Do we live in a mathmatical constructed, scripted reality?
-
@Samyo said in Do we live in a mathmatical constructed, scripted reality?:
Trump is meant to get the "eye wound either 4th or 5th april
The dates combine with him being the 45th president
he still alive......?
-
This post is deleted! -
Have you seen this?
It’s a commitment
Slow start but important because he lays the foundationhttps://www.bitchute.com/video/RK4Cl95vlisV/
Unfortunately
This is an edited version
But still really good -
@Kilgore Its coming, he doesnt die from this, as he ressurects 3 days later..
-
-
@Samyo Now what?
I already saw someone say that we are 3 months 3 weeks 3 days from the election.
-
-
@Geater #45 would be more believable.
-
-
This post is deleted! -
‘Won’ the election with 81 million votes.
Today Biden is 81 years 8 months and 1 day old
Ritual = 81/81
President Biden = 81
8=H 1=A
Ha ha
-
What are your thoughts on Akashic records?
I learned of this today actually
Want to investigate moreAny opinion?
-
This post is deleted! -
@Peatful said in Do we live in a mathmatical constructed, scripted reality?:
What are your thoughts on Akashic records?
I learned of this today actually
Want to investigate moreAny opinion?
For reference:
“Akashic records are a collection of all events, thoughts, emotions, and intentions that have ever occurred, or will occur, in the past, present, or future.
They are believed to exist in a non-physical plane of existence called the mental plane, and are guarded by powerful beings of light.”
These are not beings of light imo
Ex:
Lucifer is named the Light BearerOne act of obedience is better than one hundred sermons.
-DB
-
The Vedas emphasize that the material world is unreal, akin to a simulation. They call this force, for lack of better description, Maya which all material reality is constructed of and within.
The Gnostics say the material world is a construct created by the entity Yaldebaoth, who pieced off from divinity as a sort of aberration and thinking himself 'god' since he knew not his origin, generated the material world in the image and likeness of his own semi-divine power.
If you experience certain entheogens, you could be convinced that there are other 'layers' existing outside of the material senses. There are entities there like the so-called 'machine elves', or the weird top hat guy, who various people worldwide have encountered without knowing each other. There is 'remote viewing' occurrences which defy logic. And all of this can feasibly be experienced without the need of entheogenic intervention, albeit that path is exceptionally challenging.
There are things like premonition and 'seeing the future' through visions which defy common scientific understandings, and thus ignored by the greater scientific community.
Imo, physical reality is like a VM on a computer. There is backend code blackboxed from the VM OS which gives that OS a platform to run, organizes its causes and effects, etc. People born into the physical world as 'user classes' cannot know of the backend due to permissions restrictions. The user class is instantiated with a physical body to operate within, and an individual micro-OS to operate the body and 'person'. This micro-OS is Ego, meant for preservation and propagation of the body, and provide the instantiated user with the avatar 'self'. Without this, the instantiated user would be an unlearning body flailing around in a sandbox. The user experience is that of programming the Ego for worldly operations, and hopefully figuring out the distinction.
Certain paths users can take in life expose APIs to the backend, expose certain backend 'logs' or enable the user to escalate their role towards admin capabilities. The discovery or even a feel of the actual self accelerates this process, with the ultimate goals including the knowledge of the separation of Ego self from the Self, and being able to operate via the Self.
Keep in mind that this minimal metaphor in no way encapsulates the sheer complexity of the system as a whole, and is my personal view based on many, many years of seeking the What Is of reality. From what I've personally experienced, this is accurate, but I won't say that it's the absolute truth -
@OliverCloasov said in Do we live in a mathmatical constructed, scripted reality?:
Keep in mind that this minimal metaphor in no way encapsulates the sheer complexity of the system as a whole
Good. Good good good.
I might call it a dangerous thought form without this. Even self reference to it as a 'system' is tricky. But I still go there.
-
@ThinPicking Why would you consider this metaphor 'dangerous'?
-
Well I don't here because you qualified it. And (almost) no one ought to care what I think anyway.
But for my own walk through 'simulation theory' as an absolute, and having some friends who stuck with it. It can make seemingly comfortable ground to justify almost anything. It's amusing to me how stupid I've been, and probably still am. Only relieving to know how stupid the semiconductors are. Marvellous as we can make them seem by abstraction.
-
-
@ThinPicking well put and thanks for clarifying. I can absolutely see what you're saying, and I've seen as much from those who sideline spirituality for an entirely mechanistic view of reality. I suppose I'm a bit insulated from this conceptualization degenerating into amorality and absolute 'do what thou wilt' bc I essentially view the 'backend' as God Himself.
