Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.

    Bioenergetic Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Glyphosate doesn't matter

    Bioenergetics Discussion
    14
    23
    1.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bradB
      brad @anabology
      last edited by

      @anabology

      • Glyphosate may substitute for glycine and contribute to kidney failure.
      • Glyphosate is a probable carcinogen according to the IARC monograph.
      • Glyphosate was only initially approved by the EPA on the back of fraudulent trials, one where the PI was eventually jailed, and another where a cancer specialist found the carcinogicity statistically insignificant because he found a small tumor in the control group

      There are many good books about it, including Whitewash by Carey Gillam. You can also watch the lawyer Brent Wisner, who won the $B verdicts against Monsanto, argue his closing statement that glyphosate is carcinogenic, genotoxic, and hepatotoxic.

      Ray does mention glyphosate, he says, "Glyphosate is very bad because it's poisonous in a variety of ways."

      The arguments about low acute toxicity are exactly what the Monsanto lawyers use and I don't think they apply because we're chronically exposed, which is why glyphosate is found in breast milk, urine, and blood of practically everyone in this country. We should probably follow Mexico and Russia and ban it outright.

      bradB PUFADestroyerPPOP FructoseF 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bradB
        brad @brad
        last edited by

        @anabology One more thing about microplastics - they're xenoestrogens. So when he was talking about ubiquitous estrogenic compounds in the environment or stressors he's implicitly including microplastics.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I
          iPeat
          last edited by iPeat

          Stephanie Seneff, the most knowledgeable person I've ever seen on glyphosate, theorizes that glyphosate can get mistakenly placed in the glycine position in peptides in the body. Doing so in just the right spot, would only take a handful of glyphosate molecules to wreak havoc. Glyphosate to her is what PUFA was to Peat. She has me convinced, at least.

          W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • anabologyA
            anabology @peatilian
            last edited by

            @peatilian lol the first study you posted
            “Furthermore, a testosterone/estrogen imbalance was evident with testosterone serum levels significantly increased by 97 % by comparison to controls, while estradiol serum levels were decreased by 26 %.”

            Glyphosate increases testosterone lmao

            maybe yall are right tho

            ahA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • HimmlerH
              Himmler @anabology
              last edited by

              @anabology “peat didn’t talk about it so it didn’t matter” fucking gorilla nigger brain

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ahA
                ah @anabology
                last edited by

                @anabology if that's accurate, I suspect that since glyphosate is directly estrogenic, increased estrogen signalling over time would downregulate aromatase, all the while overall estrogenic effects are still higher than baseline

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • PUFADestroyerPPOP
                  PUFADestroyerPPO @brad
                  last edited by

                  @brad Based Brad, opposing evil Monsanto.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • FructoseF
                    Fructose @brad
                    last edited by

                    @brad said in Glyphosate doesn't matter:

                    Według monografii IARC glifosat jest prawdopodobnym czynnikiem rakotwórczym .

                    the evidence for this is inconclusive. It's hard to say whether this is actually true. Other institutions have denied that glyphosate is highly carcinogenic.

                    @brad said in Glyphosate doesn't matter:

                    Glifosat może zastąpić glicynę i przyczynić się do niewydolności nerek .

                    the article discusses the synergistic effect of the substance on renal failure. The importance of FLUORINE, HEAVY METALS AND DEHYDRATION was also emphasized. The article itself raises the issue of people working in agriculture. I don't think this has anything to do with the average consumer.

                    The importance of glyphosate in the pathophysiology of kidney disease requires better research.

                    bradB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • W
                      wazvvy @iPeat
                      last edited by

                      @iPeat said in Glyphosate doesn't matter:

                      Stephanie Seneff, the most knowledgeable person I've ever seen on glyphosate, theorizes that glyphosate can get mistakenly placed in the glycine position in peptides in the body. Doing so in just the right spot, would only take a handful of glyphosate molecules to wreak havoc. Glyphosate to her is what PUFA was to Peat. She has me convinced, at least.

                      She convinced me as well. I make sure to get as much glycine as possible throughout the day.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • skylarkS
                        skylark
                        last edited by

                        What a weird post. Ray has said himself that glyphosate causes genetic, mitochondrial and nerve damage. Just because it's water soluble and leaves the body quickly doesn't mean it's not toxic and degrading to an organism. It will leave permanent changes to an organism, just like any powerful substance, and in the amounts used by the agricultural industry, it's completly ignorant to believe that it doesn't have a significantly negative effect on modern ecology and the biological quality of man.

                        Good things are immeasurably costly

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • CornelyanC
                          Cornelyan
                          last edited by

                          No glyphosate and microplastics are real issues in the sense Peat often mentioned the omnipresence of stressors and especially endocrine disruptors and the fact it runs your glycine stores dry and could lead to degenerative diseases

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • bradB
                            brad @Fructose
                            last edited by

                            @Fructose FYI your quotes are in Polish while I was typing in English. Interesting localization logic on the forum.

                            I agree that neither of those studies are conclusive on their own. If you listen to the Brent Wisner closing statement he does a more thorough review of the literature where there's adequate evidence to support genotoxicity, renotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. And he shows that the initial approval of glyphosate/Roundup was a sham.

                            Since there's no way to avoid it when in use as it becomes a ubiquitous environmental contaminant, I think following the precautionary principle and banning it outright would be the most healthful and environmentally sound option.

                            FructoseF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • FructoseF
                              Fructose @brad
                              last edited by

                              @brad said in Glyphosate doesn't matter:

                              @Fructose FYI your quotes are in Polish while I was typing in English. Interesting localization logic on the forum.

                              I agree that neither of those studies are conclusive on their own. If you listen to the Brent Wisner closing statement he does a more thorough review of the literature where there's adequate evidence to support genotoxicity, renotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. And he shows that the initial approval of glyphosate/Roundup was a sham.

                              Since there's no way to avoid it when in use as it becomes a ubiquitous environmental contaminant, I think following the precautionary principle and banning it outright would be the most healthful and environmentally sound option.

                              What do you mean by "Interesting localization logic"?

                              That's right, I come from Poland.

                              Indeed, I need to dig deeper into Brent's views/statement. Thanks.

                              bradB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • bradB
                                brad @Fructose
                                last edited by

                                @Fructose
                                Here's what I saw:
                                Screenshot 2024-01-30 at 10.56.07 AM.png

                                FructoseF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • FructoseF
                                  Fructose @brad
                                  last edited by

                                  @brad said in Glyphosate doesn't matter:

                                  @Fructose
                                  Here's what I saw:
                                  Screenshot 2024-01-30 at 10.56.07 AM.png

                                  Sometimes, if I don't understand something, I use Google translate. That's why it's in Polish 👍

                                  bradB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • bradB
                                    brad @Fructose
                                    last edited by

                                    @Fructose Oh okay that makes sense now. @LaneswapSlides mentioned at one point that the forum language was localized so I thought maybe it translated posts as well.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 1
                                    • 2
                                    • 1 / 2
                                    • First post
                                      Last post