New "Mission" of RPF
-
William. Assuming that is you and you snoop here. I couldn't have put it better myself. Excellent
Also appreciate your candour in sharing personal struggle. And Evan fielded it well. That will be useful to some people. Being a "slim" dude has its own set of drawbacks, but go for it. Whatever you need to order that thyroid.
I still can't endorse the "protocol" or idea it will go "mainstream". But you can walk any line you like at the end of the day.
-
BTW, I don't know if you noticed a small, but historical event. Haidut recently posted a new study on his site, on Twitter/X, and here, BUT... not on RPF...
It seems that he abandoned RPF for good...A little learning is a dangerous thing ;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring :
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again.
~Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism -
This post is deleted! -
@Kvirion That should help thin that beat scene.
I hope Georgi creates an interactive site with new interivews! -
Controlled demolition of the RPF has succeeded.
-
@Regina said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I hope Georgi creates an interactive site with new interivews!
Yes, I hope for this too!
Moreover, as @Insomniac, I also hope that Haidut will stay here and even engage more with this forum.
-
-
Blossom’s posting photos again.
“I lost 77 pounds. It took 7 years but I’m okay with that because I did it in a healthy and sustainable way.”^ Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think this looks healthy at all (she’s 54)
-
Now they’re noticing that low vitamin A people are losing their outer eyebrows...
this is in addition to the grey hair and excessive gas
-
@Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:
But years ago when people were talking on other forums about how obnoxious he was, somebody talked about his father and posted and all the kooky metaphysical ideas he was into. Just completely insane stuff. I think it's simply a case of the apple not falling far from the tree. Nobody born to someone like that is coming out normal.
Good day Mr "Charlie". I see you're flapping around looking for a more palatable horse to back. That's understandable.
Just a very friendly reminder for you. We're not all so maladapted. That domain is coming home one way or another. You're simply labouring under the patience of saints right now (somewhere beyond this place).
Have a nice evening chap.
-
my god, get the funeral paid already
-
-
yuck
but when your primary goal is to lose weight just so you can post pictures of yourself on instagram to keep up with every other numbskull woman, I guess it's justifiable.
Willing to bet she smells like an old man.
-
@wrl said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Archived page of a fresh post with an pro-A stance.
How long will it stay up for‽(Archived rpf webpage)
https://archive.ph/j900lScreenshots of post excerpts...
Oh Mary, turn off the fucking caps lock. Anyone who uses the term thrive shouldn't be allowed on the internet anymore. I wonder if she even knew who Ray Peat was, as per the forum name.
-
There is going to be a Medical Board hearing for Dr. Smith May 9. I will post the results.
-
Thank you Matt
-
@Matt1951 said in New "Mission" of RPF:
There is going to be a Medical Board hearing for Dr. Smith May 9. I will post the results.
What is your goal for the complaint you filed with the board? And what is the basis of the complaint?
-
Why does the board exist. And what is the point of licensing.
-
I read that post but don't really understand the basis of the complaint. That Smith is endangering children? It reads to me like a personal attempt to destroy Smith's livelihood.
This same logic from that post could be used to go after someone who promotes discarding "essential fatty acid" PUFAs or anything else.
I suppose the board will be able to handle it however they feel appropriate but I disagree strongly with the idea of going after someone's license over dietary disagreements such as this.
-
@jjk_learning said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I suppose the board will be able to handle it however they feel appropriate but I disagree strongly with the idea of going after someone's license over dietary disagreements such as this.
Yes, they will. That's the point. To ask structured questions that require structured responses. On record.
The issue is a bit more nuanced than "dietary disagreements". But you're entitled to indignation at the thought of it.
