@Uncover
If you search my username on YouTube, you’ll see I combine truth (critical thinking) with all aspects of leading my family business… and this includes proper nutrition…
In fact, I regularly talk about how I think sugar is a superfood!
Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.
Leader of my family business.
@Uncover
If you search my username on YouTube, you’ll see I combine truth (critical thinking) with all aspects of leading my family business… and this includes proper nutrition…
In fact, I regularly talk about how I think sugar is a superfood!
@LucH said in Open-label trials - how is this allowed?:
@MarkusAllenUSA said in Open-label trials - how is this allowed?:
"blinding" might not be feasible or ethical.
Not all studies can be "double-blind" or do not interest the pharma industries.
For instance about the impact the way of life, the food choices, the quantity of lethal rubbish substance, etc.
=> Always read the conditions of the studies: how long (rarely more than 12 months), with kind of stuff (chaw food or natural), arbitrary limited (only few ingredients, no variety, synthetic or not, etc.)
- read the body of the study, if different of the conclusion to please pharma funds...
Wow. You said "living NPCs". A "truther"/critical thinker here. Love it.
I just learned that many studies are under an "open-label" condition.
Open-label refers to a clinical trial where both the participants and the researchers know the treatment or drug being given to the participants. It's also known as a non-blinded or unmasked trial.
The big problem with open-label is the participants encounter the risk of introducing bias that may distort the results. In simple speak, they claim the drug works better - just because they know they're getting the "treatment" rather than the placebo.
I understand the argument that "blinding" might not be feasible or ethical. But I'd imagine the VAST majority of trials do not fit this condition.
So:
Why in the world are open-label trials allowed? Any thoughts on this?
I wasn't clear...
Do you agree with his conclusions about proper nutrition and excellent health?
@Insomniac
I'm curious about your "he's very entertaining" reply.
Are you suggesting Georgi's nothing beyond entertaining?
Blink twice if yes
@Insomniac
Good catch. I appreciate you fact checking me on this.
He mentioned both periods.
Here's the transcript:
"that saying that for some cancers even twice a month is enough that's all you need to take um probably because it builds up or because it fixes some of these metabolic derangements that are there so I take twice a week I take a regular tablet twice a week uh I take ninite at 500 milligrams daily..."
Georgi Dinkov said the sweet spot was taking aspirin just twice during a month.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXq4S2Dx_b8 (Timestamp: 1:23:20)
@Serotoninskeptic said in Methionine restriction shrinks tumors by ~90%.:
Glycine
So once again, are we to assume that an animal-based (which is high in Glycine) is the go-to way to get our nutrition?
I just got out of the hospital (Johns Hopkins) with Pemphigus.
Over half my body was burned.
Tested positive for Pseudomonas on blood cultures.
In the last 2 years, no one with my "affliction" left the hospital alive... yes - thrilled to be recovering nicely and typing this now.
Now:
I eat EXTREMELY clean. Mostly making stratch-made, animal-based foods and fast-digesting carbs - basically following the Saladino way of eating.
I live in Lancaster County, PA next to the Amish.
It bothers my wife I don't stress about much.
Get at least 90 minutes of deep REM sleep nightly.
Spend a lot of time in the sun.
Hit the gym to build muscle. (It wouldn't surprise me if someone at the same exhaled their COVID poison in my direction.)
Etc.
But I still got attacked with an "autoimmune" disease. No idea how I got it. And no cure. (I don't believe that by the way... I'm just repeating what the Sickness Industrial Complex says about autoimmune diseases.)
Thank you for posting this. Because I think I got ill from absorbing bad juju from other people.