Rational Criticism
-
Here goes all the statements in the article I consider to be false. Do you agree or not? Pls explain your position.
Pls. place comments under each boxed statement in order to keep comments from getting confused with comments from another boxed statement.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
This post is deleted! -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
That was a lot of mis-truth’s
Mostly 1/2 truth's
Which are usually the things that trip people up and send them in the wrong directionIm not responding to each quote
Because honestly
The article and it’s author
It has no depthIt’s dogma / clickbait vs understanding
Even a broken clock is always right twice a day
-
Damn. I know plenty the screenshots jumped out at me as straw-men, or misrepresentations of Peat. It's not like Peat said "never eat nuts," or "apples are bad." I'm sure he had his preferences and thinking on many types of food.
As @Peatful said it is quite a bit of dogma/clickbait.
But it just confirms the basic assumption that there exists a Ray Peat diet, which everyone will deny. Ok, it isn't a diet, it's an approach to food. It appears to me Ray saw food as medicine. I would say he saw food as medicine because he was able to see so many health problems being caused by food. "Dose determines the poison" is the wisdom of Paracelsus but I'm sure Peat was keen on this, as he was seeing his now famous Peaty foods as offering restorative properties to a diseased / stressed / malnourished culture.
-
This post is deleted!
