What's up with all the spam posts?
-
Why can't membership to the forum be more difficult to get so that only humans can enter?
In time there is life but no knowledge; outside time there is knowledge but no life
-
The laziness is insane.
-
@jamezb46 Or as someone said before hand... litterally cap the posts for a new account to a few posts and comments for the first day. If a real account wants to post more, he or she can wait a day, it's not deep.
-
@alfredoolivas said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
@jamezb46 Or as someone said before hand... litterally cap the posts for a new account to a few posts and comments for the first day. If a real account wants to post more, he or she can wait a day, it's not deep.
Another vicious bot attack this morning @brad'ster. If this is possible I think it's a good idea.
-
@ThinPicking Hell, even restrict the amount of comments and posts an account can make within the first 2 hours of creation!
The most notorious spam accounts will create all their spam within an hour and never login again afterwards.
For example, yori007 was created, made a bunch of mess within the first hour of creation, and didn't log back in after the first hour
-
I sense a little emphasis on machines here.
-
It's quite fascinating really. This. This is the plan apparently.
-
@alfredoolivas said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
The laziness is insane.
Laziness or aversion to actual speech. Even that which is written and 'anon'.
-
Well, it looks like the admin team has been busy banning new users. 8 new users (by my quick count) were banned within a few hours. Thank you.
https://bioenergetic.forum/usersThe spamsters seem intent on being mischievous.
I am wondering to myself if (or how) the situation will escalate.
-
@alfredoolivas said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
and didn't log back in after the first hour
The account may have been quickly banned to prevent them from creating additional new posts.
-
I added a few anti-spam provisions.
- CAPTCHA for new users. (Not sure if this worked.)
- New users have their posts placed in a queue requiring manual approval before they're posted to the main page. This can be avoided if you confirm your email address or get 2 "reputation" points (still not quite sure what those are).
Let me know if this helps. Will roll them back if unpopular.
-
@brad said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
New users have their posts placed in a queue requiring manual approval before they're posted to the main page. This can be avoided if you confirm your email address or get 2 "reputation" points (still not quite sure what those are).
The reputation points are upvotes.
-
@brad said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
"reputation" points
I don't think this is beneficial. Being able to vote on posts can further discourage people from posting things that go against consensus. But those very same posts can promote learning and lead to interesting and beneficial discoveries, even if the content of those posts are inaccurate.
"We must remember that the only instrument of investigation we possess is our mind . . . The quality and condition of the telescope govern the observation resulting from its use. If there is dust on our lens, we see dark spots in the heavens."
🎧🎶24/7
-
Upvoted.
I'm here for the downvotes.
-
Agreed. Upvoted.
-
I am good with the anti-spam provisions that have been added. Let's wait and see how it goes.
-
Eastbots in a state of utter confusion.
-
you love to see it:
-
@NoeticJuice I actually agree with this sentiment. While the "reputation" feature is necessary for anti-spam, I've added some custom css to hide the vote count. If people demand votes come back then I'll consider it but I don't want some implicit popularity metric aside people's posts. This isn't Reddit.
-
@brad said in What's up with all the spam posts?:
I don't want some implicit popularity metric aside people's posts. This isn't Reddit.
Fine. I appreciate.
