@C-Mex I can't seem to read what he said because it's behind a paywall, though if everything is based on Ray Peat's research, I'd rather read Ray Peat. I don't think the audience he's going to reach is significant enough for anyone to pander to him, and a large community giving attention to him benefits him a lot more than anyone else.
As a character he's not very good either. Threatening to sue Danny/Katherine is in poor taste, as well as I remember someone called him Mr. Mercola, rather than Dr, and he was mortally offended, hysterically saying the guy who wrote that ought to be banned. Such an ego and self-centered view of the world is only concerned with his own appearance, just fundamentally incapable of any 3rd person view or out-of-the-box kind of thinking. He's not well educated, just indoctrinated; the framework of what he memorized in school guiding his thought process, occasionally making connections with made up information, but to his core incapable of breaking out of the terms defined for him already. There is no intelligent contribution he can find that will help complete the greater understanding in hollism
The only good he could ever do is maybe sponsor Georgi's research ideas with whatever connections he has.
In terms of getting the word out, random people making Ray Peat tiktoks would be more efficient at spreading the word rather than having to follow someone who's consistently gotten the basics wrong and try to constantly steer them in the right direction. At some point you have to realize hand holding someone that cannot come to correct conclusions on his own isn't time well spent, and you ought to filter him out like the rest of the noise on the internet.