Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.

    Bioenergetic Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    New "Mission" of RPF

    Bioenergetics Discussion
    118
    1.8k
    322.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      bot-mod @Matt1951
      last edited by

      @Matt1951

      Thank you Matt 🙇

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jjk_learning @Matt1951
        last edited by jjk_learning

        @Matt1951 said in New "Mission" of RPF:

        There is going to be a Medical Board hearing for Dr. Smith May 9. I will post the results.

        What is your goal for the complaint you filed with the board? And what is the basis of the complaint?

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bot-mod @jjk_learning
          last edited by

          @jjk_learning

          Why does the board exist. And what is the point of licensing.

          https://bioenergetic.forum/post/14046

          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jjk_learning @bot-mod
            last edited by

            @ThinPicking

            I read that post but don't really understand the basis of the complaint. That Smith is endangering children? It reads to me like a personal attempt to destroy Smith's livelihood.

            This same logic from that post could be used to go after someone who promotes discarding "essential fatty acid" PUFAs or anything else.

            I suppose the board will be able to handle it however they feel appropriate but I disagree strongly with the idea of going after someone's license over dietary disagreements such as this.

            B P J 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              bot-mod @jjk_learning
              last edited by

              @jjk_learning said in New "Mission" of RPF:

              I suppose the board will be able to handle it however they feel appropriate but I disagree strongly with the idea of going after someone's license over dietary disagreements such as this.

              Yes, they will. That's the point. To ask structured questions that require structured responses. On record.

              The issue is a bit more nuanced than "dietary disagreements". But you're entitled to indignation at the thought of it.

              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jjk_learning @bot-mod
                last edited by

                @ThinPicking In what way is it more nuanced?

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bot-mod @jjk_learning
                  last edited by

                  @jjk_learning

                  Other sources of cognition are available.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    Peatful @jjk_learning
                    last edited by

                    @jjk_learning said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                    @ThinPicking

                    I read that post but don't really understand the basis of the complaint. That Smith is endangering children? It reads to me like a personal attempt to destroy Smith's livelihood.

                    This same logic from that post could be used to go after someone who promotes discarding "essential fatty acid" PUFAs or anything else.

                    I suppose the board will be able to handle it however they feel appropriate but I disagree strongly with the idea of going after someone's license over dietary disagreements such as this.

                    Iirc it’s that Smith has “prescribed” low Vitamin A to children.
                    Developing…
                    children….

                    Do you have children?

                    I do
                    And if that’s true of him
                    It’s probably not a bad idea for him to back off there

                    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7832048/

                    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221339842030083X

                    Reprobates gonna reprobate
                    But
                    Baseless data given authoritatively probably needs checks and balances

                    The further society drifts from the truth the more it will hate those who speak it.

                    SD

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      Jaffe @jjk_learning
                      last edited by

                      @jjk_learning said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                      It reads to me like a personal attempt to destroy Smith's livelihood.

                      I have no horse in this race, but that's exactly what that is lol.

                      All because of forum's change in direction.

                      B P J 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        bot-mod @Jaffe
                        last edited by

                        @Jaffe

                        It’s not a horse race so that’s understandable, me neither. But I’m not seeing any thought at all here.

                        A licensed physician has a livelihood before they may appear to sharply deviate from standards of conduct, may appear to commercialise that deviation and may appear to silence debate while continuing to stand under credentials wrapped in a PLLC. Many in the going public could probably use a hand making sense of something like that before they consider making drastic alterations to their dietary behaviour. Particularly on the tail end of a (metaphorical) Westworld on the internet. I wouldn’t know though, because I’m not making claims, conducting an investigation and bringing suit. Just musing.

                        A case like this is probably just an example in a much bigger conversation. Without anyone alluding to etiquette and dishonour of diseased on social media. What could be wrong with a formal chat if nothing’s wrong.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P
                          Peatful @Jaffe
                          last edited by Peatful

                          @Jaffe

                          somebody doesn’t complain and Smith gets a notification to appear before the Medical Examiners Board.

                          They vet the complaint or complaints.
                          There is an “investigation” prior to this process.
                          Therefore (and im speculating here because I know nothing about said case) this licensing agency or medical board - THEY have deemed there is something to look into.

                          This isn’t about Booboo on the RPF got his feelings hurt

                          This is the Board determining if anything needs addressing.
                          And if it’s about protecting children- I support it.

                          The further society drifts from the truth the more it will hate those who speak it.

                          SD

                          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            jjk_learning @Jaffe
                            last edited by

                            @Jaffe Agreed. Tattling on a man whose personality and dietary strategy they don't like to try to destroy his livelihood. Because an internet forum changed course to promote that dietary strategy.

                            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              bot-mod @jjk_learning
                              last edited by bot-mod

                              @jjk_learning

                              Your frame of mind does not appear conducive to learning jjk.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Hando-JinH
                                Hando-Jin
                                last edited by

                                Someone possibly losing their pretentious title of doctor for whatever reason isn't something to spend much time on. The ND quacks are as bad as the MD quacks.

                                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  bot-mod @Hando-Jin
                                  last edited by

                                  @Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                                  Someone possibly losing their pretentious title of doctor for whatever reason isn't something to spend much time on.

                                  Agreed.

                                  @Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                                  The ND quacks are as bad as the MD quacks.

                                  Agreed.

                                  But if there's a road to bring Dr Peat's rightful inquiry about the necessity or order of licensing, hierarchy and profession to the fore. It probably involves a stepping stone or two.

                                  Medicine should probably be closer to home than it is. But where's home. Exactly.

                                  JenniferJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JenniferJ
                                    Jennifer @bot-mod
                                    last edited by

                                    @ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                                    Medicine should probably be closer to home than it is.

                                    Agreed.

                                    @ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                                    But where's home. Exactly.

                                    The heart. IME, medicine is better insourced than outsourced.

                                    I have stood on a mountain of no’s for one yes. ~ B. Smith

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      bot-mod @Jennifer
                                      last edited by

                                      @Jennifer

                                      A Jennifer... Wild horses? (A reference to a quotation that landed.)

                                      JenniferJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        Jaffe @Peatful
                                        last edited by

                                        @Peatful said in New "Mission" of RPF:

                                        @Jaffe

                                        somebody doesn’t complain and Smith gets a notification to appear before the Medical Examiners Board.

                                        They vet the complaint or complaints.
                                        There is an “investigation” prior to this process.
                                        Therefore (and im speculating here because I know nothing about said case) this licensing agency or medical board - THEY have deemed there is something to look into.

                                        This isn’t about Booboo on the RPF got his feelings hurt

                                        This is the Board determining if anything needs addressing.
                                        And if it’s about protecting children- I support it.

                                        Lol since when do we trust the Board to make a just decision?

                                        I watched Dr. Paul Thomas in real time get his license suspended, lose his practice, and ultimately forced into retirement by the Board over his vaccine beliefs. Something we all align with. He wasn’t even anti-vaccine. Didn’t matter. The Board made his life hell. It’s all documented on his YouTube channel.

                                        We all know Board investigations are just making sure you’re inline with their status quo.

                                        Sending complaints of Garret to the Board has nothing to do with patient safety concern, but some vendetta stemming from the RPF drama earlier in the year.

                                        P B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P
                                          Peatful @Jaffe
                                          last edited by

                                          @Jaffe

                                          Yes
                                          Healthcare / the medical industrial complex is generally a cesspool of thought and action
                                          I know first hand- it is the sector in which I work

                                          Smith and RPF aside-
                                          Parents need to be encouraged to nourish- not restrict
                                          I don’t care if it’s keto, low vitamin A, vegan
                                          These are not good for children

                                          Not sure why one would support someone who is misguiding clients through pushing supplements and a subscription service of baseless science

                                          The further society drifts from the truth the more it will hate those who speak it.

                                          SD

                                          Hando-JinH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • BioEclecticB
                                            BioEclectic
                                            last edited by

                                            I would think that Smith appearing before the medical examiners board would be using the process as intended.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 72
                                            • 73
                                            • 74
                                            • 75
                                            • 76
                                            • 87
                                            • 88
                                            • 74 / 88
                                            • First post
                                              Last post