I want to bully danny roddy
-
@sunsunsun yooo sunsunsun unblocked me for the third time
@LetTheRedeemed state your argument in a precise manner
@jamezb46 said in I want to bully danny roddy:
The truth is that nature tends toward virtue, excellence, clarity, happiness, and honesty under normal circumstances. It is in truth this modern 'experiment' that is the blip on the radar compared to tens of thousands of years of virtue.
this is a projection of human moral ideals onto an indifferent world, Nature does not aim at virtue; it aims at power, it's will to power overflow, struggle, domination, growth, decay. Concepts like virtue, honesty, or happiness are interpretations created by particular cultures to stabilize life, not natural endpoints.
-
@lykos James explained it fine
-
@lykos said in I want to bully danny roddy:
before that mentally ill faggot charlie destroyed it
Different context but it also wasn't working out for him.
@lykos said in Has anyone improved their health by peating:
You will find out in a few years
Try to find the moral of the story.
-
@lykos Ah yes, and what is your evidence for this nihilistic Nietzschian conclusion? Perhaps it is that the people that you encounter in the modern world, or the pseudo-philosophical views spewed by internet-famous 'villains' imply it?
But is that view of the state of nature on this planet actually the precipitate of thinking? of sound reasoning? Or is it the predictable consequence of your projecting onto the past the sad realities that modern alienation creates?
Keep in mind that it is actually quite useful from the perspective of those currently in power to convince you and everyone else of this neo-darwinian world, where animals in a state of nature are thought to be always and everywhere at each other's throats, seeking to do nothing except destroy, live at the expense of others, copulate, and then die while in their last breath cursing the supposedly hellish world they inhabit. It is useful because it convinces you that to truly "live" you must be a ruthless, cold "individual" unwilling to make meaningful social relationships with people and instead focusing everything on making "profit" as it is defined in the culture.
But none of that has any actual evidence behind it as being the true state of nature. Hunter gatherers and early societies simply did not work like that. If I had to summarize it, what life on earth is actually about is exploring the world that so graciously has been given to us, and occasionally fighting for survival when the environment demands it.
In time there is life but no knowledge; outside time there is knowledge but no life
-
@lykos says the chronically sick person. If everyone is a low IQ retard why cant a brilliant person such as yourself heal your issues? Why do you constantly post on here? Sounds like you just want attention
-
@risingfire i am looking for high iq truth seekers and physiology enthusiasts, people such as those who used the old forum, sadly most of them did not migrate here. Are there any more chuds here or am i the only one??
We should make our own group “chudenergetics” -
@jamezb46 You are correct that modern society lies about nature but you are wrong to think the truth beneath it is benevolent. Your poistion is not anti-nihilistic but nostalgic. Nietzsche did not believe nature was merely brutal competition, he criticized Darwin for being too focused on survival, rather than expansion, intensity, and expression of power. Even if huntergatherers were more communal, they were still driven by blind striving, hunger, power, reproduction, and death.
-
@lykos Yes, they needed to not die, but the idea that they were constantly hungry, warring, aggressive, and territorial is a complete myth.
The fact is that life was fairly easy for most of our existence. Once you figure out how to hunt in packs, throw spears, make bows and arrows, and club an animal to death using stones, you are already more deadly than any predator.
So, we spent most of our time living in abundance, at peace, and being secure that we would have enough food mostly because we knew where to find it.
I'm not sure what the point of your comments about "all females are prostitutes" is. I agree that women today are way more promiscuous than even 2 generations ago. But the norm of nature is for women not to be promiscuous. So you're going to let a single generation of shit modern society convince you that this world is an irredeemable hell?
It clearly isn't. Its mostly a good place that modern societies have disturbed the balance of.
In time there is life but no knowledge; outside time there is knowledge but no life
-
I seriously doubt someone who says every single woman is a prostitute, has much value to bring to a debate. It’s like arguing with someone, who refuses to go outside, that the grass is green (“it’s not green from my flat!”). I can even defend provocative statements, but the anon makes no escapes of nuance for himself.
-
@jamezb46 said in I want to bully danny roddy:
mostly because we knew where to find it.I'm not sure what the point of your comments about "all females are prostitutes" is. I agree that women today are way more promiscuous than even 2 generations ago. But the norm of nature is for women not to be promiscuous. So you're going to let a single generation of shit modern society convince you that this world is an irredeemable hell?
Idk where u got the idea that nature of women is not to be whores??? Because in the past we lived in patriarchies where women were the mans property that doesnt mean those devious creatures were saints, they were under the yoke. Life was always struggle for survival nothing comes easy in this world especially back then. Your messages read like tradcuck delusion the redpill is a a bluepill lad
-
Where are you in your picture.
@lykos said in I want to bully danny roddy:
i am looking for high iq
Try harder.
-
Why do you think that throughout history domineering patriarchs kept those "devious little creatures" in their place. What is your actual evidence beyond your simply projecting modern trends into the past?
What is in the far past is in the far past and so in inaccessible to some extent. But, in general, the better an animal's conditions are, the more selective it is about its food, its mates, where it lives, etc. Settling for rotting fruit, weeks old rotting carcasses, and sleeping on the forest floor, and madly and recklessly seeking out mates to sleep with are all reckless life choices that only an organism that is desperate will make.
Humans have biology that directly moved away from the model you are suggesting. Women have secret ovulation, meaning that no one knows when she is ovulating. That evolved due to evolutionary pressure for men and women to stay bonded for long-term relationships, because there is no way for mating to occur successfully otherwise because ovulation is secret.
There are primates that fail to show this feature like chimpanzees. Chimpanzee ovulation is public, meaning that male chimp can see when females chimps are ovulating, which does actually encourage "whore-like" behavior, and that is exactly what female chimps do when they are in estrus - they mate with many chimps.
But humans diverged from this pattern many thousands of years ago.
I strong suggest you re-evaluate your views on what life tends towards, because your views are not only anti-Peat they are also clearly your projecting onto the past without any evidence.
-
@lykos this is a health forum based on bioenergetics. Go to a looksmaxxing forum. Goes to show your IQ is low
