Posts made by Truth

@yerrag said in Beware of the Low Vitamin A Zealots- New Thorough Video by Mike Fave:

@Truth said in Beware of the Low Vitamin A Zealots- New Thorough Video by Mike Fave:

@yerrag said in Beware of the Low Vitamin A Zealots- New Thorough Video by Mike Fave:

Contrary to the delusional claim of @Truth that I wasn't successful in achieving optimal metabolism, I have achieved that already long ago. And it is by following Ray Peat. Certainly it is hard for health coaches to sell their clients on the idea that 4 years is needed to really get rid of PUFA stores, but the reality may be that. Unless otherwise proven.

As sure as the sun rises and sets, people who can't accept the long time it takes to get rid of PUFA stores in order to live a healthy lifestyle that relies on sugar metabolusm primarily- they would have to embrace the false nutritional lifestyles centered on keto and carnivore. But for their lack of the patience of a turtle, they won't have the kind of health that comes from being less stressed, as their body would have to rely on adaptations that necessitate the production of stress hormones to keep their body in survival mode. On vicious cycles instead of virtuous cycles. One is low energy and shorter lived. The other high energy and longer lived.

It's better to keep your confused comments on the other post, you clearly said weeks ago that the practical application of an "optimal sugar metabolism" is what's missing from Raymond Peat's ideas, and didn't answer when I asked if you reached it practically, and now you claim you reached it through Ray Peat's ideas, no sense.

That's what you said weeks ago, either you're confused, or you're lying, or you don't know how to express your ideas:

@yerrag said in Banned from RP forum : Can you do better than this.:

@Truth

RPF, as I said in previous a previous, has been a failure. Its main pillar is that optimal sugar metabolism is the key to health. Yet the site is vexed and stuck in not knowing how to make its members transform themselves from being poor sugar metabolizers into optimal sugar metabolizers. Ray Peat spoke only about the superiority of having optimal sugar metabolism, bit never spoke how to go about making that transformation. The site could have provided that a workable blueprint on how to go about that transformation, thus enabling many members towards the path to metabolic health. But it never got that going. There was a member named Cirion. He was piling on weight taking in lots of sugar because he believed sugar was good, but his body did not metabolize sugar well, and so he suddenly dropped out never to be heard from again. We don't really know if is still alive.

I feel charlie would be better off refocusing the website towards making the transformation to optimal sugar metabolism be a key goal before he embarked on his anti-peat mission

No sense at all talking sense to you. You've drawn a line in the sand. My attempts at correcting your abject lack of comprehension fail because of your insistence that your interpretation of what I said is what I meant. How is that for being exhibit A for being anal? I am the source of a ststement that you ask me to clarify, and deapite my doing so, you doggedly insist on tour interpretation.

I will just shake the dirt off my sandals and say anathema with you! May I be the last to cast you as good riddance! Have a nice life.

Don't be a liar, or continue your confusion, if you genuinely believe that what I'm saying that your comments from weeks ago imply, doesn't correspond to your ideas or what you meant, you simply didn't convey your ideas in a way that corresponds to what you had in mind. My claim wasn't delusional at all, considering that's the most logical way to understand your comments, your non-answers to my questions about practical application, and your return to animosity and attempts at name-calling right after those questions. I didn't ask you to clarify

@yerrag said in Beware of the Low Vitamin A Zealots- New Thorough Video by Mike Fave:

Contrary to the delusional claim of @Truth that I wasn't successful in achieving optimal metabolism, I have achieved that already long ago. And it is by following Ray Peat. Certainly it is hard for health coaches to sell their clients on the idea that 4 years is needed to really get rid of PUFA stores, but the reality may be that. Unless otherwise proven.

As sure as the sun rises and sets, people who can't accept the long time it takes to get rid of PUFA stores in order to live a healthy lifestyle that relies on sugar metabolusm primarily- they would have to embrace the false nutritional lifestyles centered on keto and carnivore. But for their lack of the patience of a turtle, they won't have the kind of health that comes from being less stressed, as their body would have to rely on adaptations that necessitate the production of stress hormones to keep their body in survival mode. On vicious cycles instead of virtuous cycles. One is low energy and shorter lived. The other high energy and longer lived.

It's better to keep your confused comments on the other post, you clearly said weeks ago that the practical application of an "optimal sugar metabolism" is what's missing from Raymond Peat's ideas, and didn't answer when I asked if you reached it practically, and now you claim you reached it through Ray Peat's ideas, no sense.

That's what you said weeks ago, either you're confused, or you're lying, or you don't know how to express your ideas:

@yerrag said in Banned from RP forum : Can you do better than this.:

@Truth

RPF, as I said in previous a previous, has been a failure. Its main pillar is that optimal sugar metabolism is the key to health. Yet the site is vexed and stuck in not knowing how to make its members transform themselves from being poor sugar metabolizers into optimal sugar metabolizers. Ray Peat spoke only about the superiority of having optimal sugar metabolism, bit never spoke how to go about making that transformation. The site could have provided that a workable blueprint on how to go about that transformation, thus enabling many members towards the path to metabolic health. But it never got that going. There was a member named Cirion. He was piling on weight taking in lots of sugar because he believed sugar was good, but his body did not metabolize sugar well, and so he suddenly dropped out never to be heard from again. We don't really know if is still alive.

I feel charlie would be better off refocusing the website towards making the transformation to optimal sugar metabolism be a key goal before he embarked on his anti-peat mission

@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Why are you all so religious:

@Truth These people were liberal. Read what I wrote about Vatican II. I have answered your other question previously both in this thread and in a previous thread. See what I wrote about overcoming the will through objectivity. You can also read again the answers I provided you when we discussed this earlier in the other thread. You are bringing up the same points again and again even though you have been given the answers

There are reports of pedophilia by "Christians" before "Vatican 2", Just because you've mentioned some of your beliefs on other threads doesn't mean it's not useful for you to do so here, i don't remember everything you wrote, I don't feel like rereading each of these threads, and I'm not the only reader

You haven't answered if it's your belief that no non-Catholic "true Christian" has committed child abuse in modern times

You say in the small text below your comments "The purpose of art is not the release of a momentary ejection of adrenaline but is, rather, the gradual, lifelong construction of a state of wonder and serenity.", it implies that you think that wonder and serenity on the long term are the highest aim and/or have the most value in life(as you said "art" is, and that the purpose of art is wonder and serenity), serenity is often associated with well being,

Why would you think that serenity is one of humanity's two highest goals (along with wonder) if not because you feel it as well-being and/or because it increases your well-being?

@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Why are you all so religious:

@Truth I do not put ultimate value on energy, well-being, & fertility. Like Schopenhauer and that dork Nietczhe after him, I think art is the heighest aim of humanity. Art trancends the will into objectivity. At certain times you can borrow the beatific vision for a moment. I think the adante on Mozart's 21 piano concerto is worth more than some neanderthal man having a high energy level and wanting to get laid(lol). I think it is a mistake to make a metabolic lifestyle the ultimate aim. Peat talked about this too. You want a good health to aid you in achieving your greatest potential. It is good that you attack pedo's though. These people should be publicly sterilized.

why do you consider "art" to be mankind's highest goal when it's not necessarily associated with a significant increase in the degree of energy, well-being, joy over the long term, either for the person who supposedly made it, or for the people and/or majority of people exposed to it?

how do you measure what is positive and what is negative if not by its impact on the energy, well-being, joy, longevity, fertility of the person and/or the majority of people?

The point about "Christian" child abusers is that it shows that being "Christian" in itself doesn't make you tend towards an optimal Degree of energy and/or Masculinity, without considering other factors

@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Why are you all so religious:

@Truth After Vatican II, the catholic church is not Christian but just a liberal political organization.
It is just a fact that the best people in history were Italian and Germanic Christian artist who managed to transcend the human. Bach, Michaelangelo, and Mozart are good examples. Europe at it's peak was the clear high point in human history and it was driven by Aryan Christianinty.

Is it your thought that no non catholic true "christian" has committed child abuse in modern times?

You mentioned Bach, michaelangelo, Mozart, did they tend towards an optimal degree of energy, well-being, fertility, if so how do you know?

According to your beliefs, are there things associated with them that contribute considerably to the fact that the majority of people exposed to them tend towards a degree of optimal energy and well-being over the long term?

@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Why are you all so religious:

@Hando-Jin false. Almost all the greatest men in history were Christian Aryans. We should therefore produce more Christian Aryans. Atheism is unreasonable. Liberalism is dysgenic. Both atheism and liberalism needs to go.

Hi, There are reports of people who have abused children and practice Christianity, and/or claim to be Christian, and/or are considered Christian, including church people such as deacons, Priests

One report mentions over two hundred thousand cases of child abuse in the French church since 1950,

https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_indépendante_sur_les_abus_sexuels_dans_l'Église

just this phenomenon of child abuse by some "christians" within and with out the church is enough to demonstrate that being a "Christian" in it self does not make one tend towards an optimal degree of energy and masculinity

Also, I suggest that "History" is a fiction, which may be true, may be false, in which you are free to believe, it remains a personal belief, such as religion, and not a knowledge with a very high degree of credibility, specifically when these are events before our lifetime and the lives of our parents/grandparents, and we have no certainty that what is written is mostly true and/or totally true, and that potentially other writings claiming different perspectives have not been found and/or lost/destroyed

@Hando-Jin said in Why are you all so religious:

There's no need for it. Ray wasn't.

Hi, whether Raymond was "religious" or not, people dont have to do as he did, it's not intrinsically optimal to imitate Raymond.

From my experience, I suggest that there are several common factors that are associated with and/or contribute to belief in "religion":

The fact that children and young adolescents(to some degree, also women, and men who are not in optimal state), we are more inclined to believe in the claims of others, specifically when these claims arouse emotions such as fear, respect, "greatness", submission, that some of these lingering negative emotions can contribute in part to a phenomenon named "Stockholm syndrome", and that many of the people in our environment whom we tend to imitate and/or be influenced by, also believe in these claims

Potentially the innate instinct of children, women, and men who do not feel an optimal degree of energy and masculinity to want to associate, cooperate, and/or be protected by a man/men who tend to a higher degree of energy and masculinity, considering that nowadays in certain environments, there are few men who tend to an optimal degree of energy and Masculinity, this innate instinct may be directed towards the figure of a creator and/or a "god" rather than a man

some elements of religious texts can also arouse emotions that some people enjoy

In my experience, as a man(i dont know for women), i suggest the more we tend towards an optimal degree of energy, masculinity, sovereignty, consideration of our instincts and experiences above claims and theories, the lower our propensity for submission and fear,

The less we think and believe in "religion" and "god", up to a certain threshold where we no longer perceive the idea and/or feeling of a creator as something superior and external to us

@yerrag said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@yerrag said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@yerrag said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@yerrag On what do you base your belief that Jesus is not only a fictional character and that he was a living person, and on what do you base your belief of the attributes you think he had?

Is there another source other than the same source you have, as Jesus did not flash a strong light as I was driving and revealed himself to me to start a new religion.

Did you want to follow up with one enlightening and mesmerizing gotcha, sticks?

I dont have any source, i dont have any belief related to that.

You base your beliefs on the Bible, or on "historical accounts", how in your thoughts do you discern what you think is propaganda and control, and what you think is factual about "Jesus"?

"Sticks" Can you stay correct or do you want to continue to be perceived as mentally ill, mentally ill person?

You ask for proof as if proof is like something one readily finds in a Rosetta stone. I would give you an explanation like I had done before, but it's best you begin to use tour God-given mind and get inspired to start thinking. I know, I know, it's hard. Just start with small tidbits of thought and slowly increase the stress on your mind.

You will get the hang of it, bones! Believe in yourself.

Mentally ill person,

The Questions neither imply nor speak of proof,

I said belief, not knowledge on top of that.

Already in this exchange, I've for sure used my " god" mind to think, rather than your low energy mediocre mind

Yes, mentally ill. So can you do me a favor and we just ignore each other. I'll always be testy with you. You feel you have some valid questions, whereas I consider them pointless and peripheral and have little bearing on the topic at hand. It's always a sidebar with you. Beside the point. And immaterial. But that is what makes you you. Some people will enjoy a tête a tete with you over coffee, but not I. Truthfully, I am annoyed. Rightly or wrongly.

All the best. Have a nice life.

Mentally ill person,

Why do you go to forums, if you feel animosity towards people who have different ideas from yours on certain subjects, even when they don't want to hurt others,

and if you feel animosity towards people who ask questions about your claims, even when these questions are elementary, and impartial?

Your ability to benefit from and contribute to forums seems low at the moment,

I suggest you should stop going on forums and/or the internet, try to relax and increase your energy and potentially come back later

@yerrag said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@yerrag said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@yerrag On what do you base your belief that Jesus is not only a fictional character and that he was a living person, and on what do you base your belief of the attributes you think he had?

Is there another source other than the same source you have, as Jesus did not flash a strong light as I was driving and revealed himself to me to start a new religion.

Did you want to follow up with one enlightening and mesmerizing gotcha, sticks?

I dont have any source, i dont have any belief related to that.

You base your beliefs on the Bible, or on "historical accounts", how in your thoughts do you discern what you think is propaganda and control, and what you think is factual about "Jesus"?

"Sticks" Can you stay correct or do you want to continue to be perceived as mentally ill, mentally ill person?

You ask for proof as if proof is like something one readily finds in a Rosetta stone. I would give you an explanation like I had done before, but it's best you begin to use tour God-given mind and get inspired to start thinking. I know, I know, it's hard. Just start with small tidbits of thought and slowly increase the stress on your mind.

You will get the hang of it, bones! Believe in yourself.

Mentally ill person,

The Questions neither imply nor speak of proof,

I said belief, not knowledge on top of that.

Already in this exchange, I've for sure used my " god" mind to think, rather than your low energy mediocre mind

@yerrag said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@yerrag On what do you base your belief that Jesus is not only a fictional character and that he was a living person, and on what do you base your belief of the attributes you think he had?

Is there another source other than the same source you have, as Jesus did not flash a strong light as I was driving and revealed himself to me to start a new religion.

Did you want to follow up with one enlightening and mesmerizing gotcha, sticks?

I dont have any source, i dont have any thoughts and beliefs related to that, unless i ask someone about his claims on it

You base your beliefs on the Bible, or on "historical accounts", how in your thoughts do you discern what you think is propaganda and control, and what you think is factual about "Jesus"?

"Sticks" Can you stay correct or do you want to continue to be perceived as mentally ill, mentally ill person?

@yerrag On what do you base your belief that Jesus is not only a fictional character and that he was a living person, and on what do you base your belief in the attributes you think he had?

@Regina hi, bean pill 🫘🫘🫘

@CO3 said in Why is the Ray Peat community so far right?:

@Truth

He gave of the firstlings - multiple! possibly valuable females too - AND of their fat! He has no intention to receive better than he gave, unlike his brother. It's a massive difference from giving some grain that you were going to sell. The two professions are very different in the way that you can accumulate

Are you refering to this ?

I did read the story of Cain and Abel on internet, it doesn't mention anything about Cain intending to receive more in return, nor does it mention that they do these tasks to earn money, sell to whom if they are supposed to be the first children of Adam and Eve, the first humans?

@CO3 said in Why is the Ray Peat community so far right?:

@Truth

He gave of the firstlings - multiple! possibly valuable females too - AND of their fat! He has no intention to receive better than he gave, unlike his brother. It's a massive difference from giving some grain that you were going to sell. The two professions are very different in the way that you can accumulate

Do you have any passages from this story to quote that implicitly or explicitly say that abel did not intend to receive better unlike cain, and that Cain intended to sell the grain unlike abel and the lambs?

@CO3 Hi, in what I've read on the internet, in the story Abel sacrificed a lamb among the flock, why do you make a distinction and not consider it a surplus compare to Cain's sacrifice? What aspect of this passage implicitly or explicitly says that Cain was greed driven and not Abel?

@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@GreekDemiGod

Genuinely curious why you're dumb enough to uses phrases like "pro VA camp". It's a fundamental feature of life Greek.

Also genuinely curious why you're desperate for any explanation other than "I was stupid" to explain the remaining aspects of this you're clinging on to for dear life.

Actually though. It's probably a better idea for you and I to ask these important questions in your existing VA curiosity thread.

Hi, I suggest that this animosity is not legitimate, he has seen some temporary benefits in changing his diet, even if he also had negative symptoms that made him stop, it probably makes him question why

@GreekDemiGod Hi, what is the evidence for this claim? Does this claim imply that there isnt any other "vitamin" that above a certain threshold or above a certain threshold relative to other elements in the blood, is associated with "toxic effets", and that "vitamins" can increase unlimitedly in the blood without causing "toxic effects"?