Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.
@Peatly said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
For more riveting jokes like those see here, here, here, here
I'm sorry for not being outraged 24/7 about jewish eugenic schemes. I should not have joked about it. I will peat harder so that, just like you, I can be offended all the time and not joke about this serious matter.
@lanadelesoteric said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
VULGAR ANTISEMITE
I agree, sophisticated ANTISEMITISM is much funnier.
@ThinPicking Why bother responding to me if you have nothing to say other than "No, you're wrong." It seems like I'm not the one with too much time on his hands.
@ThinPicking said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
You sound mad.
You're reading too much into my comments.
@ThinPicking said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
Such a holistic scientist will be quite good at finding some lights in the dark. Of a world and of a person.
Malthus had some good points too.
@ThinPicking said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
Or this one?
That one would be good enough. I agree that genes do not define our lives completely, but they have large influence on us - to deny that is ridiculous. What would be the point of genes then? Why would we pass them to our offspring? IQ has a genetic component, but it's not defined by it. It's hardly controversial.
Race is genetic by common sense. And common sense also indicates that blacks will be black, and whites white, whether they live in Sahara or Siberia. And if peoples' skins are different and bones and x-rays, then why not brains too? If you can measure intelligence, then it's expected that there'll be differences between races. You have no arguments against it, you just assume the opposite. The articles do not prove your point. They just indicate that not all is up to genes with which I agree. They do not say that genes play no role or that some characteristics defined by them can be completely overpowered by environment or metabolic state.
@ThinPicking said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
Many can struggle with not knowing, yet. With travelling. You need a foothold or two to concentrate power. They tend to fail in time. War can be born.
Why do you always write like half-assed impersonation of Yoda?
@Peatly said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
you fall back on saying you were joking?
Have you even read my comment? How can you not tell that saying: "moulding into an ostrich with New Yorkers being an intermediate state" and then "reappropriating" out-of-context quote is not done in a joking way?
@Peatly said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
You knew exactly what you were doing with that quote.
Yes, a bait. Funny for some, clearly not for you. Kinda makes it funnier. You're taking this "eugenics" and "all of use are being poisoned" stuff too personally for an online forum in topic that's was meant to be humorous from the start. Have some sense of humour.
@Peatly I guess quoting and promoting Marx, Lenin, Stalin, or Wilhelm Reich by Ray Peat and users in other threads is alright, but using out-of-context quote from Malthus for fun is too far. (Btw Paul Ehrlich had arguably more influence on modern elites than Malthus whom he never cites AFAIK tho he's work is a massively dumbbed down version of Malthus.)
So, please stop virtue signalling and respond to the argument, or at least don't play the victim card.
@lanadelesoteric said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
the fickleness and pettiness of the original poster to react like such a women at the age of 20 because SHOCK HORROR someone made a joke at his expense
It clearly was meant to be humorous post so don't read too much into it.
Average age here is way too high...
@Peatly said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
the first generation offspring of these immigrants had heads shaped more like New Yorkers or Puerto Ricans than like the European parents.
It's a very interesting observation, but it proves nothing. What would be required is a series of measurements over multiple generations and then to show that those changes can overpower genetic differences. For as far as we know they might have been moulding into an ostrich with New Yorkers being an intermediate state. Meanwhile, reappropriating Malthus' quote:
A writer may tell me that he thinks man will ultimately become an ostrich. I cannot properly contradict him. But before he can expect to bring any reasonable person over to his opinion, he ought to shew, that the necks of mankind have been gradually elongating; that the lips have grown harder, and more prominent; that the legs and feet are daily altering their shape; and that the hair is beginning to change into stubs of feathers. And till the probability of so wonderful a conversion can be shewn, it is surely lost time and lost eloquence to expatiate on the happiness of man in such a state
Also, I don't know how changes were measured, but fat distribution or weakened bone structure due to different diet could potentially explain some of it. And the fact that black people in USA are still black, and whites are white, and mexicans distinctly mexican proves that extrapolating the changes ad infinitum till we're all one grey race was wrong.
@ThinPicking said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
Visually, obviously.
Racial differences are bones deep (or even deeper) as shown by MIT study where Deep Learning model could predict race from X-ray images.
In the end, you're just begging the question: Ray Peat said everything is environmental or metabolic; ergo, race (or cognition) is environmental or metabolic.
@ThinPicking said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
I've taken issue with the idea genetic differences can explain variance in cognitive potential. Assuming that's even measurable.
It seems petty to me to acknowledge physical genetic differences but deny that there's a possibility of cognitive genetic differences. And, moreover, at the same time question whether the cognitive potential is even measurable. If a "difference" is not measurable how can we even talk of science?
@ThinPicking said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
I could take issue with the idea that genes are deterministic of physical differences over several generations, or that they're able to retain them if there are drastic changes in environment.
I don't understand what you mean by this. Blacks in america are still black even tho environment changed and generations passed. But if you inter-breed and change genes then appearance will change too obviously.
@ThinPicking You seem to be denying genetic differences but if groups of people are visually different then they're likely genetically also.
@lanadelesoteric said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
the 'oh he has a big nose so he's joo' is stupid
@lanadelesoteric said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
But ethnography is a real thing, different ethnicities and races have different behavioural characteristics and appearances.
So "oh he has a big nose so he's joo" is true, but you don't like it because you think everyone who says that is doing it out of spite?
@ThinPicking said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:
Attempts at "racial" distinctions appear scientifically fallacious to me.
I'll prove racial distinction for you in one little scientific experiment: Look at a picture of a white person; now, look at a picture of a black person. QED.
@questforhealth said in Women, and Why Men are the Problem:
makes you wonder if people here need Jesus not thyroid. Real jesus. Real jesus is love. To do masculine things out of love. Not out of wanting to dominate for the sake of dominating. Do it out of love.
Posted by a woman (I presume) in a thread titled "Women, and Why Men are the Problem". Meanwhile:
11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness. 12 I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve; 14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. 15 Yet woman will be saved through bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with modesty.
and you in another thread:
why am i so confused?? is this a spiritual issue not a physical one?
A little introspection might be a good idea instead of talking about not-manly-enough men.
@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
simply carefully watch Nora's video
hahahahahhahahahah
@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
No political party represents me well enough...
Are you sure? Last time I checked they have plenty of buffoons. (Joke)
@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
Or rather you're making judgments based on your pretty limited scope of knowledge (or rather a scope of unconscious ignorance)?
Whenever someone refers to Dunning-Kruger effect in their argument it's 100% of the time a bad take.
@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
They don't even get what was the original purpose of democracy invented in ancient Greece
With every comment you make yourself seem more and more obnoxious.
@DonkeyDude said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
developing country
Excuse me but Poland is a 1st world developed country; it has Human Development Index in Top-40, higher than Portugal.
@DonkeyDude said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
brags about voting for a far left party
Polish politics is such a joke that voting alone makes one worthy of ridicule, but that he voted for leftists makes me think he was trolling - I know that Peat had some fondness for commies but this is too much.
@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
so you are a fan of PiS
@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
I voted for Razem.
You are not helping yourself... It would be best if you would just stop speaking.
@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
fans of Konfederacja
Huh? Why would I be their fan? Judging your age by your overly liberal use of "LOL" and childish level of blackpill you're more in line with an average voter of theirs.
@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:
I'm saying that responsibly as a well-trained sense-maker and risk assessor. What are your credentials?
Too bad I'm even-better-trained sense-maker and risk assessor. So, what are YOUR credentials, huh? Moreover, I have officially recognised and independently calibrated retardation detector and your comment set a new measurement record. Well done.