Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.

  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Register
  • Login
Bioenergetic Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Register
  • Login

Random, interesting studies

Literature Review
16
153
5.7k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A
    alfredoolivas @cs3000
    last edited by 14 days ago

    @cs3000 said in Random, interesting studies:

    apparently too slow by itself so they do extra processing

    Could I finely dice it up and put it in a pot of boiling water for 15 minutes, whilst it remains boiling for the entire 15 minutes? would that be effective?

    C 1 Reply Last reply 13 days ago Reply Quote 0
    • C
      cs3000 @alfredoolivas
      last edited by cs3000 13 days ago 13 days ago

      @alfredoolivas i'd guess it takes a lot longer still but not sure ,
      if youre interested in it for the octacosanol sugarcane wax is better only need a little already in a good form https://bioenergetic.forum/post/47406 supplements are around tho

      "world," as a source of new perceptions
      more https://substack.com/@cs3001

      "Self-organizing systems decay only if they have assimilated inertia and — with a little support of the right kind— the centers of degeneration can become centers of regeneration"

      C 1 Reply Last reply 4 days ago Reply Quote 1
      • M
        Mauritio
        last edited by Mauritio 12 days ago 13 days ago

        Again, TLR 4 /Endo­toxin implicated inInfections, not just bac­terial ones, but also viral.

        "TLR4-dependent viral entry was further validated by an anti-TLR4 antibody-mediated blocking experiment. It was noticed that TLR4 is necessary for the early events of viral infection, especially during the attachment and entry stages."

        https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10157217/

        Endotoxin might not just be implicated in viral entry, but long term consequences of viruses .
        The drug larazotide is being researched for long covid symptoms. It basically works in a way that it prevents endotoxin from entering circulation .

        https://ichgcp.net/de/clinical-trials-registry/NCT05747534

        Dare to think.

        My X:
        x.com/Metabolicmonstr

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          Mauritio @cs3000
          last edited by 12 days ago

          @cs3000 said in Random, interesting studies:

          @Mauritio
          one in dogs vs birds (fig 2 , its not policosanol tho general
          fatty acid esters absorbed a little but the fatty alcohol ester didnt https://www.researchgate.net/publication/21739344_Comparative_aspects_of_lipid_digestion_and_absorption_Physiological_correlates_of_wax_ester_digestion

          but looked a bit further for specific, rats can digest even more of it if its esterified specific to oleic acid
          but thats synthetic esterification not bound with oleic acid normally https://grasasyaceites.revistas.csic.es/index.php/grasasyaceites/article/view/1388 , couldnt find if humans could absorb some but theres a case of a women with gastric blockage who ate a lot of honeycomb so at least a lot goes undigested
          https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2740191/#s02
          8e3275d1-bf2b-4741-b064-61a37927c3a5-image.png
          was still worth posting your post now i know more about it & wouldnt have

          @Mauritio said in Random, interesting studies:

          for it beeing indigestible for us ?

          👍 🐝

          study from that megathread showing good anti blood clotting property of policosanol https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9425618/

          Seems right. For some reason birds seem to be good at it. Humans not. Such a shame.

          And interesting studies you posted on Bee bread. Quite the strong effect indeed.

          Dare to think.

          My X:
          x.com/Metabolicmonstr

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            Mauritio
            last edited by Mauritio 10 days ago 10 days ago

            Im not convinced that low protein is dangerous and catabolic, mid - long term in people under 65.

            I recently posted a study showing 5 weeks of 8% protein in the diet did not cause muscle loss. After which someone said that isnt long enough .

            Now here's a study showing that 12 weeks of a very low 0.4g/kg/d, ~5%protein diet does not lower basal muscle protein synthesis!
            https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0137183

            It seems to come down to age as well.
            Here it gets interesting: if you're under 65 and eating a high protein diet, that is strongly associated with death, cancer and diabetes . Over 65 it seems to be protective !

            "...aged 50–65 reporting high protein intake had a 75% increase in overall mortality and a 4-fold increase in cancer and diabetes mortality..."
            https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3988204/

            Not sure why. Low protein diets can lead to lower thymus weight, as seen in this study (https://www.scielo.br/j/bjmbr/a/MGBdr7CsJTMQrf7Bhjbdv3z/?lang=en)
            And older people are more susceptible to infections and chronic inflammation .So maybe after 65 the increase
            in Protein and inflammatory amino acids is worth the trade off, for increased immunity and suppression of inflammation .
            Maybe it's simply the lesser of 2 evils at that point .
            What do you guys think?

            Dare to think.

            My X:
            x.com/Metabolicmonstr

            L D A 3 Replies Last reply 10 days ago Reply Quote 1
            • L
              LucH @Mauritio
              last edited by 10 days ago

              @Mauritio said in Random, interesting studies:

              What do you guys think?

              After 60 yrs, 2 - 5% % loss is usual, according to activity.
              Main causes to fight against (things happening in our bodies as we age that might contribute to sarcopenia):
              Reduction in nerve cells responsible for sending signals from the brain to the muscles to start movement.
              Lower concentrations of some hormones, including growth hormone, testosterone, and insulin-like growth factor
              Increases in inflammation, partly due to disease
              A decrease in the ability to turn protein into energy.

              So, if we can slow down these processes, we could better manage ...
              Law of nature: if not able to reproduce, if not able to transmit knowledge, we become a weight for society.
              Note I don't feel it that way 😉

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • D
                DavidPS @Mauritio
                last edited by DavidPS 10 days ago 10 days ago

                @Mauritio - I am wary of drawing conclusions from studies that lump people into groups based solely on their protein intake. It is too broad-brush for me. For example, is it the high protein or the skewed calcium to phosphorous ratio in the high protein group? Is it the high protein or the change in the glycine to methionine ratio?

                Aging is complex. For a more holistic approach, see Ray Peat's 2015 newsletter:

                https://wiki.chadnet.org/files/imprinting-and-aging.pdf

                ““Effective health care depends on self-care” - Ivan Illich, 👀
                ☂️

                M 1 Reply Last reply 10 days ago Reply Quote 1
                • A
                  alfredoolivas @Mauritio
                  last edited by 10 days ago

                  @Mauritio 64938ff9-2fa5-46b7-beba-7447749fa327-image.png
                  In the first study, the 5% protein diet, caused 0.32% loss in free fat mass.

                  Which is almost nothing right? very interesting.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply 10 days ago Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    Mauritio @DavidPS
                    last edited by 10 days ago

                    @DavidPS It is speculative for sure . But the effect was strong. A 75% increase in overall mortality is pretty wild.

                    It hints at low protein being safe. That's what I'm getting at . If it was harmful, it would be unlikely to have such a drastic effect.

                    Dare to think.

                    My X:
                    x.com/Metabolicmonstr

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      Mauritio @alfredoolivas
                      last edited by 10 days ago

                      @alfredoolivas yeah that's negligible. Pretty wild . Thanks for sharing.

                      And Im not sure people realize how low 5% is .10% is doable .
                      8% is somewhat doable, but 5% is really hard . Especially for 12 weeks.

                      I remember posting the 8% study on reddit and some smartass was like : "Good luck loosing all your muscle" ...

                      Basically zero muscle loss after 12 weeks of 5% protein is pretty impressive.

                      Dare to think.

                      My X:
                      x.com/Metabolicmonstr

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        Mauritio
                        last edited by 5 days ago

                        Seems like they do eat the honeycomb as well.
                        @cs3000
                        Youtube Video

                        Dare to think.

                        My X:
                        x.com/Metabolicmonstr

                        R C 2 Replies Last reply 5 days ago Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          random @Mauritio
                          last edited by random 5 days ago 5 days ago

                          @Mauritio said in Random, interesting studies:

                          Seems like they do eat the honeycomb as well.
                          @cs3000
                          Youtube Video

                          There's no moment in this video where we see the Africans eating the honey for several seconds without the shot changing, so there's not even time to see if they swallow it or spit the comb out after chewing, there is 2 hunters eating honey, and the first hunter legit still has a ball of wax in the inside of his right cheek right before camera switch. Are you looking for confirmation bias?

                          M 1 Reply Last reply 5 days ago Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            Mauritio @random
                            last edited by 5 days ago

                            @random Yeah maybe they spit it out. Just came across this video randomly and thought it was interesting.

                            Dare to think.

                            My X:
                            x.com/Metabolicmonstr

                            R 1 Reply Last reply 5 days ago Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              random @Mauritio
                              last edited by 5 days ago

                              @Mauritio said in Random, interesting studies:

                              @random Yeah maybe they spit it out. Just came across this video randomly and thought it was interesting.

                              I suggest try to find videos where the camera focus on the hunters for long enough with out switching to see if they spit or swallow the comb

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                cs3000 @Mauritio
                                last edited by cs3000 4 days ago 4 days ago

                                @Mauritio wax is about 10% of the size when u chew it down so they might let it build up a bit
                                in this one the older guy spits out the wax (& the dude with the 80s hairstyle)
                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJXpp8A1MSA#t=34m35s
                                and the guy on the right did https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMbbxwLyZLc#t=23m22s but the guy on the left was swallowing some tho https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMbbxwLyZLc#t=19m25s

                                can build up & block the stomach / intestine anyway swallowing enough at once and not much to gain as can get the compounds in the wax other places & absorbed

                                "world," as a source of new perceptions
                                more https://substack.com/@cs3001

                                "Self-organizing systems decay only if they have assimilated inertia and — with a little support of the right kind— the centers of degeneration can become centers of regeneration"

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • C
                                  CrumblingCookie @cs3000
                                  last edited by CrumblingCookie 4 days ago 4 days ago

                                  @cs3000
                                  Thanks for clearing up this issue of the policosanols in beeswax being non-hydrolysed and therefore essentially useless.

                                  I had been using 20mg policosanols daily (the Swanson product) for a couple of months: Mildly beneficial for digestion and maybe overall.
                                  Then I had used yellow beeswax for a while and every now and then at equivalent amounts of c. 2grams, as per the older info on the RPF, and that never helped with anything and distinctly worsened digestion. From your answer I now finally know why.

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply 4 days ago Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    cs3000 @CrumblingCookie
                                    last edited by cs3000 4 days ago 4 days ago

                                    @CrumblingCookie np ah fits then, funny how this stuff works sometimes. soon after seeing this i got honeycomb as a gift. probably would have ate a decent amount & irritated my intestine damage more if not for this thread & looking into it. great timing

                                    "world," as a source of new perceptions
                                    more https://substack.com/@cs3001

                                    "Self-organizing systems decay only if they have assimilated inertia and — with a little support of the right kind— the centers of degeneration can become centers of regeneration"

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply 4 days ago Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      Mauritio @cs3000
                                      last edited by 4 days ago

                                      @cs3000 same I was about to reorder honeycomb from Italy, but don't want to risk stomach blockade or anything similar.

                                      Dare to think.

                                      My X:
                                      x.com/Metabolicmonstr

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply 4 days ago Reply Quote 0
                                      • R
                                        random @Mauritio
                                        last edited by 4 days ago

                                        @Mauritio said in Random, interesting studies:

                                        @cs3000 same I was about to reorder honeycomb from Italy, but don't want to risk stomach blockade or anything similar.

                                        @cs3000

                                        You Can still get different effects from it even if you dont swallow the comb, sometimes more powerfull than honey in jar.

                                        There is claims on internet associated with ayurveda that scealed honey comb retain his prana much longer than honey in jar.

                                        I suggest to buy it only from a beekeepers you Can ask questions, due to some beekeepers using plastic/synthetic materials that end up in the comb

                                        E 1 Reply Last reply 2 days ago Reply Quote 0
                                        • R
                                          revenant
                                          last edited by 3 days ago

                                          Regarding low protein:

                                          "Hong Kong has one of the highest meat consumption per capita in the world at 664g per day."

                                          "Hong Kong people have a very long life expectancy. In 2023, the expectancy of life at birth for men and women was 83 years and 88 years."

                                          Okinawans ate a lot of pork too when they topped the longevity charts. Not sure how to explain this contradiction. In general meat consumption correlates positively with lifespan:

                                          https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8881926/

                                          Low protein looks great in studies but I didn't feel particularly good on it, nor did I lose weight.

                                          TexugoDoMelT 1 Reply Last reply 3 days ago Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 6
                                          • 7
                                          • 8
                                          • 3 / 8
                                          3 / 8
                                          • First post
                                            139/153
                                            Last post