Posts made by Truth

@Truth said in Dismantling Charlie's words and deeds on the "raypeat "forum and here:

@Truth said in Dismantling Charlie's words and deeds on the "raypeat "forum and here:

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

after he was exposed, charlie backtracked his claims and says he now agrees again that people can share pro vitamin A studies on the forum

When we search for "Ray peat" forum on the search engine, charlie has changed the description to:

"Ray Peat Forum: Interweaving Low-Toxin Lifestyle Approaches, Toxic Bile Theory Insights, and Ray Peat's Research Contributions." (Charlie has claimed recently that Raymond's ideas are mostly toxic and harmfull)

While intentionally linking in second just below the "Ray peat" forum name, the second page of a thread speculating on Raymond Peat's death, absolutely no links to articles, interviews and contributions from Raymond Peat. Vicious

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

after he was exposed, charlie backtracked his claims and says he now agrees again that people can share pro vitamin A studies on the forum

When we search for "Ray peat" forum on the search engine, charlie has changed the description to:

"Ray Peat Forum: Interweaving Low-Toxin Lifestyle Approaches, Toxic Bile Theory Insights, and Ray Peat's Research Contributions." (Charlie has claimed recently that Raymond's ideas are mostly toxic and harmfull)

While intentionally linking in second just below the "Ray peat" forum name, the second page of a thread speculating on Raymond Peat's death, absolutely no links to articles, interviews, research or contributions from Raymond Peat. Vicious

@Truth said in Dismantling Charlie's words and deeds on the "raypeat "forum and here:

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

after he was exposed, charlie backtracked his claims and says he now agrees again that people can share pro vitamin A studies on the forum

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

after he was exposed, charlie backtracked his claims and says he now agrees again that people can share pro vitamin A studies on the forum

@S-Holmes @TheRealPeater He's been a very bad admin since at least early 2021, banning people without declaring it just because they bring up things Charlie doesn't like or that upset his beliefs, per exemple, banned once for bringing up the report of hundreds of thousands of child abuse within the church, published by the church

Allegedly he told some people he started eating muscle meat and rice 3 years ago

@Light @Verdad apparently all "Ray peat" forum threads have been downloaded

@Verdad the forum is dead, he will potentially change the name

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

Charlie who is potentially trying to make people believe that Raymond Peat's perspective on receptors implies that if there are no receptors for a certain element/nutrient, then that element is not essential, Raymond absolutely never said that(from what i have Seen), Raymond said that even without receptors various elements/nutrients have positive effects

@Truth said in Dismantling Charlie's words and deeds on the "raypeat "forum and here:

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

Charlie who potentially tries to act and make people believe that he shares Raymond Peat's ideas with some "Ray peat right again" label to potentially try to damage control his previous post on pro vitamin A studies not being allowed

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/the-toxic-ray-peat-diet-lifestyle-is-keeping-many-in-captivity-ray-peat-never-offered-a-way-out.52612/page-2

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

Charlie who potentially tries to act and make people believe that he shares Raymond Peat's ideas with some "Ray peat right again" label to potentially try to damage control his previous post on pro vitamin A studies not being allowed

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/the-toxic-ray-peat-diet-lifestyle-is-keeping-many-in-captivity-ray-peat-never-offered-a-way-out.52612/page-2

@TheSir Hi, he potentially wants to do the same thing about vitamin D supplementation, potentially he doesn't only because he's afraid of the potential consequences if he bans Georgi "haidut"

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

Hi, according to Charlie, it's no longer allowed on the "Ray Peat" forum to share "pro vitamin A studies."

To then say it's an essential nutrient

This is not the official stance of the forum, it is Charlie's personal belief, 99.99% of the people on the forum do not share this idea, neither does Ray Peat,

Charlie you can and should remove the name "Ray Peat" from the name of the site, because it is not allowed to share studies that correspond to Ray's ideas, in this case it is only allowed to share studies if they correspond and are not in contradiction with your personal beliefs

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/forum-official-stance-on-vitamin-a-research-studies-direction.52637/

@Amazoniac hi, blossom has already said that it's Charlie who has authority over her on all banning and moderation decisions if they disagree, it's him who has the final decision, so every ban that Charlie knows about and doesn't lift is a ban from Charlie

@yerrag Blablabla rambling, dogding questions

@brad a neutral name such as miscellaneous discussions is good enough

@saturnuscv lololol aaaaah, It's all good son, everything's going to be fine

@saturnuscv Your mom and I procreated you

@brad Hi Brad, I suggest that the name "junkyard" is sub-optimal and/or bad, i suggest you change it to another name that remains more factual if it's a category that you put posts that you think are not related to other categories

"Quality" is determined by the interest and/or usefulness that people find in it

@Kvothe said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth "Esteemed Members...there will be total war on the Retinoids"

lololol