Haidut is poisoning our balls with dogshit solvents?! these solvents instead mog? find out in the next episode of dragonball Z
-
@jamezb46
Topical lanolin (which Haidut had written a lot about as well) as precursors to sex steroids strongly does what you described, too.
In the short term at least. In the medium term the effects and result turn very bad and sour for reasons I cannot explain but only report.
Also, the major curveball of DHEA use even at only 5-8mg per day is its turning to estrogenic dominance after a few months and super strongly especially after its cessation as some kind of derailment.
Some peeps may be exempt from such effects, and or ameliorated wrt this by concurrent use of AIs. Dunno.
Do you have any thoughts and ideas on that? -
@CrumblingCookie said in Haidut is poisoning our balls with dogshit solvents?! these solvents instead mog? find out in the next episode of dragonball Z:
Topical lanolin (which Haidut had written a lot about as well) as precursors to sex steroids strongly does what you described, too.
Yes.
https://lowtoxinforum.com/threads/the-skin-as-a-steroidogenic-organ.39577/ -
@Mauritio Thanks. Phew. Surely looks like I've got my serving of reading for the next days with this.
Edit:
After the first pages I noticed I had already read that thread.
Unfortunately there was nothing mentioned on the possibility of a significant reversal or shifting of the powerful topical effects on sex steroid activity between short and long term topical use. IMO the use of transdermal precursors in men past the short term is a really dodgy business.Also, IME with lanolin there's strong variance wrt to the steroid (precursor) composition of the respective product: It seems lanolin product can differ enormously in their compositions with some of them having considerably stronger direct estrogenic activity!
Various light irradiation makes that even messier.
As shown in the strong shifts towards free cholesterol by UV-irradiation. But irradiation also produces additional ranges of other derivatives. UV-irradiation of some plants produces enormous amounts of the secosteroid D3, for example. -
@hwisdom 1. Will you marry me
2. Aromatase is also rich in the testicles
3. Estrogen makes you confident, manic, and pissed off, so you probably just had a reduction of stress hormones, which lowered your blood pressure, causing you to feel stressed -
@risingfire ray said a lot of shit. Most of it was true, but fuck it we ball cream
-
@hwisdom oroboro that shit smear it out and lick between your fingernails
-
@hwisdom dhea sensitizes estrogen receptor and increases expression of EstrogReceptoralpha
-
@CrumblingCookie said in Haidut is poisoning our balls with dogshit solvents?! these solvents instead mog? find out in the next episode of dragonball Z:
Also, IME with lanolin there's strong variance wrt to the steroid (precursor) composition of the respective product: It seems lanolin product can differ enormously in their compositions with some of them having considerably stronger direct estrogenic activity!
Do you have a source for that as well ?
-
@CrumblingCookie said in Haidut is poisoning our balls with dogshit solvents?! these solvents instead mog? find out in the next episode of dragonball Z:
IMO the use of transdermal precursors in men past the short term is a really dodgy business.
Why ? You're simply giving the precursor. Do you have any papers at hand that explain that afurther ?
-
In the medium term the effects and result turn very bad and sour for reasons I cannot explain but only report.
It seems lanolin product can differ enormously in their compositions with some of them having considerably stronger direct estrogenic activity
For that I only have own experience and a collection of notes I loosely took from various papers, i.e. lanolin composition differs widely between different sheep breeds and their origins.
For some basic comparability and reliability it should therefore be important to only use a lanolin product as clean and refined as possible. It's hard to tell in advance. Maybe you'd notice a slight individual preference by smelling differenct products or another kind of intuition. With such high variability and tiny doses to take effects there's really little possibility to resort to lab analysis for such generic cosmetic raw ingredients.
When you think about it, lanolin contains a wide range of sterol esters beside cholesterol (which is only one among many, many). It'd be highly likely and natural for some of them, or other inclusions, to have a degree of hormonal activity of their own.Apart from that I can only refer to an older post by miquelangeles on the prior RPF:
"Also, I don't like lanolin any more. It has a too strong effect on me and I think some of its compounds have a direct hormonal effect themselves, before any conversion takes place.
I find iberian pig lard much better, or any lard from pasture raised pigs. Wild boar lard should be interesting too.
Cholesterol is the main sterol in both lard and tallow and it is highest in lard. (0.37–0.42% in lard, 0.08–0.14% in beef tallow, and 0.23–0.31% in mutton tallow).
In traditional cultures like India, lard has been used by men topically in combination with garlic juice.
It is best if the pig is male and not castrated. That's why wild boar lard should be better but there's no way to know the gender unless you hunt it yourself and render the fat. Testosterone esters accumulate in fat. In the fat of rats for example, testosterone averages 9 ng/g. Fat from female rats or castrated mal rats has no detectable testosterone."
The gender-specific source selection was an interesting idea of him. The closer the topical application to male reproductive organs the more crucial this whole conundrum becomes, I'd say. It's safe to assume that commercial lanolin stems almost exclusively from female animals.
