Songs you like
-
-
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
@Norwegian-Mugabe https://www.bps.org.uk/research-digest/men-higher-testosterone-levels-are-less-classical-music-and-opera
Men with lower testosterone levels prefer classical music -
-
@William-Shat that’s a chicken or the egg scenario.
In the Post-WW2 cultural revolution, classical music was coded as no longer “hip,” so those who engaged in the new cultural signaling market only listened to “cool” and “hip” music.
Bach went to a boys school where boys routinely pulled spears out of the armory and got into deadly fights… the most patriarchal authoritarian societies in modern history (Europe as indicated by height and hormonal measurements in the last 50 years) only had church pipe organ music or folk strumming on strings.
Of course the people today who listen to rap or pop music will have overlap between both young and from blood-sport-for-honor ghettos.
When i go to Bach renditions in my town, 80% of the attendants are elderly, including the only old man I've seen in a pencil skirt — this is not a fault of Bach’s “resist firmly all sin,” but rather the cultural coding changing… classical music is objectively better than half of the modern art shared in this thread to be quite frank.
Welcome to my butthurt soapbox, I've had to consider this alot as the two musical genres i love most in my country, folk and classical, are completely dominated by the elite leftists, whilst the diminishing indigenous conservatives, considered it “their” music…
-
@LetTheRedeemed Butthurt soapbox is right.
-
-
-
-
@Rah1woot xD
-
This post is deleted! -
@NoeticJuice said in Songs you like:
It wasn't specifically about classical music, but about "sophisticated" music. From the linked paper:
Thanks for sharing. I do believe it's a chicken or egg scenario, and have no problem with the findings that show classical music enjoyers are on average elderly and childless.
I don't really care much about testosterone
It's incredibly important for men's optimal health and function (maybe we can quibble about DHT, etc); It's the primary hormone produced by men's reproductive glands. I also care a lot about progesterone balance in women, for the same reason.
What is objectively better is subjective; it depends on the purpose for listening. If someone just wanted entertainment, then they could just listen to any music that they find entertaining.
This is the age old modern art argument that we don't have to have here, but guess where I stand
I agree that some modern music has many attractive points to it; I listen to the ones that do a good job.
Different kinds of music have somewhat different effects, and the effects also partially depend on who is listening to the music. A person can choose whatever fits their purpose for them.
There might also be some benefit from listening to a wide variety of genres—the mind gets exposed to a wider range of patterns and sounds.
Agreed. I have one rule in my entertainment by the arts: is it beautiful? That leads one down wild rabbit holes whereby "genre" doesn't cut it, and beauty can be found in the remotest places.
Anyway, the posts by both of you (@William-Shat, @LetTheRedeemed) got me to listen to some classical music again, and I found some new ones that I like and haven't listened to before. So, thank you.
here have another:
Youtube Video -
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
-
-
-
-
