What's up with all the spam posts?
-
Why can't membership to the forum be more difficult to get so that only humans can enter?
In time there is life but no knowledge; outside time there is knowledge but no life
-
The laziness is insane.
-
@jamezb46 Or as someone said before hand... litterally cap the posts for a new account to a few posts and comments for the first day. If a real account wants to post more, he or she can wait a day, it's not deep.
-
@alfredoolivas said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
@jamezb46 Or as someone said before hand... litterally cap the posts for a new account to a few posts and comments for the first day. If a real account wants to post more, he or she can wait a day, it's not deep.
Another vicious bot attack this morning @brad'ster. If this is possible I think it's a good idea.
-
@ThinPicking Hell, even restrict the amount of comments and posts an account can make within the first 2 hours of creation!
The most notorious spam accounts will create all their spam within an hour and never login again afterwards.
For example, yori007 was created, made a bunch of mess within the first hour of creation, and didn't log back in after the first hour
-
I sense a little emphasis on machines here.
-
It's quite fascinating really. This. This is the plan apparently.
-
@alfredoolivas said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
The laziness is insane.
Laziness or aversion to actual speech. Even that which is written and 'anon'.
-
Well, it looks like the admin team has been busy banning new users. 8 new users (by my quick count) were banned within a few hours. Thank you.
https://bioenergetic.forum/usersThe spamsters seem intent on being mischievous.
I am wondering to myself if (or how) the situation will escalate.
-
@alfredoolivas said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
and didn't log back in after the first hour
The account may have been quickly banned to prevent them from creating additional new posts.
-
I added a few anti-spam provisions.
- CAPTCHA for new users. (Not sure if this worked.)
- New users have their posts placed in a queue requiring manual approval before they're posted to the main page. This can be avoided if you confirm your email address or get 2 "reputation" points (still not quite sure what those are).
Let me know if this helps. Will roll them back if unpopular.
-
@brad said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
New users have their posts placed in a queue requiring manual approval before they're posted to the main page. This can be avoided if you confirm your email address or get 2 "reputation" points (still not quite sure what those are).
The reputation points are upvotes.
-
This post is deleted! -
Upvoted.
I'm here for the downvotes.
-
Agreed. Upvoted.
-
I am good with the anti-spam provisions that have been added. Let's wait and see how it goes.
-
Eastbots in a state of utter confusion.
-
you love to see it:
-
@NoeticJuice I actually agree with this sentiment. While the "reputation" feature is necessary for anti-spam, I've added some custom css to hide the vote count. If people demand votes come back then I'll consider it but I don't want some implicit popularity metric aside people's posts. This isn't Reddit.
-
@brad said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
I don't want some implicit popularity metric aside people's posts. This isn't Reddit.
Fine. I appreciate.
