. If it weren't for that pesky Vitamin A, nobody would ever get Seasonal Affective Disorder when working long hours indoors, or when they engineer a way to block the sun.

[A Former User]

Posted by a user under Charlie's announcement of RP's 'blessing'/ Although obviously I can't vouch for its veracity. It does have the common theme with the e-mail to Danny that RP was concerned about some personal comments made about him and about Progest-e. It will be interesting to see if Charlie produces the e-mail from Ray he claims to have.

[Peatly]

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Posted by a user under Charlie's announcement of RP's 'blessing'/ Although obviously I can't vouch for its veracity. It does have the common theme with the e-mail to Danny that RP was concerned about some personal comments made about him and about Progest-e. It will be interesting to see if Charlie produces the e-mail from Ray he claims to have.

Have you see this thread?

https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/1204/helpful-moderation-according-to-ray-peat?_=1709152867640&lang=en-US

[brightside]

LMAO, Impero is an absolute boss

See the conversation that followed the image above (link)

Charlie replies:

Nothing but breaking down the character of people instead of addressing the problem

Then Impero replies:

Charlie then finds an X thread where Impero wants to "have some fun"

Finally, Impero replies, presenting Charlie with an option: Ban him and confirm that it's fake, prove that they conversations are real and post proof.

[Barghest]

@brightside how hard is it to post proof? he obviously faked those conversations. He really fucked himself by pretending he's got Peat's endorsement.

[brightside]

@Barghest

YUP. He really dug himself a hole there. I made sure to screenshot the above conversation in case he realizes that not removing it makes him look really dumb and like a liar.

Sucks that he found Impero's twitter thread, would have been interesting to see what charlie would have replied..

[Barghest]

@brightside I thought imperos motives were a little obvious, he should have at least not posted on twitter to have plausible deniability, but in the end charlie still ends up looking like a fool so i guess it's a win. I've started saving screenshots of everything just in case too.

[brightside]

@Barghest

Definitely a bit obvious, agreed.

Oh well, still entertaining.

[CO3]

@Peatly To me this does not read like Ray.

[Barghest]

[Amazoniac]

The exchange must be legitimate, the lion might have altered the part for emphasis, but it's not a big deal. I wouldn't get caught up on it, as it can be used to distract people from the main issue, letting tension build up around it on purpose, only to discredit the indignant as fools later.

• "Can I open up a forum with your name for people to come together, discuss health and your teachings?"
• "Umm.. I think so."
• "Would you mind if somewhere along the way I turned it into a racket, tried to appropriate members' posts, disseminated that your approach kills persons and should be ditched to save humanity, imposed my mentor's ideology that poison A is a toxin, corrupted the space into a nucleus of misinformation and alarmism, banned contrarians who crossed my path to question authority, but not missing the chance to laugh at their faces?"
• "Oh, it's o.k. with me, but I don't know if I'll have time to follow its development."

---

Edit: I read Barghest's message after posting.

[A Former User]

@Amazoniac

It is possible that all three e-mails are legitimate (to "Charlie", to Danny, to the unknown recipient in 2020), Ray Peat could have given permission for a discussion board bearing his name in his generous spirit but over the years had misgivings after what it became... Doubtful he gave his 'blessing' to have his character or his product denigrated while others are promoted, and he seems to have believed it was intentional.