New "Mission" of RPF
-
Took me a while... According to public records, David has no political party affiliation.
-
That apparent email from Peat is completely fake because he doesn't talk like that, if you have ever corresponded with Peat you would know.
Charlie has a plethora of accounts on the forum pretending to be other people replying and agreeing with himself.
-
Among all of the other reasons it seems fake, it seems odd that Ray Peat would suggest these goals to a stranger simply wanting to start a discussion board about his research into health issues. Why would he want Charlie to have an agenda and/or to think about disestablishing medicine (which I think he said once when asked if he had an end goal) for people looking for alternative health info? These are pretty good motives for the medical industrial complex and big pharma to be threatened however.
-
@ilovethesea said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Barghest @TheRealPeater there might be some more on Miles M if you search the Darkside chat, I remember seeing something about the fallout between him and Josh a while back. I just know his story sounds fake as hell... he’s a broke artist, supposedly makes a living from people commissioning his paintings, and then somehow has time to research and write multiple 20 page documents per week on every hoax throughout history and all the genealogy.
Here’s Josh claiming Grant Genereux is the “Miles Mathis of nutrition” https://cuttingthroughthefogcom.wordpress.com/2018/05/08/defending-miles-mathis/comment-page-19/#comment-11534
Thanks I will read that later!
-
@CO2 “a plethora of accounts”
Yep
What got me banned was stating that HERE (on the BEF) about a month ago
Now I understand why….
-
@Peatful charlie banned you on the rpf for something you said here?
-
@CO2 yes. Correct.
-
@CO2 said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Peatful charlie banned you on the rpf for something you said here?
I too was banned from the RPF for comments made here. I was informed that we were being "watched." Not creepy at all.
-
That's crazy. When I went to sign up here someone had already taken my rpf name and has been posting, not sure if people are impersonating accounts from the other forum here but I probably wouldn't have used the same name anyway considering that lunatic charlie would be monitoring this forum.
-
@Kvothe said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Yeah, Charles definitely doesn't have any alt accounts
Quite amazing how he seems to be unable to even slightly alter his writting style/choice of words.While dumping toxins is of course generally awesome, avoiding carrots and eating beans does have the unfortunate side-effect of introducing particular spelling errors in the writings of the newly converted
Feel like I've been seeing the similarly peculiar "low and behold" used a bit too much in the RPF posts since this weird stuff has been going on
-
Funny how the times have changed - Dr. Garret Smith right again
Charlie sounds unhinged in "the toxins always win."
-
@Barghest yes and Dave Asprey mentioned Ray the other day too!
They’re now calling us paranoid haters... of course vitamin A causes that too! We’re “toxic and deficient”
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/i-was-skeptical-at-first-too-but-the-changes-really-are-astounding.52699/page-3Shocked that Memphisto didn’t get banned yet, he got away with saying much more than any of us were allowed to. Meanwhile Christ lady insisting that she hasn’t seen anyone disrespecting Ray... you have to laugh.
@C-Mex your post disappeared for some reason but I had the same thought, it’s very convenient for the ruling class to be able to blame “genetics” to cover up environmental poisoning. So maybe this vitamin A idea is the same thing.
@risingfire it was only a matter of time before he’d make a Garrett banner. I hate his boomer hat tip emoji as well 🤮
-
Yes, I deleted my post this morning after reading the article you posted and realized I had posted something that was way down in the comments section but not the article, and wanted to recompose my thoughts. I've just seen more of this over on RPF though. Apparently the claim is that Vitamin A and copper make you an 'antenna' for EMF (and glyphosate damage, and vaccine injury and [fill in the inconvenient research topic]. I think it is a way to obfuscate and confuse and cast doubt on research that Ray Peat talked about early on that is now gaining a wider acceptance. They've studied our posts on RPF for years, IMO, and know the language and how to throw in a thing or two about Bill Gates, controlled opposition or a global agenda to make it sound like they're right in there with us, but talk as though they're uncovering the real truth that Ray Peat and the rest of us failed to see and now we're so vitamin A and copper-toxic that we're downright paranoid and really should be minding our own business.
-
@chosroes The "per say" is a nice one. His lies are as well crafted as those of 6 year old.
-
@chosroes Well spotted
-
@C-Mex
Here is the comment from 2019. I expect to see more along these lines as Vitamin A gets demonized and becomes the scapegoat. If it weren't for that pesky Vitamin A, nobody would ever get Seasonal Affective Disorder when working long hours indoors, or when they engineer a way to block the sun.
-
Posted by a user under Charlie's announcement of RP's 'blessing'/ Although obviously I can't vouch for its veracity. It does have the common theme with the e-mail to Danny that RP was concerned about some personal comments made about him and about Progest-e. It will be interesting to see if Charlie produces the e-mail from Ray he claims to have.
-
@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Posted by a user under Charlie's announcement of RP's 'blessing'/ Although obviously I can't vouch for its veracity. It does have the common theme with the e-mail to Danny that RP was concerned about some personal comments made about him and about Progest-e. It will be interesting to see if Charlie produces the e-mail from Ray he claims to have.
Have you see this thread?
A successful depopulation agenda requires high excess death rates, lower birth rates and for the majority to vilify those that question it.
-
LMAO, Impero is an absolute boss
See the conversation that followed the image above (link)
Charlie replies:
Nothing but breaking down the character of people instead of addressing the problemThen Impero replies:
Charlie then finds an X thread where Impero wants to "have some fun"
Finally, Impero replies, presenting Charlie with an option: Ban him and confirm that it's fake, prove that they conversations are real and post proof.
-
@brightside how hard is it to post proof? he obviously faked those conversations. He really fucked himself by pretending he's got Peat's endorsement.
