Trump just convinced Coca-Cola to use real sugar in domestic Coke!
-
@sunsunsun Haidut has said that there is still starch content in HFCS if it hasn't been filtered properly and Ray has said it may be contaminated with heavy metals. https://bioenergetic.life/clips/75d75?t=1184&c=24
Judging by this, I think the only real issue with HFCS seems to be that it MIGHT be contaminated and I guess you don't really know for sure unless you have your own lab to test it.
-
We will see. There's a lot of promises that never come to fruition.
But it would be great. This Mexicola is pricy where I live. -
@Milk-Destroyer haidut is referencing peat's assertion which I think has been proven to be based on a retracted study.
I looked up the mercury claims and it seems like the amounts in it are of no concern. That sounds like a reddit take but apparently normal drinking water has more than soda. This is from reddit:
"You give me a good enough meter and I'll find mercury in every single food (natural or otherwise) on the face of the planet. When fish has mercury levels in the PPM, I don't think you really need to worry about your soda having mercury in the PPT range. The difference between the mercury content in a can of tuna and the mercury content in a can of coke is 4 orders of magnitude. You would have to drink over 1000 cans of coke to get the same amount of mercury you'd get from a can of tuna."
-
@LucH everything you said applies to sucrose
-
Aren't they unbonded in HFCS, and maybe something enantiomer related with fructose compounds a distinct effect. I don't have a claim though, I'll drink an HFCS coke. Maybe hold the aspartame.
-
@LucH said in Trump just convinced Coca-Cola to use real sugar in domestic Coke!:
Note: Fructose is taken up and metabolized almost entirely by the liver, when HD fructose comes in once, whereas the majority of an oral glucose load escapes the liver to be metabolized in peripheral tissues when required (physical expenditures).
2 birds, 1 abstract and inconvenient stone.
https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/2319/glucose-loading-cures-everything
https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/6764/what-s-the-consensus-on-vitamin-a-in-our-community -
Yeah apparently, for those who hadn’t heard, Ray said both types of Coke work metabolically. It’s just that taste-wise he preferred the Mexican one:
Post in thread 'Ray Peat Email Advice Depository'
https://lowtoxinforum.com/threads/ray-peat-email-advice-depository.1035/post-9714Q:Someone told me you drink HFCS coke regularly? do you think it is not
that harmful if someone is healthy?
A:I prefer Mexican coke with real sugar (it tastes very different), but metabolically there isn't much difference. -
I believe if it tastes better it is better. Taste is the bodies judge of nutritional quality.
-
Apparently this is, as they say, "fake news," but I hope that it becomes real news
-
This post is deleted!
