On The Back of a Tiger
-
Reposting here for discussion:
Following on from Haidut's comment:
'I think every person the authors of the Tiger movie interviewed died shortly afterwards. Peat was the only one left and did mention, though kinda jokingly, in a podcast that it is indeed suspicious.'In 2021, the same film maker released a short documentary on the artist David Dees, called Do You See What I See: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7hgzkLGFLe8
3 months after filming, David Dees died of cancer.Like Ray, David Dees was also a critic of Zionism and the political establishment.
Ray has stated in the past that his property had been broken into and ransacked. Dees' friends claim that he was also targeted with break-ins at his property (Max Igan mentions in this video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/tuPIOlH6uUKX )
Do You See What I See?
From illustrating for Sesame Street to exposing the New World Order, this is the story of the controversial David Dees, unofficial artist of conspiracy theory culture. What sent him down the rabbit hole, and is there a path out?
Shortly after 9/11, a Sesame Street illustrator named David Dees is fired from his job of 13 years after telling to his boss that the world is being undermined by a nefarious cabal of shadowy elite. Jobless, but armed with his illustration prowess, David decides to use art to expose these clandestine plans and maleficent actors, going down a dark hole where only news from like-minded conspiracy websites trickles through. In the process he unwittingly becomes the official artist of conspiracy culture. At its best, his art is weirdly amusing, but at their worst, they are ugly, offensive, and often anti-Semitic in nature (the filmmaker is Jewish, and confronts him on this). The deluded ugliness of his art is dissonant with his offline life. He raises bunnies in his yard, sings to elderly people in hospice, and meditates daily on universal love. How how someone with a happy home life, talent, and commercial success fall so deep down the rabbit hole? Is there a path back out?Another interesting fact is that one of the film makers had previously received funding from Borscht Corp
- Borscht Corp was directly funded by John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
- Knight Foundation President & CEO, Alberto Ibargen served on the Council for Foreign Relations
Knight Foundation funds Center to Fight Online Disinformation at Carnegie Mellon University (the Center for Informed Democracy and social Cyber security iDeaS will study how disinformation is spread through online channels, such as social media, and address how to counter its effects to preserve and build an informed citizenry.) - Knight Foundation also funds Trust, Media and Democracy initiative (other contributors: the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Open Society Foundations)
-
Are you making an assertion?
If you want a discussion you need to actually begin.
-
Ehhh I'm not convinced. There's been far more famous vocal critics of Zionism who are still alive today. If there is something going on this isn't the angle I'd explore.
And with someone like Ray...hell there's several reasons why he might be 86ed (not saying he was, just exploring this hypothetical highway you're going down). Billion dollar pharma industry wants to keep people unhealthy and ignorant so they can never be medically autonomous.
Self autonomy is what people in power fear the most. It's why a guy like Nikola Tesla, who was working on abundant and unlimited electricity for everyone, had much of his work stolen and disappeared after his death. It's obviously not coincidental that JP Morgan pulled his funding too. They might be connected actually, although I think there was an intelligence agency angle to his work disappearing.
-
@Mulloch94 said in On The Back of a Tiger:
Ehhh I'm not convinced. There's been far more famous vocal critics of Zionism who are still alive today. If there is something going on this isn't the angle I'd explore.
And with someone like Ray...hell there's several reasons why he might be 86ed (not saying he was, just exploring this hypothetical highway you're going down). Billion dollar pharma industry wants to keep people unhealthy and ignorant so they can never be medically autonomous.
Self autonomy is what people in power fear the most. It's why a guy like Nikola Tesla, who was working on abundant and unlimited electricity for everyone, had much of his work stolen and disappeared after his death. It's obviously not coincidental that JP Morgan pulled his funding too. They might be connected actually, although I think there was an intelligence agency angle to his work disappearing.
Have read that the personal backgrounds on Tesla, L. Ron Hubbard and George Orwell are much different than the stuff that usually gets regurgitated about them. George Orwell in particular was supposedly really bad.
But anyway, i don't have info on the others handy but here's a good weekend read on Tesla:
Part 1: Newton, Rosicrucianism and the Imperial Control of Science
Part 2: Tesla’s Eugenics (and other Black Magick)
Part 3: Tesla and his Nazi Friend… The Strangest Friendship
Part 4: Tesla’s Martians and H.G. Wells
Part 5: Tesla: From Extreme Empiricist to Father of A.I. Gods
Part 6: Why Tesla Flattened Space and Attacked Einstein
Part 7: Tesla Evolves a New Species!
Part 8: Bulwer’s Dream and the Coming Race
Part 9: Thomas Huxley’s War on the Soul and the Rise of Social Imperialism
Part 10: Tesla's Mentor Sir William Crookes: Scientist at the Service of the Occult
Part 11: Harry Houdini vs the Society for Psychical Research
Part 11 has links to the rest of the series.
-
@Rah1woot said in Does anyone else hate AI?:
It is not surprising that a British person enjoying the fruits of world empire would write a weepy treatise about "the importance of true individualist adventure". Code: the importance of backbreaking labor for people halfway around the world that I ideally never see, to fund my trips to the cafe for African coffee.
This is what Orwell was as well. He writes his truest fear as that of being objectively understood, which is very telling.
Dodgy ticker. Dodgy thymus.
-
@ThinPicking Are you a real person? A lot of your posts seem like garbled nonsense.
-
The circumstances of the documentary already seemed strange.
Both film maker's fathers were in medical academia. One of them had past connections to organisations such Gates Foundation and Knight foundation. His work covers fringe and conspiracy related content, presented in a style intended to undermine the subjects.
They raised funds through a Kick starter campaign on the forum but after arranging and conducting all of the interviews, they abandoned the project as if they had never intended to complete the documentary.
Most (if not all) the subjects died within the proceeding months/years of being filmed.
The filmmakers were unable to produce a documentary to honor the deceased interviewees due to 'other work commitments'. Despite having taken tens of thousands of dollars in donations and having 5 years to produce something.
This all seemed very strange. Even Ray himself commented that it was suspicious before he died.
Then, if you add the fact that the subject of their next documentary was also a critic of the medical establishment, whose work was becoming increasingly influential online. And that he also died 3 months after filming.
It naturally raises some suspicion in my mind. Did they arrange to film these people in their homes and places of work for other purposes? I think it deserves some more attention.
-
Your original post is literally garbled nonsense. Even in your most recent reply above you're not actually saying anything.
Now you're pissy about someone pointing this out. What is your point.
-
@energy-structure said in On The Back of a Tiger:
It naturally raises some suspicion in my mind. Did they arrange to film these people in their homes and places of work for other purposes? I think it deserves some more attention.
@bot-mod said in marina abramovic says trump is the best thing that happend to us:
-
Ray was the type of man who would have stayed the course regardless of the cabal or MIC
A true bad ass;
or prophet (and biblically it usually was a difficult road for them)I am led to believe that he enjoyed energy metabolism; but his mission was freeing us from the chains we don’t know are there
That’s why being sick and even to a greater extent- that suffering - is a gift to be used wisely
It opens us up more….Ray himself said he took the opportunity to discuss “health and physiology” as a gateway for meatier things…
-
@BioEclectic said in On The Back of a Tiger:
@Mulloch94 said in On The Back of a Tiger:
Ehhh I'm not convinced. There's been far more famous vocal critics of Zionism who are still alive today. If there is something going on this isn't the angle I'd explore.
And with someone like Ray...hell there's several reasons why he might be 86ed (not saying he was, just exploring this hypothetical highway you're going down). Billion dollar pharma industry wants to keep people unhealthy and ignorant so they can never be medically autonomous.
Self autonomy is what people in power fear the most. It's why a guy like Nikola Tesla, who was working on abundant and unlimited electricity for everyone, had much of his work stolen and disappeared after his death. It's obviously not coincidental that JP Morgan pulled his funding too. They might be connected actually, although I think there was an intelligence agency angle to his work disappearing.
Have read that the personal backgrounds on Tesla, L. Ron Hubbard and George Orwell are much different than the stuff that usually gets regurgitated about them. George Orwell in particular was supposedly really bad.
But anyway, i don't have info on the others handy but here's a good weekend read on Tesla:
Part 1: Newton, Rosicrucianism and the Imperial Control of Science
Part 2: Tesla’s Eugenics (and other Black Magick)
Part 3: Tesla and his Nazi Friend… The Strangest Friendship
Part 4: Tesla’s Martians and H.G. Wells
Part 5: Tesla: From Extreme Empiricist to Father of A.I. Gods
Part 6: Why Tesla Flattened Space and Attacked Einstein
Part 7: Tesla Evolves a New Species!
Part 8: Bulwer’s Dream and the Coming Race
Part 9: Thomas Huxley’s War on the Soul and the Rise of Social Imperialism
Part 10: Tesla's Mentor Sir William Crookes: Scientist at the Service of the Occult
Part 11: Harry Houdini vs the Society for Psychical Research
Part 11 has links to the rest of the series.
Thanks I'll give it read. As for Orwell I don't really know if he was "bad" but he was a socialist, so it seems to illustrate he was kinda dumb. The only good socialist is a dead socialist.
-
@Mulloch94 2000 Palantir Plus points have been deposited into your account.
As Westerners, we are accustomed to a certain dryness or abstractness in scientific and academic matters. "Just reporting the plain facts" is taken as a kind of ideal, in the U.S. particularly. If we think about Soviet intellectual life at all, it is often to deplore the "politicizing" of matters that should be mere questions of fact. It is seldom that we can imagine a fact which is intrinsically "ideological." A few western scientists have decried this "hard fact" syndrome in American and European science, but their criticisms are not really heard. In fact, these scientists usually criticize themselves right out of the world of practicing scientists, and into a kind of underworld that is populated mainly by older, individualistic intellectuals--Michael Polanyi and Albert Szent-Gyorgyi are the best known members of this scientific counter-culture which calls for intellectual wholeness, responsibility, and integrity.
For historical and cultural (and political) reasons, however, the Soviet scientist is likely to see everything he does as having social significance and ideological overtones, apart from any urging he might get from the bureaucrats to praise the insights of Lenin and Stalin into his particular field.
Sometimes these paragraphs of praise that are included in occasional scientific papers seem simply bizarre to a westerner, who is used to politicians being politicians, and scientists being scientists. But the fact is that both Lenin and Stalin were remarkable intellectuals who believed it was their political responsibility to be very well informed about cultural and scientific matters. It is this same attitude which makes the Soviet scientist likely to choose problems with social significance, and to interpret his work in terms of a large historical framework. While an American scientist undoubtedly does work within a definite intellectual framework, the framework is mostly tacit, and serves to justify the collection of "mere facts."
The whole analytical and skeptical tradition of British philosophy has not been taken very seriously by the Slavic and Latin* cultures, and Marxism has enabled the Russians further to disregard many of the formulations and proscriptions of Anglo-American thought. The idea of the image is the most important example of this dichotomy in the intellectual world, and is the crucial issue in brain research and all of its ramifications--including language, health, education, adaptation to new conditions, and the planning of work."Hitlerite Peaters" should read Mind and Tissue.
-
@energy-structure good thread. That is fucked up. But aren’t their more critical people of say Zionism. Or the medical establishment? Also what dumbasses for killing everyone they interviewed. You know Nick stumphauzer? He had a video with Danny Roddy and he was talking about after he posted “died suddenly” people where trying to fly him out and offer him money etc etc. or being followed by unmarked vehicles. Honestly would not be mad if peat went mainstream. Or sugar not being bad.
This also reminds me there is so much more knowledge I should extract from peat because I honestly have just heard the surface level.
The more knowers the better -
“died suddenly”
Worlds most legit documentary 100.
people where trying to fly him out and offer him money
Sounds totally comparable.
-
@ThinPicking Me when the guy sitting next to me on the plane says he found a way to make cars run with just water:
Me when: Pfizer offers to fly me out after finding cure to cancer
Me when Thinpicking is the average gadfly /troll
-
@Rah1woot I wouldn't call myself a "Hitlerite" because I don't really like Hitler or any fascist regime for that matter. But sure, if you put my feet to the fire and make me choose I'll take a fascist over a commie any day. Not really comparable in terms of their detrimental force inflicted on society. The latter is significantly worse.
Edit: The one asterisk I would probably put here is that, in America specifically, the left-wing is a bit of a joke. Like they're not taken seriously, and shouldn't be as long as they keep up the woke shit. Whereas the fringes on the right here are actually pretty coherent. Though even they lack the formidable beachhead at the present time to be considered a legitimate threat. Someone more right-winged than Trump would have to take office for that to change.
-
I'll take a fascist over a commie any day.
As predicted.
in America specifically, the left-wing is a bit of a joke. Like they're not taken seriously, and shouldn't be as long as they keep up the woke shit. Whereas the fringes on the right here are actually pretty coherent.
The huge amount of money the CIA had from the Marshall Plan allowed them, starting around 1950, to shape the culture and political movements in the US, providing carrots to complement the FBI’s sticks. Their biggest achievement has probably been to obliterate coherent thinking about the meaning of “left” and “right” in politics. People with policies very much like Mussolini’s call themselves liberals, and promote war. The culture has been shaped to exclude the idea of class from political thinking. Several years ago, when John Edwards’ spoke of social class issues during his campaign for the presidency, the media immediately stopped treating him as a viable candidate. Trump’s focus on class issues helped to enfuriate his opposition, but didn’t stop people from voting. If class becomes a continuing part of political discussion, it might lead toward a restoration of democracy.
“Identity politics” has been a powerful way to distract people from their economic interests. As soon as M.L. King made the issue class, rather than race, he was killed. Many prominent “leftists” have been agents of the FBI or CIA, in the promotion of that cultural confusion.
Raymond Peat.
-
I'm sorry gg. I'll study your threads in detail to improve my contributions going forwards.
While I've got you. Can you tell me as a recipient, how did stump's docu go down? Or did ye avoid. Asking for science.
-
@ThinPicking its good bro I appreciate you
-
@Rah1woot You're really beckoning for the thread to be taken drastically off course here lol. What is this even doing, other than validating what I already said? Peat isn't wrong when he said this, or anyone else with half a brain that knows this. If you're even remotely familiar with the left's historical roots and still prescribe to that way of thinking then you would know identity politics is dumb.
But Peat, like most leftists I've read (with the exception of a slim few), have a really bad sociological analysis on power dynamics. The Marxian class theory is junk. Historical materialism, private ownership, and the rise of industrial capital isn't where modern so called, lets say, "Power Elites" originated from.
Rather it's a gradual long-term structural process shaped by geography, various institutions, and culture. The same social networks that enabled Capitalism to rise are the same ones that allow Communism to function. And when those networks fail, you get a breakdown in the system (which we have seen).
