New "Mission" of RPF
-
Seems like Charlie will be banning user DivingWater very soon even though he is a forum supporter. This is for the offense of disagreeing with user mosaic01
-
Just curious, has anybody ever met Charlie in person? Or been to his health-food store?
-
@C-Mex is his store a real location? i thought the address is a PO box
-
@risingfire said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Seems like Charlie will be banning user DivingWater very soon even though he is a forum supporter. This is for the offense of disagreeing with user mosaic01
Freedom of speech is dead on the "new and improved" RP Forum. Newsflash for Charlie: you can't be both MAGA and a fascist at the same time.
-
-
Maybe you're right. I didn't know that 'store' belonged to him, or that that advertising on the Forum was his business. So recently I visited the website and it bills itself as a 'family business' and I got a different impression, like a physical store that had been in existence for 'generations'. I wonder how long he's had the business.
Another reason I thought he had a physical store was that he claims that he and 'his business' had been physically threatened because of what he is doing to the RPF, but I guess I misunderstood that as well,
-
@S-Holmes said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Newsflash for Charlie: you can't be both MAGA and a fascist at the same time.
This might depend on what he currently considers "great".
-
@C-Mex it doesn't look like it has been around for long, he also ran SuchLabs for a while that was advertised on there, a kock off of haiduts store. Both of them had a PO box as an address see here
-
@ThinPicking COTS software isn't always compatible with GOTS.
-
@S-Holmes and you can't pretend your forum stands in the spirit of Ray Peat while quashing any dissent or questions.
-
Oh, I haven't been paying attention. Charlie is claiming that RP gave him his blessing in an e-mail before he started the RPF, but invokes his godliness and inherent trustworthiness as a reason not to produce the e-mail exchange pronto in order to dispel any contentions that RP did not approve of the RPF.
-
@C-Mex
-
@C-Mex
He also completely ignored the most important part of the inquiry from @TheSir.
This POS is just taunting and gaslighting day after day.
ICANN's procedure to relinquish the domain isn't even that expensive or complicated. And it makes subsequent invocation for attempt at similar registration easier still. Maybe you should stop goading David.
-
@risingfire said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@S-Holmes and you can't pretend your forum stands in the spirit of Ray Peat while quashing any dissent or questions.
Yep!
-
Wow I just found the thread you guys are talking about... just when you thought things couldn’t get any worse over there! https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/ray-peat-gave-me-his-blessing-to-start-the-ray-peat-forum-full-permission-was-granted.52692/
“Man of integrity” hahahahahaha
So we’re just supposed to take his word for it that Ray gave permission, no proof required... question it and you get banned of course.
-
@ilovethesea
Uh huh. Maybe it is time to quit giving this cretin any sense of importance and let the new Ray Peat Forum stand for the absolute joke it has become. -
of course he is willing to lie that Ray endorsed his trash forum when Danny already posted screenshots showing Ray had no clue who is running the forum. Charlie will ban you if you ask for the emails though, he's such a good and honest man it's an insult to suggest he has to prove anything.
-
@C-Mex on the contrary, he needs to be exposed. Obviously this thread is getting to him or he wouldn’t feel the need to post that fake statement today.
-
Yes, you are right. I"m just frustrated with the situation.
-
Pretty soon he will have banned anyone who dare question him. I would suppose there are any number of members on there who hesitate to speak out for that very reason, trying to figure out if there is any reason to stay anymore.
