Glucose loading cures everything?
-
@S-Holmes said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
@S-Holmes said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
@Peatful Could you expound on "rough"? I had a very strange burning pain from my neck to the bottom of my ribs yesterday (right side). I put an aspirin under my tongue and took a homeopathic remedy to treat stroke, just in case. It lasted about 15 minutes and then I was fine.
If not for Dr.Peat I wouldn't have given the sucrose protocol a second look. I think he saved my life, but I still have lingering issues, and weight gain which is difficult because I was very thin my entire life. So I'm willing to try anything to feel better. I've been on Nathan Hatch's protocol for a few months, and it was helpful but still didn't quite get me "there." (I still use some of the things he suggests.)
Apologies...I meant glucose protocol, not sucrose.
Hey
All sugars turn into glucose in our body
Lactose, dextrose, sucrose etcYes?
-
@Peatful The gist of the protocol is to skip all of the various conversions and provide glucose directly to the brain.
-
@S-Holmes said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
@Peatful The gist of the protocol is to skip all of the various conversions and provide glucose directly to the brain.
“Protocol”
Please noteThere is nothing new under the sun
Although I haven’t read nor watched this guy
This is just “marketing”The title of the thread is: Glucose loading cures everything?
All sugars turn into glucose
Nothing magical about dextrose as far as I understand PeatOne act of obedience is better than one hundred sermons.
-DB
-
@S-Holmes I love that those little Smarties candies are made with 100% dextrose/glucose. 1 roll contains 6 or 7 grams of dextrose. Someone named them appropriately it seems. I bought some in bulk from Amazon. My little grandbabies are always getting bumps and bruises out here on our farm so Smarties (and Arnica montana) to the rescue!
-
@S-Holmes said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
@S-Holmes I love that those little Smarties candies are made with 100% dextrose/glucose. 1 roll contains 6 or 7 grams of dextrose. Someone named them appropriately it seems. I bought some in bulk from Amazon. My little grandbabies are always getting bumps and bruises out here on our farm so Smarties (and Arnica montana) to the rescue!
This is great
Load up and enjoy
Unless they are loaded with citric acidFor reference
Just in case -
@Peatful You'll need to go back and check out some of the links. There is definitely a difference.
Georgi posted a study, which I believe I shared the link to in this thread, about glucose being used therapeutically in ALS. Why do mostly athletes develop ALS? Traumatic brain injuries are the likely cause. But Dr. Stephens says even milder bumps on the head that aren't obviously concussive will cause irreversible (via normal healing mechanisms) glucose limiting effects on the brain. Pure dextrose seems to be healing these brain injuries.
-
This?
https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/high-sugar-diet-prolongs-survival-in-als-patients.3301/
A high SUGAR diet
And thar happens to be dextrose?It’s about sugar
Not dextrose per say as far as I understandExperiment
Have fun
Enjoy the journey -
"A 2019 study from the University of Arizona found that increasing GLUCOSE DELIVERY to motor neurons affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may help patients live longer and function better. ALS is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that causes increased metabolic activity, known as hypermetabolism. When ALS-affected neurons are given more GLUCOSE, they can convert it into energy to meet their abnormally high energy demands. This may help improve mobility and increase survival rates.
Other research suggests that a higher GLUCOSE-based diet may also help slow ALS progression by preventing protein misfolding. Misfolded proteins can accumulate in the brains of ALS patients, which may contribute to disease progression." -
@S-Holmes mm-hmm
-
I don't think sucrose turns into glucose. Half of sucrose is glucose. Half of it is fructose. Both are metabolized. There are other sugars out there like lactose. It is also metabolized. But there are some that aren't.
Ray has spoken highly n earlier articles of fructose. In the way that it is more easily absorbed and metabolized. So clearly, it does not turn into glucose as you would say it does.
-
@yerrag
"Data from the present study show that ∼90% of dietary fructose is converted into glucose and other metabolites, such as lactate and glycerate, by the small intestine before it reaches the liver. Feb 23, 2018" -
@yerrag said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
I don't think sucrose turns into glucose. Half of sucrose is glucose. Half of it is fructose. Both are metabolized. There are other sugars out there like lactose. It is also metabolized. But there are some that aren't.
Ray has spoken highly n earlier articles of fructose. In the way that it is more easily absorbed and metabolized. So clearly, it does not turn into glucose as you would say it does.
Yes
Im not talking about the processing
Fructose differs in structure etc from lactose obviously
Etc etc etcIm saying
We drink fructose (once processed)
“Oh. Glucose to our brain.”
We drink lactose (once processed)
“Oh. Glucose to our brain”But of course they have different properties
They are two different “foods”Now
This differs from starch vs sugar
Although starchy carbs “turn to glucose”
Very differentOne act of obedience is better than one hundred sermons.
-DB
-
Just thought of something
Im saying mono and disaccharides are the same once turned to glucose….
Same energy per gram….Lactose.
Fructose
Sucrose
EtcI stand corrected if im wrong here
-
@Insomniac said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
@yerrag said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
How is the digestive process bypassed? I fail to see the logic. One way the digestive process is bypassed is by IV feeding. But I don't know if this is what you mean.
This is my main issue with the whole concept. Stephens is claiming isolated dextrose has special properties however it raises glucose in the blood just like food does. So how can the glucose put there from corn sugar do something different from glucose put there from food or even an IV?
I hear you. I would have to say dextrose has the same properties as glucose and that there is no difference I'm how the body metabolizes it, both being simple sugars and in the form of 100% glucose. So another mechanism is at work that disposes the body to more quickly metabolize dextrose.
The only difference I can think of is the rate of glucose entry into the blood could be faster and have a greater concentration peak than could be achieved by food under ordinary conditions especially at higher doses of more than 200 grams people are spiking their glucose through the roof but at least it would be doing something different so you can consider a medicinal effect.If you're familiar with a blood sugar test that was widely available until the 90s (the 5hr oral glucose tolerance test, since replaced by the much less useful hokey pokey HbA1c), a 75gr bolus of glucose is taken after an overnight fast and blood sugar readings are taken every hour. This test was done under supervision because some people (with blood sugar regulation problems) could faint halfway through it because their blood sugar would drop so low.
I ask myself how much more this fainting would happen if a 200g bolus were taken. Yet this risk in not even mentioned by Dr. Stephens. And I wonder why.
It is as if no such event has ever occurred in Dr. Stephen's trials. It's as if all people, with a wide range of blood sugar regulation issues from none to extremely tending to become hypoglycemic (I was one before I fixed myself), are not liable to faint from hypoglycemia.
So, I'm curious as to why. It's as if taking dextrose flips a switch that taking glucose wouldn't - that suddenly everything is hunky dory where very large dextrose intakes (akin to a flood of biblical proportions) would easily be absorbed and metabolized, with nary a problem.
The only answer I could think of is that the body is equipped to handle a sudden deluge of glucose through the polyol pathway, which converts glucose to fructose, and makes possible the large absorption and metabolism of a sugar glucose possible thru its conversion to fructose.
In addition, the body would be triggered to release insulin in large quantities which would inhibit lipolysis, which would clear the way for fatty acid oxidation to be suppressed (given fatty acids in blood would be depleted), paving the way for a high proportion of energy to be produced via mitochondrial oxidation.
At the same time, the pancreas' beta cells would become fully functional with its stem cell exposed to glucose as its stem cells turn into functional beta cells that produce insulin.
Altogether, this transforms the body from a moribund state of low or nonexistent sugar metabolism to a fully alive highly metabolic state over time during therapy. With the caveat that the body has enough stores of nutrients such as vitamin A, D, magnesium to accompany the higher metabolic state's use of more nutrients.
But it is hard to conceive that no such groundwork has been considered and nutrients made available in the therapy, to ensure this transformation happens. And yet people are reporting blood sugar improvements such as that of @evan-hinkle 's blood sugar values.
-
But you're still insisting fructose and lactose turns into glucose before it reaches the brain. I don't know about lactose, but fructose does not have to turn intobglucose to be absorbed and metabolized.
Unless I'm reading wrongly in Peat's early articles on fructose.
-
@yerrag said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
But you're still insisting fructose and lactose turns into glucose before it reaches the brain. I don't know about lactose, but fructose does not have to turn intobglucose to be absorbed and metabolized.
Unless I'm reading wrongly in Peat's early articles on fructose.
From my understanding
Mono (ie: fructose) and di (ie: lactose)
Both are converted into glucose before reaching the brainStarches different story of course
If dextrose is mono
And it does differ from di
Maybe that’s why it’s recommended by this guy? -
This post is deleted! -
@ThinPicking said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
But there's some sort of concert going on.
@ThinPicking said in Are Polls a Good Idea?:
Is it actually possible to substitute in either direction. Maybe just a temporary lack of control and engagement in some. Many ways a person can delude themselves. Misappropriate their condition and capability.I don't know. So this isn't an objection. I'll be creating some posts on the subject at some point.
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/23/9115
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002343/
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.040499
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306987719307145
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163721002865
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00278/fullFor the liver fixation of the Vitamin A toxicity crowd.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981187/
For their aversion to fructose.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.695486/full
-
@evan-hinkle said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
@Insomniac fructose converts to glucose in an oxidative metabolism. This is what I think is the missing piece for everyone here and at the RPF.
No. Fructose does not need conversion to glucose to be metabolized. Actually, fructose is more easily absorbed and metabolized than glucose. You can find many articles in his website (or used to be, if his website is gone) www. raypeat.com about fructose
So, you need oxidative phosphorylation, (thyroid supplementation) or glucose. 2 options, same outcome.
Not 'or' but 'and' glucose ( and oxygen, and more).
-
@ThinPicking said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
@yerrag said in Glucose loading cures everything?:
When tissues cannot absorb and metabolize glucose, why does glucose loading work nonetheless. Perhaps it's because when blood glucose gets high, it triggers the polyol pathway, where glucose is converted to fructose. Unlike glucose, fructose is more easily absorbed and metabolized by tissues.
Evan also mentions hydration of his eyes and better sleep some way up. Along with the teeth thing. My best bet remains that it's resolving a kind of edema. Drawing in structure, raising metabolism, which also produces structured water inherently. I would say filling in edema with structural components, but he also reported some welcome weight loss.
I just wonder at what cost. If this isn't created by or refined from nature. Why not the fructose. Or why would there be a preference for this.
The edema angle is spot on, although the mechanism I can't really explain and remains vague. But a lot has to do with having good metabolism that plays a big role in making the cell acidic internally and alkaline externally in the ECF. This keeps the cell structure stable and distinct and free from being contaminated, so to speak, from the extracellular milieu. The cell won't be bloated with water, for example. A lot of this has to do with the energy in the cell creating structured water to enable a strong barrier that conventional biology calls the cell membrane. In such a state, you can create an osmotic balance that keeps the eye fluids from getting to feel dry. Sleep is better the brain isn't under stress as energy flows well with the mitochondria producing the energy adequately to power restful sleep. As for the teeth, it may go as far as the cell being in optimal metabolic state, augurs well for the continued osteooblast activity in building structure in bones, with the abundance of CO2, and sufficient dietary calcium to strengthen teeth - as teeth isn't being leached due to osteoclast activity being turned off.
All this has to be associated with enabling oxidative phosphorylation, as glucose is being used heavily optimally.
Temporal thinking is the faculty that’s
engaged by an enriched environment, but it’s
wrong to call it “thinking,” because it’s simply
the way organisms exist... - Ray Peat Nov 2017 Newsletter
