Race and IQ
-
@buckminster Ray Peats views are completely compatible with racial science. Why is racial science psuedo-science again? Because you don't like the conclusions?
-
@gugenmungus for your own sake you should hope so
-
The only conclusion I can make from such grotesque comments is that you don't give a fuck about the work of dr. peat, and are only hear to destroy it and tarnish his name. Possibly paid for by big pharma as a cointelpro style operation, or just a deranged sociopath with nothing better to do than fling shit and destroy beauty.
-
@buckminster I was paid millions of dollars by big pharma to make racist comments on bioenergetic.forum
-
@gugenmungus
"John Ioannidis’ article 'Why most research findings are false' is worth reading. Things discussed on 'forums' aren’t. Ordinary corporate advertising has been supplemented by the much more economical practice of hiring product reviewers to slander competing products, joining multiple forums with their 'unhappy experiences.'" RP (2021) -
claim racial differences are real
"ERM YOU ARE ANTI-PEAT AND PAID BY BIG PHARMA, YOU ARE AN AGENT"
You still haven't told me why it's wrong. It's not incompatible with Ray Peat's work. You have just called me a sociopath to try and evade the claims.
-
I'm not sure how you can't pick up by context that I was obviously talking to the person typing vulgar obscenities at me.
-
I believe IQ changes depending on the race, and i also think the complexity of the your mother tongue will have crucial effects on the development of your IQ.
-
@buckminster point still stands, I would like to know why its incompatible with Ray Peats work.
-
Wait, you literally don't realize racist genetics is incompatible with peat's work? Have you read the work of Dr. Peat? Did you find your way here from memes? I shouldn't have to explain it to you. Read 'Mind and Tissue' and 'Adaptive substance, creative regeneration: Mainstream science, repression, and creativity'
-
@buckminster I've read plenty of his work. I've read his takes on IQ. His work is compatible with the claim that race is a real and valid concept.
Please, explain to me why this is not the case so I can better understand his work.
-
@Sugar There is no doubt that blacks and their brown variants from the desert or aboriginals in the human race are the closest to the putrid vegetal kingdom and the scourge of existential scarcity, they are the furthest from the sucrose metabolism, the ugly dark pigmentation is a adaptation to chronic energy shortage, it serves to obtain ATP from the sun, their aberrant facial proportions such as mouth and nose are a symptom of their low metaphysical stratum, they are condemned to never perceive what is beautiful, holy and of good taste, there are exceptions of course, well-nourished blacks, developed under white logic, Clarence Thomas the best example
-
This post is deleted! -
@buckminster supposing this is true, it would be incredibly ironic if a large part of RP's following nowadays just so happened to be the 'nazis' he dedicated his life to disproving, no? lmao
-
@PUFA-Groyper Peat even knew before he died he had a lot of hype in the right wing community. Hardly see any leftist peaters and the old forum was full of maga christian boomers and or schizos. I don't think peat cared all too much.
-
@FTMarinetti Hold up now. We don't want 1 billion peaty africans to come knocking at Europes borders. Better keep them at 70 IQ, hopefully incapable of using a map and compass
-
@Sugar You 'believe'? Then quote him on it, otherwise don't mention it. Can we have some basic level of respect for the man?
-
Everything is environmental including the genes. Still, there is a limit to how much change can happen in a single generation. Anyone who does not recognize the racial differences in beauty and intelligence is simply stupid.
The validation of IQ is interesting. People says that IQ measures intelligence as people with higher IQ are more likely to get certain outcomes that the bourgeoisie values. Yet, people with extraordinary high IQ gets generally worse outcomes than people with moderately high IQ. If IQ is a valid test of intelligence because higher IQ leads to better outcomes in certain areas, shouldn't the correlation trend be perpetually positive? Are most of the people with 150 IQ dumber than the median person with 135 IQ?
-
This post is deleted! -
read the title as Race and QI and tbh that seems like a much more interesting conversation
