The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy
-
@CO3 So first off, I don’t sell consultations anymore, I have no money to gain from sharing this information.
You can be mad and start resorting to insults about what I said that is fine, but it does not stop it from being the truth.
The Truth is stranger than Fiction, remember that.
Why is Taller Height instinctively desired? Can you answer that question? I can.
Why are traits like Blue Eyes and Blonde Hair instinctively desired? Can you answer that question? I can.
Why are all Presidents of the United States have a lineage that traces back to One King and Several Pharoahs? Can you answer that question? Because I can.
No one teaches people to desire these traits, it’s innate and instinctive.
Can you answer why any of these traits are subconsciously desired from all people? Because I can.
I am not promoting racism or anything of the Nature. I am simply offering the real explanation why the World is the way it is. If you don’t believe me, that’s ok, you can go ahead and believe in mainstream ideas and choose your own religion, but all roads lead back to what I am telling you right now and the amount of evidence I am writing in these posts is extremely extensive and is older than any mainstream religion or book you decide to follow.
White men marry Asian women all the time. White women date Black men all the time. I’ve met Asian men that were way more successful in life and with women than nearly any White man I’ve ever known.
Energy is an extremely important factor. Men can find themselves more attracted to a High-energy black woman and a High-Energy Spanish woman over a Low-energy White woman. What I said is the truth, but you shouldn’t let it bother you, your goal in life is to be the best version of yourself.
I myself, am not concerned at all, with the facts I just mentioned. Once you do start focusing on these facts, you begin to focus on your faults and flaws and engage yourself in self-destructive behavior. This information is not meant to destroy you, this information is meant to set you free from feelings that we all instinctively feel.
What I said can only bother you if you choose to let it bother you. You can be insecure about what I said, but like I said, we all have flaws and the only thing anyone can do - is become the best version of yourself.
-
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
After like the first 5 posts, @Truth and @Norwegian-Mugabe dont even argue with each other. Do not read their replies its literally like they talk into a translator and something else comes out for the other one and vica versa. Hilarious. Like here are my questions, the other gives "answers" to something else Would be great if they used a format like I did to actually argue. Until then, they are both not to be listened to. Thread got derailed with like 5 replies
Thanks for taking the time to perceive, think, and act.
-
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
Evolutionary fitness changes due to circumstances. The goal of evolution is not to be "Aryan"; the goal is to produce the most successful offspring's. The bar for an offspring to be successful is the lowest ever. The weak will prevail. The future is dysgenic.
Then if you think the goal of evolution is to produce the most successful offsprings, I will ask again: What about heterosis/hybrid vigor that sometimes happen when you mix races?
The IQ of a white person dropped 15 points in the last 100 years. A 15-point difference represents the difference between a high school science teacher and a security guard.
What's your evidence for this 15 points drop in this specific population?
Also, let's entertain for an instant that IQ is a 100% valid model: Why was there a Flynn effect before the supposedly more recent drop in IQ, that coincides with worse environmental conditions, diet, pollution, stress, huge increase in blue light exposure and the likes?
@Creuset said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
Have you ever read what Ray Peat said about eugenics and euthenics? Or how Mae Wan Ho debunked Darwinism, the Central dogma of molecular biology, the Modern evolutionary synthesis and other things mostly ignored by promoters of eugenics?
Why do so many people base ALL their opinions on what Ray said?.
I don't base all of my opinions on what Ray said, you can for example read what I've posted in other threads about anarco-capitalism, Natural Law or my defense of deductive methods in some contexts. Although it is clear to me that Ray was a very smart man, and that most of the things he said were very carefully researched, that's why I find it difficult to disagree with him on many topics, especially related to biology. I am an independent thinker, and I have no problem to admit even truths that would be emotionally hard to swallow for most people (what you kids would call "black pill").
The reason I agree with Ray on this specific topic is that there is ample evidence that genetic determinism is an outdated paradigm. And if you understand what the scientific method is, when your null hypothesis is invalidated by contradicting evidence, you change your paradigm with a new one that can accurately account for the new evidence. If you don't, then your approach is not based on science but on faith, definitely not the kind of reaction you would expect from someone with a supposedly high IQ. By the way, so far Norwegian Mugabe took my feedback and did not reject the evidence that I provided, and I respect that as this means that he is able to update his worldview based on evidence. I wonder how many of the other people claiming to be eugenists or nazis on this forum will be able to do so?
You can also try to provide all of the meta-analysis that you want to try to cling to the old paradigm, if they don't account for the new evidence, then they just provide an incomplete view of what's happening.
Eugenics obviously works. You can say its not ethical but cant deny that it works. It works for cows and horses it will work for humans as well
It probably works, otherwise breeders wouldn't use it, I'm just saying that this is an outdated model and method, and that new ones exist that are more effective, quicker, and also pose much less moral problems as we don't have to treat humans like animals.
To use a metaphor, the way I see most eugenics proponents in 2024 is that they try to defend fighting cancer with chemotherapy, when better methods exist. Sure, it works in some contexts to remove cancer cells, but it's like trying to kill an ant with a nuclear bomb. And like I said, eugenics also doesn't take into account current disastrous environmental degradation that's destroying our health globally.
I would expect that people that are intelligent would be able to understand all of this and be more nuanced in their thinking and hold a more complex view on this topic, especially since high IQ is supposedly usually associated with higher empathy and nuance. Actually, if you really have a high metabolic rate and a high IQ, or whatever you want to use to justify that you are a superior being, your high energy state would have you hold unconditionally altruistic views of humanity like Ray did, you would want to help and develop all of humanity, not castrate, sterilize or kill people based on their current circumstances.
Have you ever taken time to read the criticisms of IQ written by Nassim Taleb? And debunks of the Bell Curve?
Of course, Taleb is against IQ. [...] Taleb still believes the vaxx is working, and for a long time he actually thought Ukraine was winning the war (credit to him; he admitted his mistake a while ago).
Fair points, I don't have anything to say against that, even Nassim Taleb that I highly respect can be wrong about some things (even though I will need to take some time this week end to reread all of the IQ debate).
He has proven himself incapable of having a neutral viewpoint on sensitive topics. He is greatly influenced by his feelings. Perhaps that is the reason he has such a unique investing strategy with his friend Mark Spitznagel (his books are worth reading, btw). That being said, I liked his books, though I liked more of the "general knowledge" he shared. (It's also funny how he ignored vaxx producers having NO skin in the game and sucked up for them. Despite writing a whole books on this topic).
So I am white, I've been detected as a gifted individual when I was a child, I am 6'5, I have success with women and I am in the top 1% of income earners. Given that, I should have no problem with all of your claims about IQ and eugenics. I'm not saying this to brag, but to show that despite all of that, here I am arguing that this is bad science, even though this should be a good ego boost for me. And to stay nuanced, I am not here to deny that IQ isn't probably at least partially and in some contexts pointing to things related to intelligence, otherwise studies wouldn't probably find correlations, yet I don't conflate this map with the territory and I see flaws and weaknesses in the model. Same with nosology for mental health diseases and conditions, there are obviously methodological flaws and weaknesses when we define a set of symptoms as "schizophrenia" in an individual, this is a simplification of reality, especially since "schizophrenia" can have multiple different causes.
I have otherwise no problem with people having personal preferences. If you, or Norwegian Mugabe prefer to have blonde and blue-eyed wives and kids and want to preserve these phenotypes, or if you only want to live with white people on your territory, that's your right and I have nothing to say about that, and would even take your defense if you were ostracized for these choices.
However, if you start promoting eugenics, then I will just chime in to remind you that this is based on bad science. And if you try to promote aggressive measures such as sterilizing non-consenting individuals, I will of course manifest bluntly that I am against that and find it stupid.
Check out this great documentary about a Chinese man who wants to order some gravel in the Congo.
Everything that can be associated with having low iq can be seen here. No accountability, a lack of understanding of the consequences of ones actions, not recognizing good opportunities, stealing from their own employers. They are literally adult children. Goebbels couldn't have made a better propaganda video and the funny thing is that this is a documentary.
Africa is a weird continent. It's very hard to build ports on the coasts due to waters being too shallow, rivers cannot be navigated normally because of rapids, and horses did not exist on the continent. There were no efficient ways of travelling, thus there were much less cultural exchanges between tribes and less memetic emergence than in other places with more favorable geographic conditions. Europe provides good geographic conditions for memetic emergence, and really started to develop culturally when protestants challenged the centralized clergy, and that the printing press was invented so that people could read the Bible and verify claims made by the centralized clergy. Information could become decentralized and circulate much faster, that was the start of a cultural emergence and revolution. I think that all of this had much more influence than just IQ.
I am otherwise familiar with the Milwaukee Project and adoption of black kids by white families supposedly bringing only minor changes in IQ. That's not a topic that I've studied extensively so I will avoid making any claims for now, even though to my knowledge there aren't been studies made on more than 1 generation, which to me seems insufficient evidence to claim that IQ is fixed.
Did you know that Michael Levin, who works on morphogenetic fields, has been able to "cure" a fatal genetic defect in an animal model by using bioelectricity?
My grandparents use a copper rod that send small frequencies of electricity through them to heal themselves (they hold it in both hands and its connected to a machine). Different frequencies for different problems. Have no idea if its working or not. But interesting nonetheless. Will check this guy out. Thanks.
On a side note, Levin is working with planarian flatworms because they are basically immortal and have endless regenerative abilities (you can cut them into different pieces and the pieces will just develop and regenerate into individual flatworms). He explains that they accumulate a lot of mutations that should make their genomes very unstable, and even have weird irregular number of chromosomes, yet they don't develop any health problems and keep their regenerative abilities and immortality as long as they are not killed. Again, more evidence that genetic determinism is an outdated paradigm.
-
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
After like the first 5 posts, @Truth and @Norwegian-Mugabe dont even argue with each other. Do not read their replies its literally like they talk into a translator and something else comes out for the other one and vica versa. Hilarious. Like here are my questions, the other gives "answers" to something else Would be great if they used a format like I did to actually argue. Until then, they are both not to be listened to. Thread got derailed with like 5 replies
Thanks for taking the time to perceive, think, and act.
You're still emotionally affected , weeks have gone by, try to free yourself from these lingering negative emotions
You thanked a guy for "perceive, think, act" , who started his comment by saying that he greatly appreciated this garbage post that promotes hate, division, and choosing to create children between "whites" only, based on narratives rather than instincts, experiences and personal preferences, and that promotes the ostracization of non-white people
you thanked him because it makes you feel a little better that someone is saying things that you perceive as confirming your bias, when his comment doesn't change anything to your confused comments from previous weeks that I commented on
-
@Peatly said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
You are either setting yourself up for a fall or you are setting the forum up. Either way it won't end well.
Being a paranoid schizophrenic is not peaty.
You are not as well informed as you think
-
@Truth said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
After like the first 5 posts, @Truth and @Norwegian-Mugabe dont even argue with each other. Do not read their replies its literally like they talk into a translator and something else comes out for the other one and vica versa. Hilarious. Like here are my questions, the other gives "answers" to something else Would be great if they used a format like I did to actually argue. Until then, they are both not to be listened to. Thread got derailed with like 5 replies
Thanks for taking the time to perceive, think, and act.
You're still emotionally affected , weeks have gone by, try to free yourself from these lingering negative emotions
You thanked a guy for "perceive, think, act" , who started his comment by saying that he greatly appreciated this garbage post that promotes hate, division, and choosing to create children between "whites" only, based on narratives rather than instincts, experiences and personal preferences, and that promotes the ostracization of non-white people
you thanked him because it makes you feel a little better that someone is saying things that you perceive as confirming your bias, when his comment doesn't change anything to your confused comments from previous weeks that I commented on
It's not about us at all, believe it or not. It's about how he perceived how the exchange went with you two. And he spent a lot of time opining relevantly to other posts on this thread, and made his last comment about how you two could make this thread more meaningful in terms of exchanging opposing ideas.
Learn to be a little more self-effacing. Then again, I would not be surprised if you would make a retort back at me. Spend more time learning bioenergetics in this space, instead of using up your energy on meaningless back and forths.
-
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Truth said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
After like the first 5 posts, @Truth and @Norwegian-Mugabe dont even argue with each other. Do not read their replies its literally like they talk into a translator and something else comes out for the other one and vica versa. Hilarious. Like here are my questions, the other gives "answers" to something else Would be great if they used a format like I did to actually argue. Until then, they are both not to be listened to. Thread got derailed with like 5 replies
Thanks for taking the time to perceive, think, and act.
You're still emotionally affected , weeks have gone by, try to free yourself from these lingering negative emotions
You thanked a guy for "perceive, think, act" , who started his comment by saying that he greatly appreciated this garbage post that promotes hate, division, and choosing to create children between "whites" only, based on narratives rather than instincts, experiences and personal preferences, and that promotes the ostracization of non-white people
you thanked him because it makes you feel a little better that someone is saying things that you perceive as confirming your bias, when his comment doesn't change anything to your confused comments from previous weeks that I commented on
It's not about us at all, believe it or not. It's about how he perceived how the exchange went with you two. And he spent a lot of time opining relevantly to other posts on this thread, and made his last comment about how you two could make this thread more meaningful in terms of exchanging opposing ideas.
Learn to be a little more self-effacing. Then again, I would not be surprised if you would make a retort back at me. Spend more time learning bioenergetics in this space, instead of using up your energy on meaningless back and forths.
You replied to this last specific part of his comment, you didn't reply to his entire comment, which implies that you were thanking him for "perceive, think, act" only for this last part,
so it's obvious it's in relation to that since you're butthurt and multiple times you've commented similar things about people saying things you perceived as confirming your bias on me.You and people like the one who made the original post, you dont want "meaningfull exchanges", you want to write your non sense without being asked questions or contradicting your dubious claims.
These "bioenergetic ideas" don't seem to help you or the OP not make dumb claims, and not to hate people who don't hurt others, the OP claims that his "eugenic" garbage ideas that promote hatred, division, ostracization of non-white people based on narratives rather than our instincts, are partly bioenergetic based, which tells you all you need to know about teenagers and/or adults, who try to legitimize their own low energy and/or lingering negative emotions driven tendencies with some theoric mêmes such as "high metabolism" " better structure" "optimal blood sugar metabolism"
What have all these bioenergetic theories got you if you say yourself that you haven't yet reached your ideal of "optimal sugar metabolism" after years on the forum, and you say that's what's missing from the ideas of Raymond and other influencers?
-
@Truth said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
forths
This is a new low for you. Not only incapable of comprehending, but putting words in my mouth, and conflating things. No wonder you can't stop preaching from your high perch. Boorish!
-
@Kilgore I also support abortion. These people are hillaorusly unreasonable. They also jump to rash conclusions. When I mention eugenics, I am mostly thinking about improving and multiplying the amount of great people. I do not care that much about the lower classes(blacks and women).
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore I also support abortion. These people are hillaorusly unreasonable. They also jump to rash conclusions. When I mention eugenics, I am mostly thinking about improving and multiplying the amount of great people. I do not care that much about the lower classes(blacks and women).
Have fun multiplying with "great" men as you dont Care much about women.
-
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
I have seen that you tried to argue with this person before. Unfortunately, it seems impossible to do so. He is incapable of not having an emotional meltdown about any topic whether race and IQ or religion. Does not answer or disprove any claim you make its crazy. His intellectual level is neurotic Charlie.
Not only incapable of comprehending
Yes. Unbelievable. His reply's are literally a waste.
Spend more time learning bioenergetics in this space, instead of using up your energy on meaningless back and forths.
You are right. It is a waste of time. Lets just talk about our temperatures. I have been raising mine, currently chilling at 99.2F. Sipping some warm milk with honey and cinnamon.
"emotional meltdown" I respond to guys who either write hateful comments, or guys who react to simple questions with hate, so I care less about hurting your feelings. On the "New mission on RPF" post, Yerrag admitted he was wrong, and did an "emotional meltdown" after I asked him about his fictional ideal of "optimal blood metabolism", which he thought he had a very good understanding of, and mentioned that Ray Peat had told him the same thing in an email, whereas Yerrag said that what Raymond and other influencers are missing is how to achieve this "optimal sugar metabolism" in a practical way, so it hurt his feelings that I pointed out that his idea is just fictional and that he's never experienced it.
Norwegian's posts are nonsense, because he's totally confused about his own ideas, he says that well-being isn't the highest goal in life, that the highest goal in life is art, and that Raymond shares his ideas, whereas his signature says that the goal of art is a feeling of serenity and wonder over the long term. So why does he think that serenity and wonder are the highest values in life? Because obviously in his experience these are the feelings that he prefers and that make him feel the best, so this implies that he measures what is optimal by the degree of long-term well-being that it arouses in him and/or the white men with whom he wants to multiply, and that his highest goal in life is well-being even if he's totally confused about that.
Is being "jacked" necessarily associated with a higher degree of Wonder, serenity, well-being in the long term? No, the majority of children aren't jacked, and they generally have more "Wonder" than adults. Are jacked women more serene than non-jacked women? No, of the few jacked women I've seen, they seem to more stressed and less well mentally than non-jacked women. are jacked men more serene and do they have more Wonder? No, the majority of "jacked" men i have Seen have less Wonder than non-jacked men, women and children
So it's clear that Yerrag and norwegian are confused about their ideas on these subjects I mentioned, have tendencies to mental illness, in addition to hating and/or promoting hatred of people who have done no harm to others
If you greatly appreciate this post despite norwegian's common disdain and hatred of people who aren't "white" and women, including on this post, you are confused and potentially have tendencies to mental illness, it's okay to say that from your experience you've observed differences between different people, citing fictional narratives to incite and legitimize disdain and hatred of non-white people and women, and reproduction only between whites driven by narratives, it is problematic, it promotes division, disdain and/or hatred of people who do no harm to others until proven otherwise, and it promotes a state of mental slavery, where we choose who we have children with based on narratives rather than our individual instincts and preferences
-
@Truth you got it all wrong. The Greeks did not much "care" about women but look at what they achieved. The coming Aryan eugenic supercycle cannot be stopped, and it is all about improving Aryan men towards new peaks that lesser classes can only dream of.
-
@Truth said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
emotional meltdown" I respond to guys who either write hateful comments, or guys who react to simple questions with hate, so I care less about hurting your feelings. On the "New mission on RPF" post, Yerrag admitted he was wrong, and did an "emotional meltdown" after I asked him about his fictional ideal of "optimal blood metabolism", which he thought he had a very good understanding of, and mentioned that Ray Peat had told him the same thing in an email, whereas Yerrag said that what Raymond and other influencers are missing is how to achieve this "optimal sugar metabolism" in a practical way, so it hurt his feelings that I pointed out that his idea is just fictional and that he's never experienced it.
How you spin things reminds me is simply beyond me. Or is that as I said of you an utter lack of comprehension and worse, delusional psychosis?
Go on, retreat into your own conjured up make-believe fantasy world. We're watching you spiral and disintegrate. Hope your mom intervenes as you are one sad miserable miscreant.
-
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Truth said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
emotional meltdown" I respond to guys who either write hateful comments, or guys who react to simple questions with hate, so I care less about hurting your feelings. On the "New mission on RPF" post, Yerrag admitted he was wrong, and did an "emotional meltdown" after I asked him about his fictional ideal of "optimal blood metabolism", which he thought he had a very good understanding of, and mentioned that Ray Peat had told him the same thing in an email, whereas Yerrag said that what Raymond and other influencers are missing is how to achieve this "optimal sugar metabolism" in a practical way, so it hurt his feelings that I pointed out that his idea is just fictional and that he's never experienced it.
How you spin things reminds me is simply beyond me. Or is that as I said of you an utter lack of comprehension and worse, delusional psychosis?
Go on, retreat into your own conjured up make-believe fantasy world. We're watching you spiral and disintegrate. Hope your mom intervenes as you are one sad miserable miscreant.
What did i spin?
-
That is not my problem. I'm not your shrink. Go find one.
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Truth you got it all wrong. The Greeks did not much "care" about women but look at what they achieved. The coming Aryan eugenic supercycle cannot be stopped, and it is all about improving Aryan men towards new peaks that lesser classes can only dream of.
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore I also support abortion. These people are hillaorusly unreasonable. They also jump to rash conclusions. When I mention eugenics, I am mostly thinking about improving and multiplying the amount of great people. I do not care that much about the lower classes(blacks and women).
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Optimal Penis Cleaning Regimen:
Yet, I want people who are sculptured like Greek statues. Kitty Blomfield and Dinkov are great examples of people who becomes better looking and healthier through gaining muscle mass. Muscle mass have many advantages, most of all an increase in BMR, betterment in hormonal profile, and higher aesthetic value.
That's what you said when I asked you about your "last Aryan Babylon" where everyone is "jacked" a few weeks ago, you mentionned Kitty Blomfield( a woman), so you included women in your fantasy, and now you're saying that in your Aryan fantasy, you mostly Care to multiply only between "great" white men, and that you don't care much about "lower classes" such as "women and blacks", another contradiction and confusion
Have fun sharing photos of men's behinds and multiplying only between men
-
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
That is not my problem. I'm not your shrink. Go find one.
It is if that's what you're claiming and criticizing.
Would you prefer direct quotes of your comments that I mentioned, about your fictional idea of "optimal blood sugar" and the fact that you think the practical application of this fictional idea is what's missing from the ideas of Ray Peat and other influencers?
-
Sure, why not? I know what I wrote.
I won't waste time proving you wrong. What is written is there for the record.
Read them again to make sure you first understood whar is said, and when you are certain of your understanding of it, then bring it out.
Otherwise, you make yourself look even more of a fool.
For the humor of it, I will be patient with you and explain to you my simple English that I try best to be concise and brief.
I may regret doing this but I'm hopeful you are not going to engage in roundabout ways of distracting me from the subject of our discussion.
-
you clearly said that the practical application of an "optimal sugar metabolism" is what's missing from Raymond Peat's ideas, and didn't answer when I asked if you reached it practically, and now you claim you reached it through Ray Peat's ideas, non sense.
That's what you said weeks ago, either you're confused, you're lying, or you don't know how to express your ideas:
@yerrag said in Banned from RP forum : Can you do better than this.:
RPF, as I said in previous a previous, has been a failure. Its main pillar is that optimal sugar metabolism is the key to health. Yet the site is vexed and stuck in not knowing how to make its members transform themselves from being poor sugar metabolizers into optimal sugar metabolizers. Ray Peat spoke only about the superiority of having optimal sugar metabolism, bit never spoke how to go about making that transformation. The site could have provided that a workable blueprint on how to go about that transformation, thus enabling many members towards the path to metabolic health. But it never got that going. There was a member named Cirion. He was piling on weight taking in lots of sugar because he believed sugar was good, but his body did not metabolize sugar well, and so he suddenly dropped out never to be heard from again. We don't really know if is still alive.
I feel charlie would be better off refocusing the website towards making the transformation to optimal sugar metabolism be a key goal before he embarked on his anti-peat mission.
-
@yerrag On another matter you criticized thesir and Christians, saying that most of them were slaves:
@yerrag said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@TheSir said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Evidently any possible hope for us humans, as well as the world itself, can be found in nothing lesser than God himself. Rather than learned helplessness, this is lucidity given by 10 000 years of hard evidence.
All are helpless. In need of saving! By an external all-[powerful entity in Christ Jesus the Messiah. And very hopeful but hopeless in the infinity of time that Jesus will come and save them. Faith in the non-existent that is to come keeps them as eternal slaves to the powers that be as they die and let their children, and their children's children, keep this nonsense going on while the Zionists and their sycophants keep getting more entrenched in feeding off this brainwashed mass of humans.
It's better off to be born without this brainwashing and abide by natural law, and to be guided by humanistic philosophies such as Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism, Zoroastrianism, and Manichaeism. For that may still bring true hope that society will once again develop and not degrade as the government is formed by meritocracy where public servants are respected because they are raised on ethical standards and shame exists as a code exists that serves the common good. This is love expressed in the highest levels of society.
Yet the comment you wrote below seems to manifest notifiable slave tendencies in the way you address to Brad as your guide:
@yerrag said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@Peatful said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Why…
Does…
He…
Stay?Honestly
Needs to tell them to fuck off.I don't take being a member here lightly, and I appreciate the welcome door here you have set for all. Your guiding hand speaks in the way you have designed the site, and in how your benign presence is expressed in your seeming absence.
On top of that you talk about how it's better to be guided by humanist philosophies, you don't criticize the OP's trash post, yet you thank kilgor for "perceive,think, act" because he says negative things about me, whereas he started by saying that he greatly enjoyed this garbage post, and I criticized the post