New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User
-
Seed oils.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7iXPgh4ZeEDa Jooos.
Jewish group profiling could work if they were a homogenized culture. But, they are as varied in their political alignments as Christians. Orthodox anti-zionists and pacifists, secular jewish liberals who fall all over the map from anti-west-anti-zionism, to anti-west-pro-zionism, to pro-west-pro-zionism; I've met neonazi Jews on telegram, and one of the most popular proto-nazi anti-Anglo voices in post-WW1 Germany was a Jew (that had continental Jewish support), for which the German anti-Semites decried as fundamentally Semitic extremism for failing to see the eternal brotherhood of the Germans and Anglos (haha, they should've listened to their Jewish nazis instead). 80,000 Jews fought for Germany in WW1. 80-100,000 fought for Germany in WW2, with 5-10,000 Jewish Nazi party members.Are there likely Jewish white collar elites powerbrokering the west away? Do some Jews have an explicit anti-west bias? Are there some jewcy ugly facts like the Jewish mob running NYC in the 20th century? Sure, and I can point out as many culpable "christian"/"aryan"/etc westerners exploiting Western countries anyway they can, as well.
All in all it becomes a moot point when you find out a a Jew did a thing and was successful.
I know a ton of messianic (christian) Jews, who are very pro-westerner, and still start businesses or websites... go figure.
Getting some conservative white Christian folks I know, to do something productive with their wealth and multiply it, is like pulling teeth - ah, cultural inclinations... I wonder who else has cultural inclinations...
-
I requested you constructively dispute those pieces for a footing to try, in context. And generate a conversation. You may arrive at another six, a series of conditional statements about other micronutrients, behaviour and a desire to walk off on a hunch. Instead you're whinging like an unloved and maladapted child. Thank you. And still. Whenever you're ready.
'Seed Oil Sophistry' is probably worthy of a knock. Sure enough, you'll find the single issue types covering a foothold to sell something. Or worse. Bioenergetics is a touch more wholistic than that. And I'm not saying they're 'bad', they're just tired, and petulant. Like you. And me in a few days, if I stop minding my behaviour towards myself.
And obviously your attempt at ze joos is hilarious. Personally I'd want an ethnic descriptor to entertain it, not a religious one. You do sound stunted in IQ, potentially prone to sleaze, grift, and subversion. I wish you the best of luck in rising above it. Chappo. Stick around.
-
Yes, reinstate.
Stop abusing authority and acting like Charlie, it’s not that serious.
-
90% of US Jews vote democrat.
-
@RawGoatMilk88 idk the numbers but the majority of single white women vote democrat
doomerzoomer's threshold for not liking or accepting a thing (as well as most anti-semites, or anti other things like anti-white, too) is only according to whatever preconceived bias they already have. I don't disagree that a majority of Jews are liberal, simply that a majority of Jews are also not in a linear or cohesive cabal.
Clearly, conservative white men will not make a threshold (if they're 1% reasonable) of eliminating white girls from their dating pool.
Zionist conspiracy theory to force global circumcision - ok lets argue...
but for whatever retarded reason twatter-males exclaim Brad is Jewish, as if it's an a priori bad thing - "a Jew supports a free speech platform built around Ray Peat's legacy! Conspiracy!" -
@NotShanalotte I knew this was about to be an issue for this site. You can't have an open forum for Bioenergtics & have all the racist peaters too. I think maybe have an option to 'quarantine' a user or something, or 'mute' a user.
If you can't do such a delicate thing, definitely ban him; this forum is a better place to welcome people to Ray Peat then twitter, which is more disjointed anyways as a platform, & is more open for open racism anyways.
-
it's RCTs you cunt
ironically Kyle Mamounis was put in the cuck shed of the blog author because he refused to debate publicly and removed his own twitter comments when he got schooledjews are a major threat because they're clever yet nasty. don't give a shit about potential exceptions
-
@ThinPicking no it's on you, i provide RCTs you share fairy tales. i know ray peat well enough to know that he seldom if ever provides real empirical evidence of his claims and yet he always acts as if he's doing modern science. he claims avocado's are toxic based on a study on avocado oil in rats where only a liver marker was measured. nevermind the body of evidence demonstrating protection against liver disease in humans. he didn't do this just one time. his articles are non stop pseudo-science of this kind. animal studies, in vitro studies, made up stories ('i grew an inch', 'william blake could count the nerve endings in his temple better than an electron microscope', ...), misinterpretations of stories ('large hypothalami in taxi drivers means their work made them grow that'), ... he even did craploads of mechanistic science, ironically. my IQ was measured and would allow me into mensa. everything you write is arrogant and does nothing but beat around the bush
-
@doomerzoomer3 said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
you cunt
@doomerzoomer3 said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
clever yet nasty
@doomerzoomer3 said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
would allow me into mensa
Attention is all you need little boy.
Read Revelation.
And don't worry, I'm not afraid of avocados.
-
I do know the numbers, 90% of US Jews vote democrat, Jews have spearheaded all degenerate and subversive movements (lgbtq, feminism) and industries (usury banking, porn) in the west for hundreds of years.
You should read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and measure it against history, you’ll be shocked if objective in the slightest.
Haven’t read what you’ve said in here because I can’t be bothered, but I’m assuming by your username that you’re a Christian fundamentalist of some sort?
-
@RawGoatMilk88 you didn’t read my last comment directly toward you that you replied to, or my other comments in the thread?
-
I only read the part directed at me, are you a Christian?
-
@Lovesickhs18 I'm not a mod anymore so your option is only to block such users now. You can see the quality of discourse in the rest of this thread, but this is what the admin wants, free speech. Though I recall him wanting high quality discourse, which seems impossible this way.
-
The Tyrant Karen is gone, hooray!
-
@RawGoatMilk88 Yo do know that many original users had lovely creative names referencing Hitler and racism and that your beloved admin banned them for "trolling" right? The "free speech" admin is a child about the whole thing and acts tough while I was open about my methods.
"Bear...Seek...Seek...Lest."
-
Still some gold in here NShan.
Maybe the purge in the beginning was for the sign up being easier, or stranger, for there being no tone about the place.
And maybe. Just maybe. There's some truth in this. That may have something to do with their health. I don't know.
@ThinPicking said in *****:
But attempt can be made of this and other obscenity to talk it in to dust. It's only logic really. If a person won't engage in that or present constructive retort to a previous instance. They're bannable. Try and wall them off without doing this. And something bad will probably happen.
-
@doomerzoomer3 said in New Poll: You, the People Decide the Fate of a User:
it's RCTs
IDK why you're waiting for an RCT to tell you not to jump off cliffs... You don't need an RCT for everything if you have a brain - especially when results can take 20 years to manifest.
you cunt
It's more like a cry for help than an insult.
ironically Kyle Mamounis was put in the cuck shed of the blog author because he refused to debate publicly and removed his own twitter comments when he got schooled
This fallacy won't work in a court of law; a debate class; or with me.
Address the merit or shortcoming of an argument at hand, not the ethos fallacy of whether an author has made errors in other arguments.
don't give a shit about potential exceptions
In a nation where the majority of single white women vote liberal, you definitely give a "shit," unless you're that committed to following the footsteps of the greatest Jew-skeptic.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/07/books.booksnews -
Only reason I don’t take this place serious at all is how freely you let inflammatory posters run amuck.
Nigger this.
Jew that.Superior aryan race here.
Inferior (insert race) thereWomen barely being seen as people.
Just say you (admins, mods) want to cultivate the alternative health version of stormfront so we can all stop pretending this is some Ray Peat haven.
-
@Jaffe thank you.
-
@RawGoatMilk88 Gotcha. Yes, I am a Christian.
