New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User
-
@ThinPicking no it's on you, i provide RCTs you share fairy tales. i know ray peat well enough to know that he seldom if ever provides real empirical evidence of his claims and yet he always acts as if he's doing modern science. he claims avocado's are toxic based on a study on avocado oil in rats where only a liver marker was measured. nevermind the body of evidence demonstrating protection against liver disease in humans. he didn't do this just one time. his articles are non stop pseudo-science of this kind. animal studies, in vitro studies, made up stories ('i grew an inch', 'william blake could count the nerve endings in his temple better than an electron microscope', ...), misinterpretations of stories ('large hypothalami in taxi drivers means their work made them grow that'), ... he even did craploads of mechanistic science, ironically. my IQ was measured and would allow me into mensa. everything you write is arrogant and does nothing but beat around the bush
-
@doomerzoomer3 said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
you cunt
@doomerzoomer3 said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
clever yet nasty
@doomerzoomer3 said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
would allow me into mensa
Attention is all you need little boy.
Read Revelation.
And don't worry, I'm not afraid of avocados.
-
I do know the numbers, 90% of US Jews vote democrat, Jews have spearheaded all degenerate and subversive movements (lgbtq, feminism) and industries (usury banking, porn) in the west for hundreds of years.
You should read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and measure it against history, you’ll be shocked if objective in the slightest.
Haven’t read what you’ve said in here because I can’t be bothered, but I’m assuming by your username that you’re a Christian fundamentalist of some sort?
-
@RawGoatMilk88 you didn’t read my last comment directly toward you that you replied to, or my other comments in the thread?
-
I only read the part directed at me, are you a Christian?
-
@Lovesickhs18 I'm not a mod anymore so your option is only to block such users now. You can see the quality of discourse in the rest of this thread, but this is what the admin wants, free speech. Though I recall him wanting high quality discourse, which seems impossible this way.
-
The Tyrant Karen is gone, hooray!
-
@RawGoatMilk88 Yo do know that many original users had lovely creative names referencing Hitler and racism and that your beloved admin banned them for "trolling" right? The "free speech" admin is a child about the whole thing and acts tough while I was open about my methods.
-
Still some gold in here NShan.
Maybe the purge in the beginning was for the sign up being easier, or stranger, for there being no tone about the place.
And maybe. Just maybe. There's some truth in this. That may have something to do with their health. I don't know.
@ThinPicking said in *****:
But attempt can be made of this and other obscenity to talk it in to dust. It's only logic really. If a person won't engage in that or present constructive retort to a previous instance. They're bannable. Try and wall them off without doing this. And something bad will probably happen.
-
@doomerzoomer3 said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
it's RCTs
IDK why you're waiting for an RCT to tell you not to jump off cliffs... You don't need an RCT for everything if you have a brain - especially when results can take 20 years to manifest.
you cunt
It's more like a cry for help than an insult.
ironically Kyle Mamounis was put in the cuck shed of the blog author because he refused to debate publicly and removed his own twitter comments when he got schooled
This fallacy won't work in a court of law; a debate class; or with me.
Address the merit or shortcoming of an argument at hand, not the ethos fallacy of whether an author has made errors in other arguments.
don't give a shit about potential exceptions
In a nation where the majority of single white women vote liberal, you definitely give a "shit," unless you're that committed to following the footsteps of the greatest Jew-skeptic.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/07/books.booksnews -
Only reason I don’t take this place serious at all is how freely you let inflammatory posters run amuck.
Nigger this.
Jew that.Superior aryan race here.
Inferior (insert race) thereWomen barely being seen as people.
Just say you (admins, mods) want to cultivate the alternative health version of stormfront so we can all stop pretending this is some Ray Peat haven.
-
@Jaffe thank you.
-
@RawGoatMilk88 Gotcha. Yes, I am a Christian.
-
Have you familiarized yourself with the Talmud at all?
-
@NotShanalotte said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
Have your say by leaving a yes or no.
are you fucking serious?
if whoever runs/owns this site can't make a decision about banning shitposters and neonazis then they should turn it over to an adult
I doubt many here find democracy a good solution to anything
-
@Jaffe said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
Only reason I don’t take this place serious at all is how freely you let inflammatory posters run amuck.
Welcome to "modern" "civilisation". It's probably not a good idea to expect ordo ab chao. So what then.
@Jaffe said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
Nigger this.
Jew that.Superior aryan race here.
Inferior (insert race) thereWomen barely being seen as people.
If a person can muster it. Maybe they can love a dysfunctional neighbour enough to make it hurt. And be very careful about why.
@Jaffe said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
Just say you (admins, mods) want to cultivate the alternative health version of stormfront so we can all stop pretending this is some Ray Peat haven.
Take it "seriously" and maybe it can be so.
-
@Hando-Jin said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
I doubt many here find democracy a good solution to anything
If that's true it's probably because they were never told what democracy actually is. And never strolled to find out.
I'm not done with that. But referenda and elections are just instruments. And I don't like the sound personally.
-
I'm not aware that's required reading. And I've read a lot of things I wouldn't adhere to. Maybe you should reconsider your language.
I'm not religious personally. But there seem to be a lot of people who are.
-
@RawGoatMilk88 unrelated to making an issue about whether or not this forum’s admin is Jewish.
-
Not sure what you’re getting at here, what was wrong with my language?