New "Mission" of RPF
-
Here's Charlie's thoughts on his banning of everyone:
Post in thread 'The Next BIG KEY To The Low Toxin Movement? CALCIUM' https://lowtoxinforum.com/threads/the-next-big-key-to-the-low-toxin-movement-calcium.53881/post-1012810
-
@VehmicJuryman said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Here's Charlie's thoughts on his banning of everyone:
Post in thread 'The Next BIG KEY To The Low Toxin Movement? CALCIUM' https://lowtoxinforum.com/threads/the-next-big-key-to-the-low-toxin-movement-calcium.53881/post-1012810
Horrible apology, no admission of wrongdoing, he doesn't apologize for doing what he did including banning dozens of people, he apologizes if some people were upset.
His phrases “did the best I could”, 0 accountability, pure Cope, in the message he implicitly justifies the dozens of illegitimate bans with the fact that according to him he had to promote “low A” ideas, when in reality he could have promoted these “low A” ideas without illegitimate banning.
"“I'm not perfect” water is wet, he was a horrible admin at the times of the dozens of bans and still is considering his recent actions.
I created an account recently and he sent me a message and said that I was welcome on the forum if i want to further “low toxin” ideas, yet a week later he didn't allow any of my comments as they were different from his ideas in terms of calcium, dairy, and his behavior, so he has absolutely not changed on that aspect, he still wants an echo Chamber where he pushes his normies ideas, glaze his own ideas, and wants yes men.
The “apology” message is mainly a facade, since recently people from the garett group have started experimenting outside the garett group, and so charlie wanted these people to come so he can get more money out of them.
-
'hindsight is >>>20/20<<<'
'Angry people, hurt people.'
Can block the sun.
-
This post is deleted! -
-
@water-fire said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Any idea what this part mean?
It's just a common phrase that's particularly relevant for all we've just been through.
-
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
'Angry people, hurt people.'
It's somewhat viral @water-fire.
Take the apology.
-
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
'Angry people, hurt people.'
It's somewhat viral @water-fire.
Take the apology.
Bad fake apology, read my whole post with the account création part
-
@water-fire said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Bad fake apology, read my whole post with the account création part
I did but did again. And will do again a few more. The sound of music can change in behaviour affected circadian and infradian patterns. As he said, 'I am not perfect'.
@water-fire said in New "Mission" of RPF:
I created an account recently and he sent me a message and said that I was welcome on the forum if i want to further “low toxin” ideas, yet a week later he didn't allow any of my comments as they were different from his ideas in terms of calcium, dairy, and his behavior, so he has absolutely not changed on that aspect, he still wants an echo Chamber where he pushes his normies ideas, glaze his own ideas, and wants yes men.
He doesn't know what's wrong. And trying to tell him is a cryptography puzzle.
'normies'. I'm not fond of the term. But there are enough of them to squash you @water-fire.
-
If contrite:
Why not reopen the forum to all-
Create a thread stating I APOLOGIZE - I WELCOME ALL BACKWhy can’t I search to reference my past content
Or
Reach out to those I was communicating with privately regarding health matters
And
Why have cloudflare security or whatever just to view the home page now?Actions speak louder than words.
The further society drifts from the truth the more it will hate those who speak it.
SD
-
@Peatful said in New "Mission" of RPF:
Actions speak louder than words.
Someone could assist him to coolify his crappy shop (and wrap the service while they're at it). So money is less of an object. They need only to 'spend' 'some' of their currency in doing so.
-
@Peatful said in New "Mission" of RPF:
If contrite:
Why not reopen the forum to all-
Create a thread stating I APOLOGIZE - I WELCOME ALL BACKBecause otherwise it wouldn't be an echo chamber anymore, the few people on the low toxin forum would realize that Charlie has very few coherent ideas, and that the forum serves as a platform for him to take money from people.
Why can’t I search to reference my past content
Greed.
Actions speak louder than words.
It does
-
The irony is his first most offensive ban that got everyone mad was when he banned the guy for not calling Mr Mercola “Dr Mercola.” LOL
-
@LetTheRedeemed said in New "Mission" of RPF:
that got everyone mad
Maybe a synthesis with the Genereux/Smith thread would have worked out.
-
'I'm sorry I had to ban you all for your own good'
There's no helping that guy.
-
@risingfire exactly. He keeps using Peats name while slandering him.
-
@Hando-Jin dark triad
-
@ThinPicking are you suggesting that someone pays Charlie? XD
-
@Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:
'I'm sorry I had to ban you all for your own good'
Mental reasoning
What shows the mental reasoning for this kind of excuse: “I'm sorry I had to ban you for your own good”
This excuse is often employed by moderators or administrators to justify actions taken against a user, suggesting that the ban was a necessary measure to protect the user or the community from negative consequences, even against oneself!Rationale
The user is supposed to have been banned for violating rules or guidelines, such as posting inappropriate content, engaging in harassment, or spamming. The "for your own good" part is meant to soften the blow of the ban, implying it was a difficult decision made with the user's best interests in mind.Effectiveness
While the excuse may seem reasonable in some cases, it can also be perceived as condescending or manipulative. It can be seen as an attempt to avoid accountability or to justify actions that may not be entirely justified by the user's behavior.Banned to avoid accountability
Banning a user as a way to avoid accountability is a tactic employed by individuals or organizations to evade responsibility for their actions or decisions. This can manifest in various ways, attempting to silence criticism or suppress information related to their actions. Especially when there is no possibility offered to answer and explain the targeted behavior. The moderation intended so to avoid minor issues, such as attacking the credibility of the arguments, or claiming to be unfairly targeted. After all, no negative waves are allowed
The atmosphere has to be kept “clean” for most of the readers. One wants to avoid contamination. No stress, mate … -
@Living_thing said in New "Mission" of RPF:
are you suggesting that someone pays Charlie? XD
No it's a suggestion someone give him a fishing net, not a fish.
'Payment' in 'currency' is a meme about what's actually valuable. Because there's almost no price discovery and money itself is almost but not totally meaningless.
